From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
Cc: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>,
"Poosa, Karthik" <karthik.poosa@intel.com>,
<lucas.demarchi@intel.com>, <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
<andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<anshuman.gupta@intel.com>, <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xe/hwmon: expose package and vram temperature
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 18:45:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6Kms_pJxvKJpoL5@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cce1eb5a-b738-4283-8d3d-e782da14067a@intel.com>
On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 11:57:20AM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
>
>
> On 2/1/2025 12:07 PM, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 08:13:15PM +0530, Poosa, Karthik wrote:
> > > On 31-01-2025 11:15, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > > Add hwmon support for temp2_input and temp3_input attributes, which will
> > >
> > > Add hwmon support for temp2_input and temp3_input attributes for supported platforms
> > >
> > > > expose package and vram temperature in millidegree Celsius. With this in
> > > > place we can monitor temperature using lm-sensors tool.
> > >
> > > With these changes, package and vram temperatures can be monitored using lm-sensors tool.
> >
> > That's pretty much what it already says, doesn't it?
> >
> > > > v2: Reuse existing channels (Badal, Karthik)
> > > Add a new channel for VRAM temperature, channel 3.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav<raag.jadav@intel.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti<andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel-xe-hwmon | 16 +++++
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_mchbar_regs.h | 3 +
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_pcode_regs.h | 2 +
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 4 files changed, 81 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel-xe-hwmon b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel-xe-hwmon
> > > > index d792a56f59ac..9bce281314df 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel-xe-hwmon
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel-xe-hwmon
> > > > @@ -108,3 +108,19 @@ Contact: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > Description: RO. Package current voltage in millivolt.
> > > > Only supported for particular Intel Xe graphics platforms.
> > > > +
> > > > +What: /sys/bus/pci/drivers/xe/.../hwmon/hwmon<i>/temp2_input
> > > > +Date: March 2025
> > >
> > > January 2025,
> > >
> > > February 2025, if there is a next revision after v2
> > >
> > > > +KernelVersion: 6.14
> > > > +Contact: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > +Description: RO. Package temperature in millidegree Celsius.
> > > > +
> > > > + Only supported for particular Intel Xe graphics platforms.
> > > > +
> > > > +What: /sys/bus/pci/drivers/xe/.../hwmon/hwmon<i>/temp3_input
> > > > +Date: March 2025
> > >
> > > January 2025
> > >
> > > February 2025, if there is a next revision after v2
> >
> > Something to follow: https://hansen.beer/~dave/phb/
> >
> > > > +KernelVersion: 6.14
> > > > +Contact: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > +Description: RO. VRAM temperature in millidegree Celsius.
> > > > +
> > > > + Only supported for particular Intel Xe graphics platforms.
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_mchbar_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_mchbar_regs.h
> > > > index 519dd1067a19..f5e5234857c1 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_mchbar_regs.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_mchbar_regs.h
> > > > @@ -34,6 +34,9 @@
> > > > #define PCU_CR_PACKAGE_ENERGY_STATUS XE_REG(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x593c)
> > > > +#define PCU_CR_PACKAGE_TEMPERATURE XE_REG(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5978)
> > > > +#define TEMP_MASK REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
> > > TEMP_MASK -> TEMPERATURE_MASK
> >
> > This is consistent with other GENMASK() macros here.
> >
> > > > #define PCU_CR_PACKAGE_RAPL_LIMIT XE_REG(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x59a0)
> > > > #define PKG_PWR_LIM_1 REG_GENMASK(14, 0)
> > > > #define PKG_PWR_LIM_1_EN REG_BIT(15)
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_pcode_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_pcode_regs.h
> > > > index 0b0b49d850ae..8846eb9ce2a4 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_pcode_regs.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_pcode_regs.h
> > > > @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
> > > > #define BMG_PACKAGE_POWER_SKU XE_REG(0x138098)
> > > > #define BMG_PACKAGE_POWER_SKU_UNIT XE_REG(0x1380dc)
> > > > #define BMG_PACKAGE_ENERGY_STATUS XE_REG(0x138120)
> > > > +#define BMG_VRAM_TEMPERATURE XE_REG(0x1382c0)
> > > > +#define BMG_PACKAGE_TEMPERATURE XE_REG(0x138434)
> > > > #define BMG_PACKAGE_RAPL_LIMIT XE_REG(0x138440)
> > > > #define BMG_PLATFORM_ENERGY_STATUS XE_REG(0x138458)
> > > > #define BMG_PLATFORM_POWER_LIMIT XE_REG(0x138460)
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> > > > index fde56dad3ab7..7f327e334212 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> > > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > > > #include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
> > > > #include <linux/hwmon.h>
> > > > #include <linux/types.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/units.h>
> > > > #include <drm/drm_managed.h>
> > > > #include "regs/xe_gt_regs.h"
> > > > @@ -20,6 +21,7 @@
> > > > #include "xe_pm.h"
> > > > enum xe_hwmon_reg {
> > > > + REG_TEMP,
> > >
> > > Any specific reason for adding this at the beginning of enum ?
> >
> > This follows the ordering of enum hwmon_sensor_types (as the rest of the patch).
> >
> > > Generally addition is at the end for any new enums.
> > >
> > > > REG_PKG_RAPL_LIMIT,
> > > > REG_PKG_POWER_SKU,
> > > > REG_PKG_POWER_SKU_UNIT,
> > > > @@ -36,6 +38,7 @@ enum xe_hwmon_reg_operation {
> > > > enum xe_hwmon_channel {
> > > > CHANNEL_CARD,
> > > > CHANNEL_PKG,
> > > > + CHANNEL_VRAM,
> > > > CHANNEL_MAX,
> > > > };
> > > > @@ -84,6 +87,19 @@ static struct xe_reg xe_hwmon_get_reg(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, enum xe_hwmon_reg
> > > > struct xe_device *xe = hwmon->xe;
> > > > switch (hwmon_reg) {
> > > > + case REG_TEMP:
> > > > + if (xe->info.platform == XE_BATTLEMAGE) {
> > > > + if (channel == CHANNEL_PKG)
> > > > + return BMG_PACKAGE_TEMPERATURE;
> > > > + else if (channel == CHANNEL_VRAM)
> > > > + return BMG_VRAM_TEMPERATURE;
> > > > + } else if (xe->info.platform == XE_DG2) {
> > > > + if (channel == CHANNEL_PKG)
> > > > + return PCU_CR_PACKAGE_TEMPERATURE;
> > > > + else if (channel == CHANNEL_VRAM)
> > > > + return BMG_VRAM_TEMPERATURE;
> > >
> > > This doesn't look good.
> > >
> > > Can you add PCU_CR_VRAM_TEMPERATURE with same offset in
> > > xe/regs/xe_mchbar_regs.h ?
> >
> > It's not mchbar register.
>
> add it under the same file without the bmg prefix.
>
> The other registers are platform specific and have the prefix.
> This is common and can have the PCU prefix
No, but the point of the xe_mchbar_reg itself is to only
include registers that are from the mchbar.
Although the code here looks strange and misaligned, the
registers are well aligned and its right place.
>
> Thanks
> Riana
> >
> > > > + }
> > > > + break;
> > > > case REG_PKG_RAPL_LIMIT:
> > > > if (xe->info.platform == XE_BATTLEMAGE) {
> > > > if (channel == CHANNEL_PKG)
> > > > @@ -431,6 +447,8 @@ static const struct attribute_group *hwmon_groups[] = {
> > > > };
> > > > static const struct hwmon_channel_info * const hwmon_info[] = {
> > > > + HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(temp, HWMON_T_LABEL, HWMON_T_INPUT | HWMON_T_LABEL,
> > > > + HWMON_T_INPUT | HWMON_T_LABEL),
> > > > HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(power, HWMON_P_MAX | HWMON_P_RATED_MAX | HWMON_P_LABEL,
> > > > HWMON_P_MAX | HWMON_P_RATED_MAX | HWMON_P_CRIT | HWMON_P_LABEL),
> > > > HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(curr, HWMON_C_LABEL, HWMON_C_CRIT | HWMON_C_LABEL),
> > > > @@ -506,6 +524,36 @@ static void xe_hwmon_get_voltage(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, int channel, long *valu
> > > > *value = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(REG_FIELD_GET(VOLTAGE_MASK, reg_val) * 2500, SF_VOLTAGE);
> > > > }
> > > > +static umode_t
> > > > +xe_hwmon_temp_is_visible(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, u32 attr, int channel)
> > > > +{
> > > > + switch (attr) {
> > > > + case hwmon_temp_input:
> > > > + case hwmon_temp_label:
> > > > + return xe_reg_is_valid(xe_hwmon_get_reg(hwmon, REG_TEMP, channel)) ? 0444 : 0;
> > > > + default:
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > + }
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int
> > > > +xe_hwmon_temp_read(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, u32 attr, int channel, long *val)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct xe_mmio *mmio = xe_root_tile_mmio(hwmon->xe);
> > > > + u64 reg_val;
> > > > +
> > > > + switch (attr) {
> > > > + case hwmon_temp_input:
> > > > + reg_val = xe_mmio_read32(mmio, xe_hwmon_get_reg(hwmon, REG_TEMP, channel));
> > > > +
> > > > + /* HW register value is in degrees Celsius, convert to millidegrees. */
> > > > + *val = REG_FIELD_GET(TEMP_MASK, reg_val) * MILLIDEGREE_PER_DEGREE;
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > + default:
> > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > Can you add debug log, printing the unsupported attr ?
> >
> > We don't have it for others, anything special about this one?
> >
> > Raag
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-04 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-31 5:45 [PATCH v2] drm/xe/hwmon: expose package and vram temperature Raag Jadav
2025-01-31 6:29 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/hwmon: expose package and vram temperature (rev2) Patchwork
2025-01-31 6:30 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 6:31 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 6:47 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 6:49 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 6:51 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 7:22 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 10:04 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-01-31 13:35 ` [PATCH v2] drm/xe/hwmon: expose package and vram temperature Andi Shyti
2025-02-05 17:50 ` Raag Jadav
2025-02-06 10:48 ` Andi Shyti
2025-01-31 13:54 ` Nilawar, Badal
2025-01-31 14:43 ` Poosa, Karthik
2025-02-01 6:37 ` Raag Jadav
2025-02-03 6:27 ` Riana Tauro
2025-02-04 23:45 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-02-05 7:10 ` Riana Tauro
2025-02-05 12:02 ` Raag Jadav
2025-02-05 13:51 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-05 15:31 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-05 17:29 ` Raag Jadav
2025-02-06 15:32 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6Kms_pJxvKJpoL5@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=karthik.poosa@intel.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox