From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/lspcon: change signature of lspcon_wait_pcon_mode()
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 17:58:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6KbmjHjZkkRajai@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84a00791d3d7ee4e34c1224ef7471918546635aa.1738677489.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 03:58:41PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Switch from struct intel_lspcon to struct intel_digital_port to unify.
in the previous patch and in this one I'm asking myself if we
are not going to the opposite direction that we should...
and make the lspcon component to use lspcon structs as entry
but looking to the patch itself the code gets cleaner because
digport is an information that is broadly available. So, let's
continue:
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 3 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c | 4 +++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.h | 4 +---
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 2db7741c25bd..14d81538c912 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -3501,7 +3501,6 @@ void intel_dp_set_power(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 mode)
> ret = drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER, mode);
> } else {
> struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> - struct intel_lspcon *lspcon = dp_to_lspcon(intel_dp);
>
> lspcon_resume(dig_port);
>
> @@ -3520,7 +3519,7 @@ void intel_dp_set_power(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 mode)
> }
>
> if (ret == 1 && intel_lspcon_active(dig_port))
> - lspcon_wait_pcon_mode(lspcon);
> + lspcon_wait_pcon_mode(dig_port);
> }
>
> if (ret != 1)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c
> index 2dd2b700b0f3..45b63fea3642 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c
> @@ -656,8 +656,10 @@ u32 lspcon_infoframes_enabled(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> return val;
> }
>
> -void lspcon_wait_pcon_mode(struct intel_lspcon *lspcon)
> +void lspcon_wait_pcon_mode(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> {
> + struct intel_lspcon *lspcon = &dig_port->lspcon;
> +
> lspcon_wait_mode(lspcon, DRM_LSPCON_MODE_PCON);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.h
> index 18cc15e5221d..20581af1ddb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.h
> @@ -8,18 +8,16 @@
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> -struct drm_connector;
> struct drm_connector_state;
> struct intel_crtc_state;
> struct intel_digital_port;
> struct intel_encoder;
> -struct intel_lspcon;
>
> bool lspcon_init(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
> bool intel_lspcon_active(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
> bool lspcon_detect_hdr_capability(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
> void lspcon_resume(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
> -void lspcon_wait_pcon_mode(struct intel_lspcon *lspcon);
> +void lspcon_wait_pcon_mode(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
> void lspcon_write_infoframe(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> unsigned int type,
> --
> 2.39.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-04 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-04 13:58 [PATCH v2 0/6] drm/i915/lspcon: interface cleanups Jani Nikula
2025-02-04 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915/hdmi: move declarations for hsw_read/write_infoframe() to the right place Jani Nikula
2025-02-04 22:55 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-04 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915/lspcon: add intel_lspcon_active() and use it Jani Nikula
2025-02-04 22:55 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-04 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915/lspcon: change signature of lspcon_detect_hdr_capability() Jani Nikula
2025-02-04 22:57 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-04 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/lspcon: change signature of lspcon_wait_pcon_mode() Jani Nikula
2025-02-04 22:58 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-02-05 17:53 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-04 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/lspcon: remove dp_to_lspcon(), hide enc_to_intel_lspcon() Jani Nikula
2025-02-04 22:59 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-04 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/i915/lspcon: rename interfaces to intel_lspcon_* to unify Jani Nikula
2025-02-04 22:59 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-04 17:48 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/lspcon: interface cleanups Patchwork
2025-02-04 17:48 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-02-04 17:49 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-02-04 18:06 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-04 18:08 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-04 18:09 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-04 18:31 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-02-04 21:55 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6KbmjHjZkkRajai@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox