From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, uma.shankar@intel.com,
mika.kahola@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/dpll: Change argument for enable hook in intel_global_dpll_funcs
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 16:06:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8r9UHTIiz1sagXs@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250225080927.157437-8-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 01:39:23PM +0530, Suraj Kandpal wrote:
> Change the arguments for enable hook in intel_global_dpll_funcs to only
> accept crtc_state. This is because we really don't need those extra
> arguments everything can be derived from crtc_state and we need
> intel_encoder for PLL enablement when DISPLAY_VER() >= 14.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 100 ++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index bd623fdddfdc..c39f7d73a89f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -66,9 +66,8 @@ struct intel_global_dpll_funcs {
> * Hook for enabling the pll, called from intel_enable_global_dpll() if
> * the pll is not already enabled.
> */
> - void (*enable)(struct intel_display *display,
> - struct intel_global_dpll *pll,
> - const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state);
> + void (*enable)(const struct intel_crtc_state *state,
This feels like the wrong direction. We want the plls to be
independent of crtcs. The crtc_state should only be necessary
to compute a plls's state.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-07 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-25 8:09 [PATCH 00/11] DPLL framework redesign Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll_state Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915/dpll: Rename macro for_each_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915/dpll: Move away from using shared dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:46 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-25 8:54 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-25 9:47 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-25 15:30 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-27 10:18 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-28 14:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-02-28 15:31 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-03-03 12:51 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-03-07 12:02 ` Kahola, Mika
2025-03-07 13:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-03-07 13:53 ` Kahola, Mika
2025-03-11 8:12 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915/dpll: Rename crtc_get_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/dpll: Change argument for enable hook in intel_global_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-03-07 14:06 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2025-03-11 8:15 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-03-11 9:50 ` Kahola, Mika
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915/drm: Rename disable hook in intel_dpll_global_func Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/dpll: Introduce new hook in intel_global_dpll_func Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/dpll: Add intel_encoder argument to get_hw_state hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915/dpll: Change arguments for get_freq hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:43 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for DPLL framework redesign Patchwork
2025-02-25 8:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-25 8:45 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-02-25 9:02 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-25 9:04 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-25 9:06 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-02-25 9:26 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-25 15:21 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z8r9UHTIiz1sagXs@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mika.kahola@intel.com \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
--cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox