Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@kernel.org>
To: "Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com,
	"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	"Uma Shankar" <uma.shankar@intel.com>,
	rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/4] Revert frontbuffer tracking removal
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 10:44:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZGeLT1mI5LUJGctP@rdvivi-mobl4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230519074111.3364590-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com>

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:41:07AM +0300, Jouni Högander wrote:
> Even if frontbuffer tracking is targeted being discontinued it is seen as
> too risky to remove it completely at this point -> Revert frontbuffer
> tracking removal patches. Also add fixup patches to handle build breakage
> caused by these reverts.
> 
> v2: rebase

pushed, thanks!

> 
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> 
> Jouni Högander (4):
>   Revert "drm/i915/display: Neuter frontbuffer tracking harder"
>   Revert "drm/i915: Remove gem and overlay frontbuffer tracking"
>   fixup! drm/i915/display: Remaining changes to make xe compile
>   fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c     |   1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c   |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  |   4 +-
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |   8 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c       |  19 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.c   |   6 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c    |   7 +-
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c  | 128 ++++++++++++++++--
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.h  |  76 +++++++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_overlay.c  |  14 ++
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c    |   3 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c   |   1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_clflush.c   |   4 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c    |   7 +
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    |   2 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c    |  25 ++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h    |  22 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c      |   4 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c            |   1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c               |   8 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c           |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c               |  12 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_plane_initial.c |   2 +-
>  23 files changed, 321 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-19 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-19  7:41 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/4] Revert frontbuffer tracking removal Jouni Högander
2023-05-19  7:41 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/4] Revert "drm/i915/display: Neuter frontbuffer tracking harder" Jouni Högander
2023-05-19  7:41 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/4] Revert "drm/i915: Remove gem and overlay frontbuffer tracking" Jouni Högander
2023-05-19  7:41 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/4] fixup! drm/i915/display: Remaining changes to make xe compile Jouni Högander
2023-05-19  7:41 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/4] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support Jouni Högander
2023-05-19  7:45 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Revert frontbuffer tracking removal (rev2) Patchwork
2023-05-19  7:46 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2023-05-19  7:50 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-05-19  8:18 ` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info " Patchwork
2023-05-19 14:44 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZGeLT1mI5LUJGctP@rdvivi-mobl4 \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox