From: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Add missing SPDX license identifiers
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:30:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4kYG7ZFE71cLBZw@fdugast-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <u7wm5gyzznr7obtgmnrnafh4lliyqgxvx5umg6o2iqxmxscc5j@wnctmzdwxk7t>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 08:26:36AM -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 01:45:32PM +0100, Francois Dugast wrote:
> > Ensure all Xe driver files have a proper SPDX license identifier, add it
> > in files where it was missing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig.profile | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/gem/i915_gem_stolen.h | 5 +++++
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig.profile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig.profile
> > index ba17a25e8db3..7530df998148 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig.profile
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig.profile
> > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > config DRM_XE_JOB_TIMEOUT_MAX
> > int "Default max job timeout (ms)"
> > default 10000 # milliseconds
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/gem/i915_gem_stolen.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/gem/i915_gem_stolen.h
> > index cb6c7598824b..a1ff59288a3d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/gem/i915_gem_stolen.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/gem/i915_gem_stolen.h
> > @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright © 2024 Intel Corporation
>
> ^2025
>
> otherwise, Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
As this should have been there since initial commit, should we not use
year of file creation according to git log, rather than current year?
Francois
>
> Lucas De Marchi
>
> > + */
> > +
> > #ifndef _I915_GEM_STOLEN_H_
> > #define _I915_GEM_STOLEN_H_
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-16 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-16 12:45 [PATCH] drm/xe: Add missing SPDX license identifiers Francois Dugast
2025-01-16 12:52 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2025-01-16 12:53 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-01-16 12:54 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-01-16 13:12 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-01-16 13:14 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-01-16 13:16 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-01-16 13:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-01-16 14:26 ` [PATCH] " Lucas De Marchi
2025-01-16 14:30 ` Francois Dugast [this message]
2025-01-16 16:50 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-01-16 23:39 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z4kYG7ZFE71cLBZw@fdugast-desk \
--to=francois.dugast@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox