From: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
To: "Kalvala, Haridhar" <haridhar.kalvala@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/trace: Optimize trace definition
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 14:42:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTDy6ChIDtvWk59N@bvivekan-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89447f6c-7af0-a185-6517-5c9252151db0@intel.com>
On 18.10.2023 13:26, Kalvala, Haridhar wrote:
>
> On 10/16/2023 3:47 PM, Balasubramani Vivekanandan wrote:
> > Make use of EVENT_CLASS to group similar trace events
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h | 83 +++++++++++++++--------------------
> > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h
> > index 456c776f4be1..233b982f34da 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h
> > @@ -517,55 +517,44 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(xe_vm, xe_vm_rebind_worker_exit,
> > TP_ARGS(vm)
> > );
> > -TRACE_EVENT(xe_guc_ct_h2g_flow_control,
> > - TP_PROTO(u32 _head, u32 _tail, u32 size, u32 space, u32 len),
> > - TP_ARGS(_head, _tail, size, space, len),
> > /* GUC */
> > +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xe_guc_ct_flow_control,
> > + TP_PROTO(u32 _head, u32 _tail, u32 size, u32 space, u32 len),
> > + TP_ARGS(_head, _tail, size, space, len),
> > - TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > - __field(u32, _head)
> > - __field(u32, _tail)
> > - __field(u32, size)
> > - __field(u32, space)
> > - __field(u32, len)
> > - ),
> > -
> > - TP_fast_assign(
> > - __entry->_head = _head;
> > - __entry->_tail = _tail;
> > - __entry->size = size;
> > - __entry->space = space;
> > - __entry->len = len;
> > - ),
> > -
> > - TP_printk("head=%u, tail=%u, size=%u, space=%u, len=%u",
> > - __entry->_head, __entry->_tail, __entry->size,
> > - __entry->space, __entry->len)
> > -);
> > -
> > -TRACE_EVENT(xe_guc_ct_g2h_flow_control,
> > - TP_PROTO(u32 _head, u32 _tail, u32 size, u32 space, u32 len),
> > - TP_ARGS(_head, _tail, size, space, len),
> > -
> > - TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > - __field(u32, _head)
> > - __field(u32, _tail)
> > - __field(u32, size)
> > - __field(u32, space)
> > - __field(u32, len)
> > - ),
> > -
> > - TP_fast_assign(
> > - __entry->_head = _head;
> > - __entry->_tail = _tail;
> > - __entry->size = size;
> > - __entry->space = space;
> > - __entry->len = len;
> > - ),
> > -
> > - TP_printk("head=%u, tail=%u, size=%u, space=%u, len=%u",
> > - __entry->_head, __entry->_tail, __entry->size,
> > - __entry->space, __entry->len)
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __field(u32, _head)
> > + __field(u32, _tail)
> > + __field(u32, size)
> > + __field(u32, space)
> > + __field(u32, len)
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + __entry->_head = _head;
> > + __entry->_tail = _tail;
> > + __entry->size = size;
> > + __entry->space = space;
> > + __entry->len = len;
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_printk("h2g flow control: head=%u, tail=%u, size=%u, space=%u, len=%u",
> > + __entry->_head, __entry->_tail, __entry->size,
> > + __entry->space, __entry->len)
> > +);
> > +
> > +DEFINE_EVENT(xe_guc_ct_flow_control, xe_guc_ct_h2g_flow_control,
> > + TP_PROTO(u32 _head, u32 _tail, u32 size, u32 space, u32 len),
> > + TP_ARGS(_head, _tail, size, space, len)
> > +);
> > +
> > +DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT(xe_guc_ct_flow_control, xe_guc_ct_g2h_flow_control,
> > + TP_PROTO(u32 _head, u32 _tail, u32 size, u32 space, u32 len),
> > + TP_ARGS(_head, _tail, size, space, len),
> > +
>
> Hi Bala,
>
> This patch looks good to me. basic query why line space b/w ARGS & printk ?
I simply followed the pattern existing for other trace events.
Regards,
Bala
>
> Reviewed-by: Haridhar Kalvala <haridhar.kalvala@intel.com>
>
> > + TP_printk("g2h flow control: head=%u, tail=%u, size=%u, space=%u, len=%u",
> > + __entry->_head, __entry->_tail, __entry->size,
> > + __entry->space, __entry->len)
> > );
> > DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xe_guc_ctb,
>
> --
> Regards,
> Haridhar Kalvala
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-19 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-16 10:17 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/2] Event tracing for GuC CTB Balasubramani Vivekanandan
2023-10-16 10:15 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2023-10-16 10:15 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-10-16 10:16 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-10-16 10:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Add event tracing for CTB Balasubramani Vivekanandan
2023-10-18 7:49 ` Kalvala, Haridhar
2023-10-19 7:45 ` Balasubramani Vivekanandan
2023-10-25 12:27 ` Kalvala, Haridhar
2023-10-16 10:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/trace: Optimize trace definition Balasubramani Vivekanandan
2023-10-18 7:56 ` Kalvala, Haridhar
2023-10-19 9:12 ` Balasubramani Vivekanandan [this message]
2023-10-16 10:23 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Event tracing for GuC CTB Patchwork
2023-10-16 10:24 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-10-16 10:25 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2023-10-16 10:58 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZTDy6ChIDtvWk59N@bvivekan-mobl \
--to=balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com \
--cc=haridhar.kalvala@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox