Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 1/8] drm/xe: Extend drm_xe_vm_bind_op
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:57:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZVaCQlfHCfblg8ux@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231116144316.7-2-francois.dugast@intel.com>

On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 02:43:09PM +0000, Francois Dugast wrote:
> From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> The bind api is extensible but for a single bind op, there
> is not a mechanism to extend. Add extensions field to
> struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op.
> 
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Cc: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Dominik Grzegorzek <dominik.grzegorzek@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

> ---
>  include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> index d66e8dc72e96..eb53c7a367a1 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> @@ -613,6 +613,9 @@ struct drm_xe_vm_destroy {
>  };
>  
>  struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op {
> +	/** @extensions: Pointer to the first extension struct, if any */
> +	__u64 extensions;
> +
>  	/**
>  	 * @obj: GEM object to operate on, MBZ for MAP_USERPTR, MBZ for UNMAP
>  	 */
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-16 20:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-16 14:43 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 0/8] uAPI Alignment - Cleanup and future proof Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 14:43 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 1/8] drm/xe: Extend drm_xe_vm_bind_op Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 20:57   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-11-16 14:43 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 2/8] drm/xe/uapi: Separate bo_create placement from flags Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 14:43 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 3/8] drm/xe: Make DRM_XE_DEVICE_QUERY_ENGINES future proof Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 14:43 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 4/8] drm/xe/uapi: Reject bo creation of unaligned size Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 14:43 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 5/8] drm/xe/uapi: Align on a common way to return arrays (memory regions) Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 20:39   ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-16 14:43 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 6/8] drm/xe/uapi: Align on a common way to return arrays (gt) Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 20:40   ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-16 20:56     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-11-16 21:28       ` Matt Roper
2023-11-16 14:43 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 7/8] drm/xe/uapi: Align on a common way to return arrays (engines) Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 20:42   ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-16 14:43 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1 8/8] drm/xe/uapi: Add Tile ID information to the GT info query Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 20:44   ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-16 20:52     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-11-16 20:54       ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-17  4:06         ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/uapi: Fix various struct padding for 64b alignment Rodrigo Vivi
2023-11-17 14:25           ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-17 16:24           ` Matt Roper
2023-11-16 14:46 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for uAPI Alignment - Cleanup and future proof Patchwork
2023-11-18  3:14 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success " Patchwork
2023-11-18  3:14 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2023-11-18  3:15 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2023-11-18  3:23 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-11-18  3:23 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2023-11-18  3:24 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2023-11-18  3:59 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-11-20 12:44 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for uAPI Alignment - Cleanup and future proof (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZVaCQlfHCfblg8ux@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=francois.dugast@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox