Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, uma.shankar@intel.com,
	mika.kahola@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/dpll: Change argument for enable hook in intel_global_dpll_funcs
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 16:06:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8r9UHTIiz1sagXs@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250225080927.157437-8-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 01:39:23PM +0530, Suraj Kandpal wrote:
> Change the arguments for enable hook in intel_global_dpll_funcs to only
> accept crtc_state. This is because we really don't need those extra
> arguments everything can be derived from crtc_state and we need
> intel_encoder for PLL enablement when DISPLAY_VER() >= 14.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 100 ++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index bd623fdddfdc..c39f7d73a89f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -66,9 +66,8 @@ struct intel_global_dpll_funcs {
>  	 * Hook for enabling the pll, called from intel_enable_global_dpll() if
>  	 * the pll is not already enabled.
>  	 */
> -	void (*enable)(struct intel_display *display,
> -		       struct intel_global_dpll *pll,
> -		       const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state);
> +	void (*enable)(const struct intel_crtc_state *state,

This feels like the wrong direction. We want the plls to be
independent of crtcs. The crtc_state should only be necessary
to compute a plls's state.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-07 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-25  8:09 [PATCH 00/11] DPLL framework redesign Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25  8:09 ` [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll_state Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25  8:09 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915/dpll: Rename macro for_each_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25  8:09 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25  8:09 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25  8:09 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915/dpll: Move away from using shared dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25  8:46   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-25  8:54     ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-25  9:47       ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-25 15:30         ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-27 10:18           ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-28 14:26             ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-02-28 15:31               ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-03-03 12:51                 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-03-07 12:02                   ` Kahola, Mika
2025-03-07 13:06                     ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-03-07 13:53                       ` Kahola, Mika
2025-03-11  8:12                         ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-25  8:09 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915/dpll: Rename crtc_get_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25  8:09 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/dpll: Change argument for enable hook in intel_global_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-03-07 14:06   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2025-03-11  8:15     ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-03-11  9:50       ` Kahola, Mika
2025-02-25  8:09 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915/drm: Rename disable hook in intel_dpll_global_func Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25  8:09 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/dpll: Introduce new hook in intel_global_dpll_func Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25  8:09 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/dpll: Add intel_encoder argument to get_hw_state hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25  8:09 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915/dpll: Change arguments for get_freq hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25  8:43 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for DPLL framework redesign Patchwork
2025-02-25  8:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-25  8:45 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-02-25  9:02 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-25  9:04 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-25  9:06 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-02-25  9:26 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-25 15:21 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z8r9UHTIiz1sagXs@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mika.kahola@intel.com \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    --cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox