From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Fixup unwind on VM ops errors
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:33:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZOVF3AxP8tEkTY1M@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230817043148.740495-2-matthew.brost@intel.com>
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:31:46PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Remap ops have 3 parts: unmap, prev, and next. The commit step can fail
> on any of these. Add a flag for each to these so the unwind is only done
> the steps that have been committed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 10 +++++++---
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> index 2e99f865d7ec..bd20840616ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -2618,18 +2618,25 @@ static int xe_vma_op_commit(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_op *op)
> switch (op->base.op) {
> case DRM_GPUVA_OP_MAP:
> err |= xe_vm_insert_vma(vm, op->map.vma);
> + if (!err)
> + op->flags |= XE_VMA_OP_COMMITTED;
> break;
> case DRM_GPUVA_OP_REMAP:
> prep_vma_destroy(vm, gpuva_to_vma(op->base.remap.unmap->va),
> true);
> + op->flags |= XE_VMA_OP_COMMITTED;
>
> if (op->remap.prev) {
> err |= xe_vm_insert_vma(vm, op->remap.prev);
> + if (!err)
> + op->flags |= XE_VMA_OP_PREV_COMMITTED;
> if (!err && op->remap.skip_prev)
> op->remap.prev = NULL;
> }
> if (op->remap.next) {
> err |= xe_vm_insert_vma(vm, op->remap.next);
> + if (!err)
> + op->flags |= XE_VMA_OP_NEXT_COMMITTED;
> if (!err && op->remap.skip_next)
> op->remap.next = NULL;
> }
> @@ -2642,15 +2649,15 @@ static int xe_vma_op_commit(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_op *op)
> break;
> case DRM_GPUVA_OP_UNMAP:
> prep_vma_destroy(vm, gpuva_to_vma(op->base.unmap.va), true);
> + op->flags |= XE_VMA_OP_COMMITTED;
> break;
> case DRM_GPUVA_OP_PREFETCH:
> - /* Nothing to do */
> + op->flags |= XE_VMA_OP_COMMITTED;
> break;
> default:
> XE_WARN_ON("NOT POSSIBLE");
> }
>
> - op->flags |= XE_VMA_OP_COMMITTED;
> return err;
> }
>
> @@ -2855,7 +2862,8 @@ static void xe_vma_op_cleanup(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_op *op)
> }
>
> static void xe_vma_op_unwind(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_op *op,
> - bool post_commit)
> + bool post_commit, bool prev_post_commit,
> + bool next_post_commit)
> {
> lockdep_assert_held_write(&vm->lock);
>
> @@ -2882,11 +2890,11 @@ static void xe_vma_op_unwind(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_op *op,
> struct xe_vma *vma = gpuva_to_vma(op->base.remap.unmap->va);
>
> if (op->remap.prev) {
> - prep_vma_destroy(vm, op->remap.prev, post_commit);
> + prep_vma_destroy(vm, op->remap.prev, prev_post_commit);
> xe_vma_destroy_unlocked(op->remap.prev);
> }
> if (op->remap.next) {
> - prep_vma_destroy(vm, op->remap.next, post_commit);
> + prep_vma_destroy(vm, op->remap.next, next_post_commit);
> xe_vma_destroy_unlocked(op->remap.next);
> }
> down_read(&vm->userptr.notifier_lock);
> @@ -3025,7 +3033,9 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_commit(struct xe_vm *vm,
>
> unwind:
> list_for_each_entry_reverse(op, ops_list, link)
> - xe_vma_op_unwind(vm, op, op->flags & XE_VMA_OP_COMMITTED);
> + xe_vma_op_unwind(vm, op, op->flags & XE_VMA_OP_COMMITTED,
> + op->flags & XE_VMA_OP_PREV_COMMITTED,
> + op->flags & XE_VMA_OP_NEXT_COMMITTED);
> list_for_each_entry_safe(op, next, ops_list, link)
> xe_vma_op_cleanup(vm, op);
>
> @@ -3052,7 +3062,7 @@ static void vm_bind_ioctl_ops_unwind(struct xe_vm *vm,
> drm_gpuva_for_each_op(__op, __ops) {
> struct xe_vma_op *op = gpuva_op_to_vma_op(__op);
>
> - xe_vma_op_unwind(vm, op, false);
> + xe_vma_op_unwind(vm, op, false, false, false);
> }
> }
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> index 3681a5ff588b..23b6e10a5080 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> @@ -377,11 +377,15 @@ struct xe_vma_op_prefetch {
> /** enum xe_vma_op_flags - flags for VMA operation */
> enum xe_vma_op_flags {
> /** @XE_VMA_OP_FIRST: first VMA operation for a set of syncs */
> - XE_VMA_OP_FIRST = (0x1 << 0),
> + XE_VMA_OP_FIRST = (0x1 << 0),
> /** @XE_VMA_OP_LAST: last VMA operation for a set of syncs */
> - XE_VMA_OP_LAST = (0x1 << 1),
> + XE_VMA_OP_LAST = (0x1 << 1),
> /** @XE_VMA_OP_COMMITTED: VMA operation committed */
> - XE_VMA_OP_COMMITTED = (0x1 << 2),
> + XE_VMA_OP_COMMITTED = (0x1 << 2),
> + /** @XE_VMA_OP_PREV_COMMITTED: Previous VMA operation committed */
> + XE_VMA_OP_PREV_COMMITTED = (0x1 << 3),
> + /** @XE_VMA_OP_NEXT_COMMITTED: Next VMA operation committed */
> + XE_VMA_OP_NEXT_COMMITTED = (0x1 << 4),
only small comment is that it should be good to change to BIT() macros here.
But up to you:
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> };
>
> /** struct xe_vma_op - VMA operation */
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-22 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-17 4:31 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/3] Fix array of binds Matthew Brost
2023-08-17 4:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Fixup unwind on VM ops errors Matthew Brost
2023-08-22 23:33 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-08-17 4:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/gpuva: Add drm_gpuva_for_each_op_reverse Matthew Brost
2023-08-22 23:34 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-08-17 4:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Fix array of binds Matthew Brost
2023-08-22 23:38 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-08-31 14:43 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-23 12:51 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-08-24 10:38 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-08-24 14:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-17 4:34 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2023-08-17 4:34 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-08-17 4:35 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-08-17 4:39 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-08-17 4:40 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-08-17 4:40 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2023-08-17 5:17 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-08-18 4:08 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/3] " Zanoni, Paulo R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZOVF3AxP8tEkTY1M@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox