Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>, <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	<airlied@gmail.com>,  <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	<simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>, <felix.kuehling@amd.com>,
	<dakr@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 28/33] drm/xe: Add SVM VRAM migration
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 09:31:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z5u3YyxWSGvDONl5@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <93473543-9536-46f2-aabb-ee5e4dca60cc@intel.com>

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 04:56:39PM +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 30/01/2025 16:32, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 02:22:55PM +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > > On 29/01/2025 19:52, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > > Migration is implemented with range granularity, with VRAM backing being
> > > > a VM private TTM BO (i.e., shares dma-resv with VM). The lifetime of the
> > > > TTM BO is limited to when the SVM range is in VRAM (i.e., when a VRAM
> > > > SVM range is migrated to SRAM, the TTM BO is destroyed).
> > > > 
> > > > The design choice for using TTM BO for VRAM backing store, as opposed to
> > > > direct buddy allocation, is as follows:
> > > > 
> > > > - DRM buddy allocations are not at page granularity, offering no
> > > >     advantage over a BO.
> > > > - Unified eviction is required (SVM VRAM and TTM BOs need to be able to
> > > >     evict each other).
> > > > - For exhaustive eviction [1], SVM VRAM allocations will almost certainly
> > > >     require a dma-resv.
> > > > - Likely allocation size is 2M which makes of size of BO (872)
> > > >     acceptable per allocation (872 / 2M == .0004158).
> > > > 
> > > > With this, using TTM BO for VRAM backing store seems to be an obvious
> > > > choice as it allows leveraging of the TTM eviction code.
> > > > 
> > > > Current migration policy is migrate any SVM range greater than or equal
> > > > to 64k once.
> > > > 
> > > > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/133643/
> > > > 
> > > > v2:
> > > >    - Rebase on latest GPU SVM
> > > >    - Retry page fault on get pages returning mixed allocation
> > > >    - Use drm_gpusvm_devmem
> > > > v3:
> > > >    - Use new BO flags
> > > >    - New range structure (Thomas)
> > > >    - Hide migration behind Kconfig
> > > >    - Kernel doc (Thomas)
> > > >    - Use check_pages_threshold
> > > > v4:
> > > >    - Don't evict partial unmaps in garbage collector (Thomas)
> > > >    - Use %pe to print errors (Thomas)
> > > >    - Use %p to print pointers (Thomas)
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h |  5 ++
> > > >    2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> > > > index ba1db030bf33..fc030855d078 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> > > > @@ -502,7 +502,6 @@ static int xe_svm_populate_devmem_pfn(struct drm_gpusvm_devmem *devmem_allocatio
> > > >    	return 0;
> > > >    }
> > > > -__maybe_unused
> > > >    static const struct drm_gpusvm_devmem_ops gpusvm_devmem_ops = {
> > > >    	.devmem_release = xe_svm_devmem_release,
> > > >    	.populate_devmem_pfn = xe_svm_populate_devmem_pfn,
> > > > @@ -582,6 +581,64 @@ static bool xe_svm_range_is_valid(struct xe_svm_range *range,
> > > >    	return (range->tile_present & ~range->tile_invalidated) & BIT(tile->id);
> > > >    }
> > > > +static struct xe_mem_region *tile_to_mr(struct xe_tile *tile)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	return &tile->mem.vram;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static struct xe_bo *xe_svm_alloc_vram(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_tile *tile,
> > > > +				       struct xe_svm_range *range,
> > > > +				       const struct drm_gpusvm_ctx *ctx)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct xe_mem_region *mr = tile_to_mr(tile);
> > > > +	struct drm_buddy_block *block;
> > > > +	struct list_head *blocks;
> > > > +	struct xe_bo *bo;
> > > > +	ktime_t end = 0;
> > > > +	int err;
> > > > +
> > > > +retry:
> > > > +	xe_vm_lock(vm, false);
> > > > +	bo = xe_bo_create(tile_to_xe(tile), tile, vm, range->base.itree.last + 1 -
> > > > +			  range->base.itree.start, ttm_bo_type_device,
> > > > +			  XE_BO_FLAG_VRAM_IF_DGFX(tile) |
> > > > +			  XE_BO_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_MIRROR);
> > > > +	xe_vm_unlock(vm);
> > > 
> > > What was the trick again to ensure eviction is not triggered at this point?
> > > I thought there was some trick with eviction_valuable() but I can't find it.
> > > 
> > 
> > I dropped that given the hacky nature of how it was implemented. Yes, it
> > is possible that we allocate VRAM and it is immediately evicted before
> > the bind occurs but in practice should never really happen given this BO
> > should be the last entry on the LRU list. Even if this happens, I
> > believe this is harmless given the bind will abort and trigger a retry.
> 
> Looking at xe_svm_bo_evict() it wants to use stuff like
> bo->devmem_allocation, but that is not set up yet?  For example
> dereferencing the devmem_allocation->mm from there will potentially hit a
> NPD?

Good catch. I think drm_gpusvm_devmem_init at least needs to be moved
under BO's dma resv lock.

The multi-GPU work Thomas is doing will even expand this scope further
to include drm_gpusvm_migrate_to_devmem under the BO dma-resv too - this
was ommitted in this series given we'd have to rework the mmap read lock
a bit too which I'd prefer to wait on until his series.

Matt

> 
> > 
> > Matt
> > 
> > > > +	if (IS_ERR(bo)) {
> > > > +		err = PTR_ERR(bo);
> > > > +		if (xe_vm_validate_should_retry(NULL, err, &end))
> > > > +			goto retry;
> > > > +		return bo;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	drm_gpusvm_devmem_init(&bo->devmem_allocation,
> > > > +			       vm->xe->drm.dev, vm->svm.gpusvm.mm,
> > > > +			       &gpusvm_devmem_ops,
> > > > +			       &tile->mem.vram.dpagemap,
> > > > +			       range->base.itree.last + 1 -
> > > > +			       range->base.itree.start);
> > > > +
> > > > +	blocks = &to_xe_ttm_vram_mgr_resource(bo->ttm.resource)->blocks;
> > > > +	list_for_each_entry(block, blocks, link)
> > > > +		block->private = mr;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * Take ref because as soon as drm_gpusvm_migrate_to_devmem succeeds the
> > > > +	 * creation ref can be dropped upon CPU fault or unmap.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	xe_bo_get(bo);
> > > > +
> > > > +	err = drm_gpusvm_migrate_to_devmem(&vm->svm.gpusvm, &range->base,
> > > > +					   &bo->devmem_allocation, ctx);
> > > > +	if (err) {
> > > > +		xe_bo_put(bo);	/* Local ref */
> > > > +		xe_bo_put(bo);	/* Creation ref */
> > > > +		return ERR_PTR(err);
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	return bo;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >    /**
> > > >     * xe_svm_handle_pagefault() - SVM handle page fault
> > > >     * @vm: The VM.
> > > > @@ -590,7 +647,8 @@ static bool xe_svm_range_is_valid(struct xe_svm_range *range,
> > > >     * @fault_addr: The GPU fault address.
> > > >     * @atomic: The fault atomic access bit.
> > > >     *
> > > > - * Create GPU bindings for a SVM page fault.
> > > > + * Create GPU bindings for a SVM page fault. Optionally migrate to device
> > > > + * memory.
> > > >     *
> > > >     * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on error.
> > > >     */
> > > > @@ -598,11 +656,18 @@ int xe_svm_handle_pagefault(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma *vma,
> > > >    			    struct xe_tile *tile, u64 fault_addr,
> > > >    			    bool atomic)
> > > >    {
> > > > -	struct drm_gpusvm_ctx ctx = { .read_only = xe_vma_read_only(vma), };
> > > > +	struct drm_gpusvm_ctx ctx = {
> > > > +		.read_only = xe_vma_read_only(vma),
> > > > +		.devmem_possible = IS_DGFX(vm->xe) &&
> > > > +			IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEVMEM_MIRROR),
> > > > +		.check_pages_threshold = IS_DGFX(vm->xe) &&
> > > > +			IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEVMEM_MIRROR) ? SZ_64K : 0,
> > > > +	};
> > > >    	struct xe_svm_range *range;
> > > >    	struct drm_gpusvm_range *r;
> > > >    	struct drm_exec exec;
> > > >    	struct dma_fence *fence;
> > > > +	struct xe_bo *bo = NULL;
> > > >    	ktime_t end = 0;
> > > >    	int err;
> > > > @@ -610,6 +675,9 @@ int xe_svm_handle_pagefault(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma *vma,
> > > >    	xe_assert(vm->xe, xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma));
> > > >    retry:
> > > > +	xe_bo_put(bo);
> > > > +	bo = NULL;
> > > > +
> > > >    	/* Always process UNMAPs first so view SVM ranges is current */
> > > >    	err = xe_svm_garbage_collector(vm);
> > > >    	if (err)
> > > > @@ -625,9 +693,31 @@ int xe_svm_handle_pagefault(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma *vma,
> > > >    	if (xe_svm_range_is_valid(range, tile))
> > > >    		return 0;
> > > > +	/* XXX: Add migration policy, for now migrate range once */
> > > > +	if (!range->migrated && range->base.flags.migrate_devmem &&
> > > > +	    (range->base.itree.last + 1 - range->base.itree.start) >= SZ_64K) {
> > > > +		range->migrated = true;
> > > > +
> > > > +		bo = xe_svm_alloc_vram(vm, tile, range, &ctx);
> > > > +		if (IS_ERR(bo)) {
> > > > +			drm_info(&vm->xe->drm,
> > > > +				 "VRAM allocation failed, falling back to retrying, asid=%u, errno %pe\n",
> > > > +				 vm->usm.asid, bo);
> > > > +			bo = NULL;
> > > > +			goto retry;
> > > > +		}
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > >    	err = drm_gpusvm_range_get_pages(&vm->svm.gpusvm, r, &ctx);
> > > > -	if (err == -EFAULT || err == -EPERM)	/* Corner where CPU mappings have changed */
> > > > +	/* Corner where CPU mappings have changed */
> > > > +	if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP || err == -EFAULT || err == -EPERM) {
> > > > +		if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> > > > +			drm_gpusvm_range_evict(&vm->svm.gpusvm, &range->base);
> > > > +		drm_info(&vm->xe->drm,
> > > > +			 "Get pages failed, falling back to retrying, asid=%u, gpusvm=%p, errno %pe\n",
> > > > +			 vm->usm.asid, &vm->svm.gpusvm, ERR_PTR(err));
> > > >    		goto retry;
> > > > +	}
> > > >    	if (err)
> > > >    		goto err_out;
> > > > @@ -658,6 +748,7 @@ int xe_svm_handle_pagefault(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma *vma,
> > > >    	dma_fence_put(fence);
> > > >    err_out:
> > > > +	xe_bo_put(bo);
> > > >    	return err;
> > > >    }
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> > > > index 63daffdfdbf6..4c2576162c39 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> > > > @@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ struct xe_svm_range {
> > > >    	 * range. Protected by GPU SVM notifier lock.
> > > >    	 */
> > > >    	u8 tile_invalidated;
> > > > +	/**
> > > > +	 * @migrated: Range has been migrated to device memory, protected by
> > > > +	 * GPU fault handler locking.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	u8 migrated	:1;
> > > >    };
> > > >    int xe_devm_add(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_mem_region *mr);
> > > 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-30 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-29 19:51 [PATCH v4 00/33] Introduce GPU SVM and Xe SVM implementation Matthew Brost
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 01/33] drm/xe: Retry BO allocation Matthew Brost
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 02/33] mm/migrate: Add migrate_device_pfns Matthew Brost
2025-01-31  5:24   ` Alistair Popple
2025-01-31  7:47   ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2025-02-04 22:17     ` Matthew Brost
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 03/33] mm/migrate: Trylock device page in do_swap_page Matthew Brost
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 04/33] drm/pagemap: Add DRM pagemap Matthew Brost
2025-02-07  8:34   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-02-10 18:41     ` Matthew Brost
2025-02-11 16:03       ` Thomas Hellström
2025-02-11 18:17         ` Matthew Brost
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 05/33] drm/xe/bo: Introduce xe_bo_put_async Matthew Brost
2025-01-30  8:49   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-30 16:26     ` Matthew Brost
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 06/33] drm/gpusvm: Add support for GPU Shared Virtual Memory Matthew Brost
2025-01-30  9:13   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-30 11:17   ` Matthew Auld
2025-01-30 13:13     ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2025-01-30 16:42       ` Matthew Brost
2025-02-07  9:06   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-02-10 17:31     ` Matthew Brost
2025-02-11 15:17       ` Thomas Hellström
2025-02-11 18:05         ` Matthew Brost
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 07/33] drm/xe: Select DRM_GPUSVM Kconfig Matthew Brost
2025-02-07  3:18   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-07  9:30   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 08/33] drm/xe/uapi: Add DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_MIRROR flag Matthew Brost
2025-02-07  9:37   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-02-07 12:11   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-07 13:47     ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2025-02-10 19:08       ` Matthew Brost
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 09/33] drm/xe: Add SVM init / close / fini to faulting VMs Matthew Brost
2025-02-07  3:24   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-07  9:43   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 10/33] drm/xe: Add dma_addr res cursor Matthew Brost
2025-02-10 19:11   ` Matthew Brost
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 11/33] drm/xe: Nuke VM's mapping upon close Matthew Brost
2025-01-30 10:50   ` Matthew Auld
2025-01-30 16:28     ` Matthew Brost
2025-02-07 10:15   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-02-10 19:16     ` Matthew Brost
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 12/33] drm/xe: Add SVM range invalidation and page fault handler Matthew Brost
2025-02-07 10:32   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 13/33] drm/gpuvm: Add DRM_GPUVA_OP_DRIVER Matthew Brost
2025-02-07 10:36   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 14/33] drm/xe: Add (re)bind to SVM page fault handler Matthew Brost
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 15/33] drm/xe: Add SVM garbage collector Matthew Brost
2025-02-07 12:42   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 16/33] drm/xe: Add unbind to " Matthew Brost
2025-02-07 12:55   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-02-10 21:17     ` Matthew Brost
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 17/33] drm/xe: Do not allow CPU address mirror VMA unbind if the GPU has bindings Matthew Brost
2025-02-07 13:01   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 18/33] drm/xe: Enable CPU address mirror uAPI Matthew Brost
2025-02-07 13:02   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 19/33] drm/xe/uapi: Add DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAG_HAS_CPU_ADDR_MIRROR Matthew Brost
2025-02-07 11:35   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-07 11:35   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-07 13:04   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-02-07 13:43     ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2025-02-10 19:15       ` Matthew Brost
2025-01-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 20/33] drm/xe: Add migrate layer functions for SVM support Matthew Brost
2025-02-07 13:07   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-29 19:52 ` [PATCH v4 21/33] drm/xe: Add SVM device memory mirroring Matthew Brost
2025-02-07 13:29   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-29 19:52 ` [PATCH v4 22/33] drm/xe: Add drm_gpusvm_devmem to xe_bo Matthew Brost
2025-01-29 19:52 ` [PATCH v4 23/33] drm/xe: Add drm_pagemap ops to SVM Matthew Brost
2025-01-30 10:54   ` Matthew Auld
2025-01-30 13:24     ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2025-01-30 16:24       ` Matthew Brost
2025-01-29 19:52 ` [PATCH v4 24/33] drm/xe: Add GPUSVM device memory copy vfunc functions Matthew Brost
2025-02-07 13:32   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-29 19:52 ` [PATCH v4 25/33] drm/xe: Add Xe SVM populate_devmem_pfn GPU SVM vfunc Matthew Brost
2025-01-29 19:52 ` [PATCH v4 26/33] drm/xe: Add Xe SVM devmem_release " Matthew Brost
2025-01-29 19:52 ` [PATCH v4 27/33] drm/xe: Add BO flags required for SVM Matthew Brost
2025-02-07 13:54   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-02-11 19:19     ` Matthew Brost
2025-02-11 19:36       ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-29 19:52 ` [PATCH v4 28/33] drm/xe: Add SVM VRAM migration Matthew Brost
2025-01-30 14:22   ` Matthew Auld
2025-01-30 16:32     ` Matthew Brost
2025-01-30 16:41       ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-30 16:56       ` Matthew Auld
2025-01-30 17:31         ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2025-01-30 18:51           ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-31 17:30             ` Matthew Brost
2025-02-07 13:57   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-29 19:52 ` [PATCH v4 29/33] drm/xe: Basic SVM BO eviction Matthew Brost
2025-02-07 14:45   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-02-11 19:21     ` Matthew Brost
2025-01-29 19:52 ` [PATCH v4 30/33] drm/xe: Add SVM debug Matthew Brost
2025-02-07 14:46   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-29 19:52 ` [PATCH v4 31/33] drm/xe: Add modparam for SVM notifier size Matthew Brost
2025-02-07 14:48   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-29 19:52 ` [PATCH v4 32/33] drm/xe: Add always_migrate_to_vram modparam Matthew Brost
2025-02-07 14:50   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-29 19:52 ` [PATCH v4 33/33] drm/doc: gpusvm: Add GPU SVM documentation Matthew Brost
2025-02-07 14:54   ` Thomas Hellström
2025-01-29 21:04 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Introduce GPU SVM and Xe SVM implementation (rev4) Patchwork
2025-01-29 21:05 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-01-29 21:06 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
2025-01-30 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 00/33] Introduce GPU SVM and Xe SVM implementation Gwan-gyeong Mun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z5u3YyxWSGvDONl5@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
    --cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox