From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>, <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>,
<lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: "Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Michael J. Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Tejas Upadhyay" <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>,
"Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/vsec: enforce CONFIG_INTEL_VSEC dependency
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 13:52:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z2HIW4c-S_IA9bWb@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241217071852.2261858-1-arnd@kernel.org>
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 08:18:44AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> When INTEL_VSEC is in a loadable module, XE cannot be built-in any more:
>
> x86_64-linux-ld: vmlinux.o: in function `xe_vsec_init':
> (.text+0x19861bf): undefined reference to `intel_vsec_register'
>
> This could be enforced using a 'depends on INTEL_VSEC || !INTEL_VSEC'
> style dependency to allow building with VSEC completely disabled.
> My impression here is that this was not actually intended, and that
> continuing to support that combination would lead to more build bugs.
>
> Instead, make it a hard dependency as all other INTEL_VSEC users are,
> and remove the inline stub alternative. This leads to a dependency
> on CONFIG_X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES, so the 'select' has to be removed
> to avoid a circular dependency.
>
I really don't want us to hard lock this X86 dependency here.
What if we add a new DRM_XE_DGFX_PMT_SUPPORT and that
depends on INTEL_VSEC ?
and our if statement changes to
if (IS_ENABLED(DRM_XE_DGFX_PMT_SUPPORT)
We could even leave this enabled by default, but at least
it is an easy path to someone willing to run experiments
without depending on X86 I believe...
Cc: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Fixes: 0c45e76fcc62 ("drm/xe/vsec: Support BMG devices")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig | 2 +-
> include/linux/intel_vsec.h | 7 -------
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig
> index 6c5b665d9384..217b51468497 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> config DRM_XE
> tristate "Intel Xe Graphics"
> depends on DRM && PCI && MMU && (m || (y && KUNIT=y))
> + depends on INTEL_VSEC
> select INTERVAL_TREE
> # we need shmfs for the swappable backing store, and in particular
> # the shmem_readpage() which depends upon tmpfs
> @@ -28,7 +29,6 @@ config DRM_XE
> select INPUT if ACPI
> select ACPI_VIDEO if X86 && ACPI
> select ACPI_BUTTON if ACPI
> - select X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES if X86 && ACPI
> select ACPI_WMI if X86 && ACPI
> select SYNC_FILE
> select IOSF_MBI
> diff --git a/include/linux/intel_vsec.h b/include/linux/intel_vsec.h
> index b94beab64610..f2d55e686476 100644
> --- a/include/linux/intel_vsec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/intel_vsec.h
> @@ -138,13 +138,6 @@ static inline struct intel_vsec_device *auxdev_to_ivdev(struct auxiliary_device
> return container_of(auxdev, struct intel_vsec_device, auxdev);
> }
>
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_VSEC)
> void intel_vsec_register(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> struct intel_vsec_platform_info *info);
> -#else
> -static inline void intel_vsec_register(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> - struct intel_vsec_platform_info *info)
> -{
> -}
> -#endif
> #endif
> --
> 2.39.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-17 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-17 7:18 [PATCH] drm/xe/vsec: enforce CONFIG_INTEL_VSEC dependency Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-17 8:00 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for " Patchwork
2024-12-17 18:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-12-17 19:28 ` [PATCH] " Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-17 19:48 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-12-17 20:14 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-12-17 20:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z2HIW4c-S_IA9bWb@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox