From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe: Add vm snapshot mutex for easily taking a vm snapshot during devcoredump
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 19:21:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZSmYyklINGOJ4RO2@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231013152142.52869-4-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 05:21:41PM +0200, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 7 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> index da006249147e..544d998293d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -1163,7 +1163,9 @@ static int xe_vm_insert_vma(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma *vma)
> xe_assert(vm->xe, xe_vma_vm(vma) == vm);
> lockdep_assert_held(&vm->lock);
>
> + mutex_lock(&vm->snap_mutex);
I can't say I'm a fan of adding a new lock. Can you explain why this is
needed? e.g. Why does the exisiting &vm->lock not work? We have lockdep
annotations in both xe_vm_insert_vma & xe_vm_remove_vma that vm->lock is
held. As is, the capture should be able to take vm->lock in write mode
and this is safe.
Side note the annotations should probably be in write mode for
xe_vm_insert_vma & xe_vm_remove_vma and the capture should be able to
take this in read mode. We should double check on this.
Matt
> err = drm_gpuva_insert(&vm->gpuvm, &vma->gpuva);
> + mutex_unlock(&vm->snap_mutex);
> XE_WARN_ON(err); /* Shouldn't be possible */
>
> return err;
> @@ -1174,7 +1176,9 @@ static void xe_vm_remove_vma(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma *vma)
> xe_assert(vm->xe, xe_vma_vm(vma) == vm);
> lockdep_assert_held(&vm->lock);
>
> + mutex_lock(&vm->snap_mutex);
> drm_gpuva_remove(&vma->gpuva);
> + mutex_unlock(&vm->snap_mutex);
> if (vm->usm.last_fault_vma == vma)
> vm->usm.last_fault_vma = NULL;
> }
> @@ -1343,6 +1347,7 @@ struct xe_vm *xe_vm_create(struct xe_device *xe, u32 flags)
> vm->flags = flags;
>
> init_rwsem(&vm->lock);
> + mutex_init(&vm->snap_mutex);
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vm->rebind_list);
>
> @@ -1486,6 +1491,7 @@ struct xe_vm *xe_vm_create(struct xe_device *xe, u32 flags)
> dma_resv_unlock(&vm->resv);
> drm_gpuvm_destroy(&vm->gpuvm);
> err_put:
> + mutex_destroy(&vm->snap_mutex);
> dma_resv_fini(&vm->resv);
> for_each_tile(tile, xe, id)
> xe_range_fence_tree_fini(&vm->rftree[id]);
> @@ -1625,6 +1631,7 @@ void xe_vm_close_and_put(struct xe_vm *vm)
> up_write(&vm->lock);
>
> drm_gpuvm_destroy(&vm->gpuvm);
> + mutex_destroy(&vm->snap_mutex);
>
> mutex_lock(&xe->usm.lock);
> if (vm->flags & XE_VM_FLAG_FAULT_MODE)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> index 825f8127741e..bf5017b631a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> @@ -183,6 +183,11 @@ struct xe_vm {
> * VM
> */
> struct rw_semaphore lock;
> + /**
> + * @snap_mutex: Mutex used to guard insertions and removals from gpuva,
> + * so we can take a snapshot safely from devcoredump.
> + */
> + struct mutex snap_mutex;
>
> /**
> * @rebind_list: list of VMAs that need rebinding, and if they are
> --
> 2.40.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-13 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-13 15:21 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/4] RFC for discussion of devcoredump uapi maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-13 15:21 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe: Add uapi for dumpable bos maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-13 15:21 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/4] drm/xe: Annotate each dumpable vma as such maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-13 15:21 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe: Add vm snapshot mutex for easily taking a vm snapshot during devcoredump maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-13 19:21 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2023-10-17 10:15 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2023-10-13 15:21 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/4] drm/xe: Almost implement snapshot support maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-13 17:23 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for RFC for discussion of devcoredump uapi Patchwork
2023-10-13 17:23 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-10-13 17:24 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-10-13 17:31 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-10-13 17:32 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-10-13 17:33 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-24 12:22 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/4] drm/xe: Implement snapshot support Maarten, Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-24 12:22 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe: Add vm snapshot mutex for easily taking a vm snapshot during devcoredump Maarten, Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZSmYyklINGOJ4RO2@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox