Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: "Dugast, Francois" <francois.dugast@intel.com>,
	"Roper, Matthew D" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
	"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 19/20] drm/xe/uapi: Crystal Reference Clock updates
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 16:09:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQtRYyH3XsVEUiH8@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a7476b25f2c183acfe4af5da8381f46cac42169.camel@intel.com>

On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 07:56:16PM +0000, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-09-20 at 15:29 -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > First of all, let's remove the duplication.
> > But also, let's rename it to remove the word 'frequency'
> > out of it. In general, the first thing people think of frequency
> > is the frequency in which the GTs are operating to execute the
> > GPU instructions.
> > 
> > While this frequency here is a crystal reference clock frequency
> > which is the base of everything else, and in this case of this
> > uAPI it is used to calculate a better and precise timestamp.
> > 
> > Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> > Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
> > Cc: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c |  5 ++---
> >  include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h     | 10 ++++------
> >  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c
> > index a27b10583f5a..8184df4abde1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c
> > @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ query_cs_cycles(struct xe_device *xe,
> >  	if (!hwe)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  
> > -	resp.cs_frequency = gt->info.clock_freq;
> > +	resp.cs_reference_clock = gt->info.clock_freq;
> >  
> >  	xe_device_mem_access_get(xe);
> >  	xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> > @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ query_cs_cycles(struct xe_device *xe,
> >  	resp.width = 36;
> >  
> >  	/* Only write to the output fields of user query */
> > -	if (put_user(resp.cs_frequency, &query_ptr->cs_frequency))
> > +	if (put_user(resp.cs_reference_clock, &query_ptr->cs_reference_clock))
> >  		return -EFAULT;
> 
> In my opinion the renames around drm_xe_query_cs_cycles should be done in the patch that implements it.

I honestly agree with it. But I didn't want to disturb the force there
and since we are doing a big modification and that we need to remove the
duplication anyway, I decided to propose it separately.

> 
> >  
> >  	if (put_user(resp.cpu_timestamp, &query_ptr->cpu_timestamp))
> > @@ -380,7 +380,6 @@ static int query_gt_list(struct xe_device *xe, struct drm_xe_device_query *query
> >  		else
> >  			gt_list->gt_list[id].type = XE_QUERY_GT_TYPE_MAIN;
> >  		gt_list->gt_list[id].gt_id = gt->info.id;
> > -		gt_list->gt_list[id].clock_freq = gt->info.clock_freq;
> >  		if (!IS_DGFX(xe))
> >  			gt_list->gt_list[id].native_mem_regions = 0x1;
> >  		else
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> > index 45ec20c2765d..5156bac84f20 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> > @@ -248,8 +248,8 @@ struct drm_xe_query_mem_region {
> >   * relevant GPU timestamp. clockid is used to return the specific CPU
> >   * timestamp.
> >   *
> > - * The query returns the command streamer cycles and the frequency that can
> > - * be used to calculate the command streamer timestamp. In addition the
> > + * The query returns the command streamer cycles and the reference clock that
> > + * can be used to calculate the command streamer timestamp. In addition the
> >   * query returns a set of cpu timestamps that indicate when the command
> >   * streamer cycle count was captured.
> >   */
> > @@ -266,8 +266,8 @@ struct drm_xe_query_cs_cycles {
> >  	 */
> >  	__u64 cs_cycles;
> >  
> > -	/** Frequency of the cs cycles in Hz. */
> > -	__u64 cs_frequency;
> > +	/** Reference Clock of the cs cycles in Hz. */
> > +	__u64 cs_reference_clock;
> >  
> >  	/**
> >  	 * CPU timestamp in ns. The timestamp is captured before reading the
> > @@ -381,8 +381,6 @@ struct drm_xe_query_gt {
> >  	__u16 type;
> >  	/** @gt_id: Unique ID of this GT within the PCI Device */
> >  	__u16 gt_id;
> > -	/** @clock_freq: A clock frequency for timestamp */
> > -	__u32 clock_freq;
> >  	/**
> >  	 * @native_mem_regions: Bit mask of instances from
> >  	 * drm_xe_query_mem_usage that lives on the same GPU/Tile and have
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-20 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-20 19:29 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 00/20] uAPI Alignment - take 1 v2 Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 01/20] drm/xe: Fix array bounds check for queries Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 02/20] drm/xe: Set the correct type for xe_to_user_engine_class Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 03/20] drm/xe: Correlate engine and cpu timestamps with better accuracy Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-26  1:37   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-09-26 18:48     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-26 18:58       ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-09-26 19:07         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-26 19:52           ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-09-26 21:42             ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-27  1:05               ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 04/20] drm/xe/uapi: Separate VM_BIND's operation and flag Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 05/20] drm/xe/vm: Remove VM_BIND_OP macro Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 06/20] drm/xe/uapi: Remove MMIO ioctl Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 07/20] drm/xe: Fix xe_exec_queue_is_idle for parallel exec queues Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 08/20] drm/xe: Deprecate XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_COMPUTE_MODE implementation Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 09/20] drm/xe: Rename exec_queue_kill_compute to xe_vm_remove_compute_exec_queue Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 10/20] drm/xe: Remove XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_COMPUTE_MODE from uAPI Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 11/20] drm/xe/uapi: Use common drm_xe_ext_set_property extension Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 12/20] drm/xe: Kill XE_VM_PROPERTY_BIND_OP_ERROR_CAPTURE_ADDRESS extension Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 13/20] drm/xe/uapi: Document drm_xe_query_gt Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 14/20] drm/xe/uapi: Replace useless 'instance' per unique gt_id Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 15/20] drm/xe/uapi: Remove unused field of drm_xe_query_gt Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 16/20] drm/xe/uapi: Rename gts to gt_list Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 17/20] drm/xe/uapi: Fix naming of XE_QUERY_CONFIG_MAX_EXEC_QUEUE_PRIORITY Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 18/20] drm/xe/uapi: Add documentation for query Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 19/20] drm/xe/uapi: Crystal Reference Clock updates Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:56   ` Souza, Jose
2023-09-20 20:09     ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-09-21 15:50   ` Souza, Jose
2023-09-21 20:49     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-21 21:04       ` Souza, Jose
2023-09-20 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 20/20] drm/xe: Extend drm_xe_vm_bind_op Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-20 19:52 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for uAPI Alignment - take 1 v2 Patchwork
2023-09-20 19:52 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-09-20 19:53 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-09-20 20:00 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-09-20 20:01 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2023-09-20 20:02 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2023-09-20 20:36 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-09-20 21:14 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 00/20] " Matt Roper
2023-09-20 21:54   ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-20 23:07     ` Matt Roper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZQtRYyH3XsVEUiH8@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=francois.dugast@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox