From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@kernel.org>
To: "Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com, lucas.demarchi@intel.com,
uma.shankar@intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/4] Revert frontbuffer tracking removal
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 15:52:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZGaCDuMYN5Mt47tI@rdvivi-mobl4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230515094614.1850878-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com>
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 12:46:10PM +0300, Jouni Högander wrote:
> Even if frontbuffer tracking is targeted being discontinued it is seen as
> too risky to remove it completely at this point -> Revert frontbuffer
> tracking removal patches. Also add fixup patches to handle build breakage
> caused by these reverts.
>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
for the series, but I'm afraid that you will need to rebase
to get the patch 2 applying again.
>
> Jouni Högander (4):
> Revert "drm/i915/display: Neuter frontbuffer tracking harder"
> Revert "drm/i915: Remove gem and overlay frontbuffer tracking"
> fixup! drm/i915/display: Remaining changes to make xe compile
> fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c | 6 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 +-
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 8 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c | 19 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.c | 6 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c | 7 +-
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++--
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.h | 76 +++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_overlay.c | 14 ++
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c | 3 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_clflush.c | 4 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c | 7 +
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c | 25 ++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 22 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c | 4 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 8 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 12 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_plane_initial.c | 2 +-
> 23 files changed, 321 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-18 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-15 9:46 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/4] Revert frontbuffer tracking removal Jouni Högander
2023-05-15 9:46 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/4] Revert "drm/i915/display: Neuter frontbuffer tracking harder" Jouni Högander
2023-05-15 9:46 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/4] Revert "drm/i915: Remove gem and overlay frontbuffer tracking" Jouni Högander
2023-05-15 9:46 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/4] fixup! drm/i915/display: Remaining changes to make xe compile Jouni Högander
2023-05-15 9:46 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/4] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support Jouni Högander
2023-05-15 9:48 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Revert frontbuffer tracking removal Patchwork
2023-05-15 9:51 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2023-05-15 9:55 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-05-15 10:18 ` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info " Patchwork
2023-05-18 19:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-05-19 7:43 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/4] " Hogander, Jouni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZGaCDuMYN5Mt47tI@rdvivi-mobl4 \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox