From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: "Ghimiray, Himal Prasad" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <apopple@nvidia.com>,
<airlied@gmail.com>, <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
<simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>, <felix.kuehling@amd.com>,
<dakr@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 27/32] drm/xe: Add SVM VRAM migration
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 19:05:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z7VKgVlwmVOz4wKP@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91cb5b9b-84cc-4651-8d28-973650eb7c69@intel.com>
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 08:29:53AM +0530, Ghimiray, Himal Prasad wrote:
>
>
> On 19-02-2025 03:24, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 11:58:27PM +0530, Ghimiray, Himal Prasad wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 13-02-2025 07:41, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > > Migration is implemented with range granularity, with VRAM backing being
> > > > a VM private TTM BO (i.e., shares dma-resv with VM). The lifetime of the
> > > > TTM BO is limited to when the SVM range is in VRAM (i.e., when a VRAM
> > > > SVM range is migrated to SRAM, the TTM BO is destroyed).
> > > >
> > > > The design choice for using TTM BO for VRAM backing store, as opposed to
> > > > direct buddy allocation, is as follows:
> > > >
> > > > - DRM buddy allocations are not at page granularity, offering no
> > > > advantage over a BO.
> > > > - Unified eviction is required (SVM VRAM and TTM BOs need to be able to
> > > > evict each other).
> > > > - For exhaustive eviction [1], SVM VRAM allocations will almost certainly
> > > > require a dma-resv.
> > > > - Likely allocation size is 2M which makes of size of BO (872)
> > > > acceptable per allocation (872 / 2M == .0004158).
> > > >
> > > > With this, using TTM BO for VRAM backing store seems to be an obvious
> > > > choice as it allows leveraging of the TTM eviction code.
> > > >
> > > > Current migration policy is migrate any SVM range greater than or equal
> > > > to 64k once.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/133643/
> > > >
> > > > v2:
> > > > - Rebase on latest GPU SVM
> > > > - Retry page fault on get pages returning mixed allocation
> > > > - Use drm_gpusvm_devmem
> > > > v3:
> > > > - Use new BO flags
> > > > - New range structure (Thomas)
> > > > - Hide migration behind Kconfig
> > > > - Kernel doc (Thomas)
> > > > - Use check_pages_threshold
> > > > v4:
> > > > - Don't evict partial unmaps in garbage collector (Thomas)
> > > > - Use %pe to print errors (Thomas)
> > > > - Use %p to print pointers (Thomas)
> > > > v5:
> > > > - Use range size helper (Thomas)
> > > > - Make BO external (Thomas)
> > > > - Set tile to NULL for BO creation (Thomas)
> > > > - Drop BO mirror flag (Thomas)
> > > > - Hold BO dma-resv lock across migration (Auld, Thomas)
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h | 5 ++
> > > > 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> > > > index 0a78a838508c..2e1e0f31c1a8 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> > > > @@ -32,6 +32,11 @@ static unsigned long xe_svm_range_end(struct xe_svm_range *range)
> > > > return drm_gpusvm_range_end(&range->base);
> > > > }
> > > > +static unsigned long xe_svm_range_size(struct xe_svm_range *range)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return drm_gpusvm_range_size(&range->base);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static void *xe_svm_devm_owner(struct xe_device *xe)
> > > > {
> > > > return xe;
> > > > @@ -512,7 +517,6 @@ static int xe_svm_populate_devmem_pfn(struct drm_gpusvm_devmem *devmem_allocatio
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > > -__maybe_unused
> > > > static const struct drm_gpusvm_devmem_ops gpusvm_devmem_ops = {
> > > > .devmem_release = xe_svm_devmem_release,
> > > > .populate_devmem_pfn = xe_svm_populate_devmem_pfn,
> > > > @@ -592,6 +596,71 @@ static bool xe_svm_range_is_valid(struct xe_svm_range *range,
> > > > return (range->tile_present & ~range->tile_invalidated) & BIT(tile->id);
> > > > }
> > > > +static struct xe_vram_region *tile_to_vr(struct xe_tile *tile)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return &tile->mem.vram;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static struct xe_bo *xe_svm_alloc_vram(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_tile *tile,
> > > > + struct xe_svm_range *range,
> > > > + const struct drm_gpusvm_ctx *ctx)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct mm_struct *mm = vm->svm.gpusvm.mm;
> > > > + struct xe_vram_region *vr = tile_to_vr(tile);
> > > > + struct drm_buddy_block *block;
> > > > + struct list_head *blocks;
> > > > + struct xe_bo *bo;
> > > > + ktime_t end = 0;
> > > > + int err;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!mmget_not_zero(mm))
> > > > + return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> > > > + mmap_read_lock(mm);
> > > > +
> > > > +retry:
> > > > + bo = xe_bo_create_locked(tile_to_xe(tile), NULL, NULL,
> > > > + xe_svm_range_size(range),
> > > > + ttm_bo_type_device,
> > > > + XE_BO_FLAG_VRAM_IF_DGFX(tile));
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(bo)) {
> > > > + err = PTR_ERR(bo);
> > > > + if (xe_vm_validate_should_retry(NULL, err, &end))
> > > > + goto retry;
> > > > + goto unlock;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + drm_gpusvm_devmem_init(&bo->devmem_allocation,
> > > > + vm->xe->drm.dev, mm,
> > > > + &gpusvm_devmem_ops,
> > > > + &tile->mem.vram.dpagemap,
> > > > + xe_svm_range_size(range));
> > > > +
> > > > + blocks = &to_xe_ttm_vram_mgr_resource(bo->ttm.resource)->blocks;
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(block, blocks, link)
> > > > + block->private = vr;
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Take ref because as soon as drm_gpusvm_migrate_to_devmem succeeds the
> > > > + * creation ref can be dropped upon CPU fault or unmap.
> > > > + */
> > > > + xe_bo_get(bo);
> > > > +
> > > > + err = drm_gpusvm_migrate_to_devmem(&vm->svm.gpusvm, &range->base,
> > > > + &bo->devmem_allocation, ctx);
> > > > + xe_bo_unlock(bo);
> > > > + if (err) {
> > > > + xe_bo_put(bo); /* Local ref */
> > > > + xe_bo_put(bo); /* Creation ref */
> > > > + bo = ERR_PTR(err);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > +unlock:
> > > > + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> > > > + mmput(mm);
> > > > +
> > > > + return bo;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > /**
> > > > * xe_svm_handle_pagefault() - SVM handle page fault
> > > > * @vm: The VM.
> > > > @@ -600,7 +669,8 @@ static bool xe_svm_range_is_valid(struct xe_svm_range *range,
> > > > * @fault_addr: The GPU fault address.
> > > > * @atomic: The fault atomic access bit.
> > > > *
> > > > - * Create GPU bindings for a SVM page fault.
> > > > + * Create GPU bindings for a SVM page fault. Optionally migrate to device
> > > > + * memory.
> > > > *
> > > > * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on error.
> > > > */
> > > > @@ -608,11 +678,18 @@ int xe_svm_handle_pagefault(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma *vma,
> > > > struct xe_tile *tile, u64 fault_addr,
> > > > bool atomic)
> > > > {
> > > > - struct drm_gpusvm_ctx ctx = { .read_only = xe_vma_read_only(vma), };
> > > > + struct drm_gpusvm_ctx ctx = {
> > > > + .read_only = xe_vma_read_only(vma),
> > > > + .devmem_possible = IS_DGFX(vm->xe) &&
> > > > + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEVMEM_MIRROR),
> > > > + .check_pages_threshold = IS_DGFX(vm->xe) &&
> > > > + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEVMEM_MIRROR) ? SZ_64K : 0,
> > > > + };
> > > > struct xe_svm_range *range;
> > > > struct drm_gpusvm_range *r;
> > > > struct drm_exec exec;
> > > > struct dma_fence *fence;
> > > > + struct xe_bo *bo = NULL;
> > > > ktime_t end = 0;
> > > > int err;
> > > > @@ -620,6 +697,9 @@ int xe_svm_handle_pagefault(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma *vma,
> > > > xe_assert(vm->xe, xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma));
> > > > retry:
> > > > + xe_bo_put(bo);
> > > > + bo = NULL;
> > > > +
> > > > /* Always process UNMAPs first so view SVM ranges is current */
> > > > err = xe_svm_garbage_collector(vm);
> > > > if (err)
> > > > @@ -635,9 +715,31 @@ int xe_svm_handle_pagefault(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma *vma,
> > > > if (xe_svm_range_is_valid(range, tile))
> > > > return 0;
> > > > + /* XXX: Add migration policy, for now migrate range once */
> > > > + if (!range->migrated && range->base.flags.migrate_devmem &&
> > > > + xe_svm_range_size(range) >= SZ_64K) {
> > > > + range->migrated = true;
> > >
> > >
> > > shouldn't this be set to true, only once xe_svm_alloc_vram is successfull ?
> > > In case of bo alloc failure retry wont enter here.
> > >
> >
> > No. The point of this is try to migrate once to avoid a live lock case
> > of concurrent CPU and GPU access. Once we have migration policy, I'd
> > suspect memory marked as prefered VRAM only try once too. If memory is
> > marked as VRAM only we'd retry to a limit and if reached kill the app.
> > We can work of those details when that code lands. Until then, trying
> > once seems reasonable.
>
> I understand what we are trying to achieve here, and it functions well.
> However, my only concern is member name "migrated" gives the impression that
> it will be set to true only if the range has been successfully migrated to
> VRAM.
>
s/migrated/skip_migrate ?
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > > > +
> > > > + bo = xe_svm_alloc_vram(vm, tile, range, &ctx);
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(bo)) {
> > > > + drm_info(&vm->xe->drm,
> > > > + "VRAM allocation failed, falling back to retrying, asid=%u, errno %pe\n",
> > > > + vm->usm.asid, bo);
>
> This log is also misleading, we dont retry vram allocation in case of first
> failure.
>
How about...
"VRAM allocation failed, falling back to retrying fault,"
Matt
> > > > + bo = NULL;
> > > > + goto retry;
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > err = drm_gpusvm_range_get_pages(&vm->svm.gpusvm, r, &ctx);
> > > > - if (err == -EFAULT || err == -EPERM) /* Corner where CPU mappings have changed */
> > > > + /* Corner where CPU mappings have changed */
> > > > + if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP || err == -EFAULT || err == -EPERM) {
> > > > + if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> > > > + drm_gpusvm_range_evict(&vm->svm.gpusvm, &range->base);
> > > > + drm_info(&vm->xe->drm,
> > > > + "Get pages failed, falling back to retrying, asid=%u, gpusvm=%p, errno %pe\n",
> > > > + vm->usm.asid, &vm->svm.gpusvm, ERR_PTR(err));
> > > > goto retry;
> > > > + }
> > > > if (err)
> > > > goto err_out;
> > > > @@ -668,6 +770,7 @@ int xe_svm_handle_pagefault(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma *vma,
> > > > dma_fence_put(fence);
> > > > err_out:
> > > > + xe_bo_put(bo);
> > > > return err;
> > > > }
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> > > > index 0fa525d34987..984a61651d9e 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> > > > @@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ struct xe_svm_range {
> > > > * range. Protected by GPU SVM notifier lock.
> > > > */
> > > > u8 tile_invalidated;
> > > > + /**
> > > > + * @migrated: Range has been migrated to device memory, protected by
> > > > + * GPU fault handler locking.
>
> The range is not necessarily migrated to device memory if migrated is true.
>
> > > > + */
> > > > + u8 migrated :1;
> > > > };
> > > > int xe_devm_add(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vram_region *vr);
> > >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-19 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-13 2:10 [PATCH v5 00/32] Introduce GPU SVM and Xe SVM implementation Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 01/32] drm/xe: Retry BO allocation Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 02/32] mm/migrate: Add migrate_device_pfns Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 03/32] mm/migrate: Trylock device page in do_swap_page Matthew Brost
2025-02-19 5:36 ` Alistair Popple
2025-02-19 6:08 ` Matthew Brost
2025-02-19 6:25 ` Alistair Popple
2025-02-20 13:28 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2025-02-20 20:03 ` Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 04/32] drm/pagemap: Add DRM pagemap Matthew Brost
2025-02-20 13:53 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 05/32] drm/xe/bo: Introduce xe_bo_put_async Matthew Brost
2025-02-14 9:52 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-20 14:33 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 06/32] drm/gpusvm: Add support for GPU Shared Virtual Memory Matthew Brost
2025-02-19 8:59 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 07/32] drm/xe: Select DRM_GPUSVM Kconfig Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 08/32] drm/xe/uapi: Add DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_MIRROR Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 09/32] drm/xe: Add SVM init / close / fini to faulting VMs Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 10/32] drm/xe: Add dma_addr res cursor Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 11/32] drm/xe: Nuke VM's mapping upon close Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 12/32] drm/xe: Add SVM range invalidation and page fault Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 10:05 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 13/32] drm/gpuvm: Add DRM_GPUVA_OP_DRIVER Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 14/32] drm/xe: Add (re)bind to SVM page fault handler Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 15/32] drm/xe: Add SVM garbage collector Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 10:07 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 16/32] drm/xe: Add unbind to " Matthew Brost
2025-02-19 15:05 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 17/32] drm/xe: Do not allow CPU address mirror VMA unbind if the GPU has bindings Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 11:28 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 18/32] drm/xe: Enable CPU address mirror uAPI Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 11:26 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-13 2:10 ` [PATCH v5 19/32] drm/xe/uapi: Add DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAG_HAS_CPU_ADDR_MIRROR Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 2:11 ` [PATCH v5 20/32] drm/xe: Add migrate layer functions for SVM support Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 2:11 ` [PATCH v5 21/32] drm/xe: Add SVM device memory mirroring Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 11:28 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-13 2:11 ` [PATCH v5 22/32] drm/xe: Add drm_gpusvm_devmem to xe_bo Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 11:29 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-13 2:11 ` [PATCH v5 23/32] drm/xe: Add drm_pagemap ops to SVM Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 2:11 ` [PATCH v5 24/32] drm/xe: Add GPUSVM device memory copy vfunc functions Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 2:11 ` [PATCH v5 25/32] drm/xe: Add Xe SVM populate_devmem_pfn GPU SVM vfunc Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 2:11 ` [PATCH v5 26/32] drm/xe: Add Xe SVM devmem_release " Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 18:29 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-13 2:11 ` [PATCH v5 27/32] drm/xe: Add SVM VRAM migration Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 18:28 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-18 21:54 ` Matthew Brost
2025-02-19 2:59 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-19 3:05 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2025-02-19 3:40 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-19 10:30 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-02-19 17:38 ` Matthew Brost
2025-02-20 15:53 ` Matthew Auld
2025-02-20 15:59 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-02-20 19:55 ` Matthew Brost
2025-02-21 15:15 ` Matthew Auld
2025-02-21 15:22 ` Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 2:11 ` [PATCH v5 28/32] drm/xe: Basic SVM BO eviction Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 2:11 ` [PATCH v5 29/32] drm/xe: Add SVM debug Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 11:30 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-13 2:11 ` [PATCH v5 30/32] drm/xe: Add modparam for SVM notifier size Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 11:31 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-13 2:11 ` [PATCH v5 31/32] drm/xe: Add always_migrate_to_vram modparam Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 11:31 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-13 2:11 ` [PATCH v5 32/32] drm/doc: gpusvm: Add GPU SVM documentation Matthew Brost
2025-02-13 3:35 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Introduce GPU SVM and Xe SVM implementation (rev5) Patchwork
2025-02-13 3:36 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-13 3:37 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-13 21:23 ` [PATCH v5 00/32] Introduce GPU SVM and Xe SVM implementation Demi Marie Obenour
2025-02-14 8:47 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-02-14 9:07 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-14 9:10 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-02-14 16:14 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2025-02-14 16:26 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-02-14 18:36 ` Demi Marie Obenour
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z7VKgVlwmVOz4wKP@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox