From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55DC1C02187 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 13:28:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D228D10E961; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 13:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="VZx7btnJ"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55F9010E961 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 13:28:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1737034121; x=1768570121; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=s9DlBp6SPnvR5iyEU3RjaSaSAqsIgQixW92n6VsVI7E=; b=VZx7btnJmKlF61LsE3aCPkVQ4ARRjQj4YbstG79ljrEAwTKYQPoq5ZUv D/1tX+am2FtGZWATeq3pR4yur8qf9QW7fYirjF8pQZxUa1EGyA08ZUXt/ OsZTdbgKknmhjNgzTr2TraRgjvVyEpT+HtUtaXDtP5x4XXbBHR1y6wLou 6TEHxMQIQjxx5eavdnYlrZbLBxPVi+/T2ppG2n3bhRatw1h36UP48OW4E O2POJ8MG07HIiCtMlRqoCtRKSbR3AaAS3sXaHoLWOMKQVI7ZSts17fYGb +4eZSKrosrBhoi0ODBz39GieK4yBC2h9ZFhgTvPvEpn8bFcpq5PPbzg39 g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: qK1c9NloRRalC/Nn21bC0A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: HbT7Y20CRbucxsxBs2zjfg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11316"; a="37574288" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,209,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="37574288" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jan 2025 05:28:40 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Ypj6R5ogTJaKiArSkxWNxA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: GSdQ4r1KRVK5Yi2VF+rtiw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,209,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="110472847" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jan 2025 05:28:39 -0800 Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:28:36 +0200 From: Raag Jadav To: Sai Teja Pottumuttu Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.d.roper@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Refactor dma_mask_size Message-ID: References: <20250116125447.4025927-1-sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com> <20250116125447.4025927-2-sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250116125447.4025927-2-sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com> X-BeenThere: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Xe graphics driver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-xe" On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 06:24:46PM +0530, Sai Teja Pottumuttu wrote: > dma_mask_size is more related to the platform than the GT IP. Nit: Unless there's uncertainty intended here, I'd drop 'more' and make it definitive. Raag