From: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
To: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/oa/uapi: Expose an unblock after N reports OA property
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 16:54:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z1zXUdMPUGQVO5yJ@orsosgc001> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241212224903.1853862-1-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 02:49:03PM -0800, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
>Expose an "unblock after N reports" OA property, to allow userspace threads
>to be woken up less frequently.
>
>Co-developed-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa_types.h | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c | 2 +-
> include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h | 7 +++++++
> 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
>index ec88b18e9baa2..56bf375a9d4bc 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
>@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ struct xe_oa_open_param {
> int num_syncs;
> struct xe_sync_entry *syncs;
> size_t oa_buffer_size;
>+ int wait_num_reports;
> };
>
> struct xe_oa_config_bo {
>@@ -241,11 +242,10 @@ static void oa_timestamp_clear(struct xe_oa_stream *stream, u32 *report)
> static bool xe_oa_buffer_check_unlocked(struct xe_oa_stream *stream)
> {
> u32 gtt_offset = xe_bo_ggtt_addr(stream->oa_buffer.bo);
>+ u32 tail, hw_tail, partial_report_size, available;
> int report_size = stream->oa_buffer.format->size;
>- u32 tail, hw_tail;
> unsigned long flags;
> bool pollin;
>- u32 partial_report_size;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&stream->oa_buffer.ptr_lock, flags);
>
>@@ -289,8 +289,8 @@ static bool xe_oa_buffer_check_unlocked(struct xe_oa_stream *stream)
>
> stream->oa_buffer.tail = tail;
>
>- pollin = xe_oa_circ_diff(stream, stream->oa_buffer.tail,
>- stream->oa_buffer.head) >= report_size;
>+ available = xe_oa_circ_diff(stream, stream->oa_buffer.tail, stream->oa_buffer.head);
>+ pollin = available >= stream->wait_num_reports * report_size;
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&stream->oa_buffer.ptr_lock, flags);
>
>@@ -1285,6 +1285,17 @@ static int xe_oa_set_prop_oa_buffer_size(struct xe_oa *oa, u64 value,
> return 0;
> }
>
>+static int xe_oa_set_prop_wait_num_reports(struct xe_oa *oa, u64 value,
>+ struct xe_oa_open_param *param)
>+{
>+ if (!value) {
>+ drm_dbg(&oa->xe->drm, "wait_num_reports %llu\n", value);
>+ return -EINVAL;
>+ }
>+ param->wait_num_reports = value;
>+ return 0;
>+}
>+
> static int xe_oa_set_prop_ret_inval(struct xe_oa *oa, u64 value,
> struct xe_oa_open_param *param)
> {
>@@ -1306,6 +1317,7 @@ static const xe_oa_set_property_fn xe_oa_set_property_funcs_open[] = {
> [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_NUM_SYNCS] = xe_oa_set_prop_num_syncs,
> [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_SYNCS] = xe_oa_set_prop_syncs_user,
> [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_BUFFER_SIZE] = xe_oa_set_prop_oa_buffer_size,
>+ [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_WAIT_NUM_REPORTS] = xe_oa_set_prop_wait_num_reports,
> };
>
> static const xe_oa_set_property_fn xe_oa_set_property_funcs_config[] = {
>@@ -1321,6 +1333,7 @@ static const xe_oa_set_property_fn xe_oa_set_property_funcs_config[] = {
> [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_NUM_SYNCS] = xe_oa_set_prop_num_syncs,
> [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_SYNCS] = xe_oa_set_prop_syncs_user,
> [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_BUFFER_SIZE] = xe_oa_set_prop_ret_inval,
>+ [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_WAIT_NUM_REPORTS] = xe_oa_set_prop_ret_inval,
> };
>
> static int xe_oa_user_ext_set_property(struct xe_oa *oa, enum xe_oa_user_extn_from from,
>@@ -1797,6 +1810,7 @@ static int xe_oa_stream_init(struct xe_oa_stream *stream,
> stream->periodic = param->period_exponent > 0;
> stream->period_exponent = param->period_exponent;
> stream->no_preempt = param->no_preempt;
>+ stream->wait_num_reports = param->wait_num_reports;
>
> stream->xef = xe_file_get(param->xef);
> stream->num_syncs = param->num_syncs;
>@@ -2156,6 +2170,14 @@ int xe_oa_stream_open_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, u64 data, struct drm_file *f
> if (!param.oa_buffer_size)
> param.oa_buffer_size = DEFAULT_XE_OA_BUFFER_SIZE;
>
>+ if (!param.wait_num_reports)
>+ param.wait_num_reports = 1;
>+ if (param.wait_num_reports > param.oa_buffer_size / f->size) {
>+ drm_dbg(&oa->xe->drm, "wait_num_reports %d\n", param.wait_num_reports);
>+ ret = -EINVAL;
>+ goto err_exec_q;
>+ }
If possible, I think this check where wait_num_reports has an upper
limit should be moved to xe_oa_set_prop_wait_num_reports().
With that,
Reviewed-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Thanks,
Umesh
>+
> ret = xe_oa_parse_syncs(oa, ¶m);
> if (ret)
> goto err_exec_q;
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa_types.h
>index df77939156288..2dcd3b9562e97 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa_types.h
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa_types.h
>@@ -218,6 +218,9 @@ struct xe_oa_stream {
> /** @pollin: Whether there is data available to read */
> bool pollin;
>
>+ /** @wait_num_reports: Number of reports to wait for before signalling pollin */
>+ int wait_num_reports;
>+
> /** @periodic: Whether periodic sampling is currently enabled */
> bool periodic;
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c
>index d2a816f71bf26..226b234d07110 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c
>@@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ static int query_oa_units(struct xe_device *xe,
> du->oa_unit_type = u->type;
> du->oa_timestamp_freq = xe_oa_timestamp_frequency(gt);
> du->capabilities = DRM_XE_OA_CAPS_BASE | DRM_XE_OA_CAPS_SYNCS |
>- DRM_XE_OA_CAPS_OA_BUFFER_SIZE;
>+ DRM_XE_OA_CAPS_OA_BUFFER_SIZE | DRM_XE_OA_CAPS_WAIT_NUM_REPORTS;
>
> j = 0;
> for_each_hw_engine(hwe, gt, hwe_id) {
>diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
>index 0383b52cbd869..f62689ca861a4 100644
>--- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
>+++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
>@@ -1487,6 +1487,7 @@ struct drm_xe_oa_unit {
> #define DRM_XE_OA_CAPS_BASE (1 << 0)
> #define DRM_XE_OA_CAPS_SYNCS (1 << 1)
> #define DRM_XE_OA_CAPS_OA_BUFFER_SIZE (1 << 2)
>+#define DRM_XE_OA_CAPS_WAIT_NUM_REPORTS (1 << 3)
>
> /** @oa_timestamp_freq: OA timestamp freq */
> __u64 oa_timestamp_freq;
>@@ -1660,6 +1661,12 @@ enum drm_xe_oa_property_id {
> * buffer is allocated by default.
> */
> DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_BUFFER_SIZE,
>+
>+ /**
>+ * @DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_WAIT_NUM_REPORTS: Number of reports to wait
>+ * for before unblocking poll or read
>+ */
>+ DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_WAIT_NUM_REPORTS,
> };
>
> /**
>--
>2.47.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-14 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-12 22:49 [PATCH] drm/xe/oa/uapi: Expose an unblock after N reports OA property Ashutosh Dixit
2024-12-12 22:59 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2024-12-13 17:19 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2024-12-12 23:10 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-12-12 23:10 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-12-12 23:11 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-12-12 23:38 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-12-12 23:42 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-12-12 23:45 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-12-13 0:12 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-12-13 7:03 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2024-12-14 0:54 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa [this message]
2024-12-14 1:08 ` [PATCH] " Dixit, Ashutosh
2024-12-16 22:48 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2024-12-17 2:17 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z1zXUdMPUGQVO5yJ@orsosgc001 \
--to=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
--cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox