From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, ville.syrjala@intel.com,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/lnl: support FBC on any plane
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 10:50:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZO2jLiEn9zuQFqsO@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230828062035.6906-4-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 09:20:34AM +0300, Vinod Govindapillai wrote:
> In LNL onwards, FBC can be associated to the first three planes.
> The FBC will be enabled for first FBC capable visible plane
> until the userspace can select one of these FBC capable plane
> explicitly
>
> Bspec: 69560
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c | 5 +++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 +++
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> index 45e205a0f740..62f59630d410 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> @@ -649,6 +649,21 @@ static void skl_fbc_program_cfb_stride(struct intel_fbc *fbc)
> CHICKEN_FBC_STRIDE_MASK, val);
> }
>
> +static u32 lnl_plane_binding(struct intel_fbc *fbc)
> +{
> + switch (fbc->state.plane->id) {
> + default:
> + MISSING_CASE(fbc->state.plane->id);
> + fallthrough;
> + case 0:
> + return DPFC_CTL_PLANE_BINDING_1;
> + case 1:
> + return DPFC_CTL_PLANE_BINDING_2;
> + case 2:
> + return DPFC_CTL_PLANE_BINDING_3;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static u32 ivb_dpfc_ctl(struct intel_fbc *fbc)
> {
> const struct intel_fbc_state *fbc_state = &fbc->state;
> @@ -660,6 +675,9 @@ static u32 ivb_dpfc_ctl(struct intel_fbc *fbc)
> if (IS_IVYBRIDGE(i915))
> dpfc_ctl |= DPFC_CTL_PLANE_IVB(fbc_state->plane->i9xx_plane);
>
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20)
> + dpfc_ctl |= lnl_plane_binding(fbc);
> +
> if (fbc_state->fence_id >= 0)
> dpfc_ctl |= DPFC_CTL_FENCE_EN_IVB;
>
> @@ -1250,6 +1268,17 @@ static int intel_fbc_check_plane(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> }
> }
>
> + /*
> + * From LNL, FBC can be assigned on any plane. Until a provision is
> + * provided for the userspace to select a plane for FBC, lets select
> + * the first visible plane that is FBC capable.
> + */
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20 && fbc->state.plane &&
> + fbc->state.plane != plane) {
> + plane_state->no_fbc_reason = "fbc enabled on another plane";
> + return 0;
> + }
This isn't right. fbc->state.plane is an internal state thing
that chanes willy nilly, so we don't want to check it here.
But we shouldn't need this kind of check anyway. The code
should already work just fine if you just do the tweak to
skl_plane_has_fbc((). Which plane actually gets FBC will be
a bit random, but I think that's fine for the moment.
> +
> plane_state->no_fbc_reason = NULL;
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
> index 4d01c7ae4485..1291351c9941 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
> @@ -1962,7 +1962,10 @@ static bool skl_plane_has_fbc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> if ((DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->fbc_mask & BIT(fbc_id)) == 0)
> return false;
>
> - return plane_id == PLANE_PRIMARY;
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 20)
> + return plane_id <= PLANE_SPRITE1;
> + else
> + return plane_id == PLANE_PRIMARY;
> }
>
> static struct intel_fbc *skl_plane_fbc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index aefad14ab27a..b207774f3c33 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -1327,6 +1327,10 @@
> #define DPFC_CTL_PLANE_IVB(i9xx_plane) REG_FIELD_PREP(DPFC_CTL_PLANE_MASK_IVB, (i9xx_plane))
> #define DPFC_CTL_FENCE_EN_IVB REG_BIT(28) /* ivb+ */
> #define DPFC_CTL_PERSISTENT_MODE REG_BIT(25) /* g4x-snb */
> +#define DPFC_CTL_PLANE_BINDING_MASK REG_GENMASK(12, 11) /* XE */
> +#define DPFC_CTL_PLANE_BINDING_1 REG_FIELD_PREP(DPFC_CTL_PLANE_BINDING_MASK, 0) /* XE */
> +#define DPFC_CTL_PLANE_BINDING_2 REG_FIELD_PREP(DPFC_CTL_PLANE_BINDING_MASK, 1) /* XE */
> +#define DPFC_CTL_PLANE_BINDING_3 REG_FIELD_PREP(DPFC_CTL_PLANE_BINDING_MASK, 2) /* XE */
> #define DPFC_CTL_FALSE_COLOR REG_BIT(10) /* ivb+ */
> #define DPFC_CTL_SR_EN REG_BIT(10) /* g4x only */
> #define DPFC_CTL_SR_EXIT_DIS REG_BIT(9) /* g4x only */
> --
> 2.34.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-29 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-28 6:20 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/4] fbc on any plane Vinod Govindapillai
2023-08-28 6:20 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/lnl: FBC can be enabled with PSR2 Vinod Govindapillai
2023-08-28 23:58 ` Matt Roper
2023-08-29 12:16 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2023-08-28 6:20 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/lnl: update FBC debugfs to include plane information Vinod Govindapillai
2023-08-29 0:01 ` Matt Roper
2023-08-29 7:46 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-08-28 6:20 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/lnl: support FBC on any plane Vinod Govindapillai
2023-08-28 9:00 ` Jani Nikula
2023-08-28 10:10 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2023-08-29 0:16 ` Matt Roper
2023-08-29 13:50 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2023-08-29 16:04 ` Matt Roper
2023-08-30 6:06 ` [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2023-08-29 7:50 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2023-08-29 13:34 ` [Intel-xe] " Govindapillai, Vinod
2023-08-30 5:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-08-28 6:20 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/lnl: FBC is supported with per pixel alpha Vinod Govindapillai
2023-09-01 3:28 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for fbc on any plane (rev2) Patchwork
2023-09-01 3:28 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-09-01 3:29 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-09-01 3:36 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-09-01 3:36 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2023-09-01 3:37 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2023-09-01 4:09 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZO2jLiEn9zuQFqsO@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@intel.com \
--cc=vinod.govindapillai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox