From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Brian Welty <brian.welty@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/xe: Add exec_queue.sched_props.job_timeout_ms
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:44:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZbgdyOLpCaaVTh9@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240103184408.17844-3-brian.welty@intel.com>
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 10:44:05AM -0800, Brian Welty wrote:
> The purpose here is to allow to optimize exec_queue_set_job_timeout()
> in follow-on patch. Currently it does q->ops->set_job_timeout(...).
> But we'd like to apply exec_queue_user_extensions much earlier and
> q->ops cannot be called before __xe_exec_queue_init().
>
> It will be much more efficient to instead only have to set
> q->sched_props.job_timeout_ms when applying user extensions. That value
> will then be used during q->ops->init().
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Welty <brian.welty@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
> index 94ae87540854..e78b13845417 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ static struct xe_exec_queue *__xe_exec_queue_alloc(struct xe_device *xe,
> q->sched_props.timeslice_us = hwe->eclass->sched_props.timeslice_us;
> q->sched_props.preempt_timeout_us =
> hwe->eclass->sched_props.preempt_timeout_us;
> + q->sched_props.job_timeout_ms =
> + hwe->eclass->sched_props.job_timeout_ms;
>
> if (xe_exec_queue_is_parallel(q)) {
> q->parallel.composite_fence_ctx = dma_fence_context_alloc(1);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> index 3d7e704ec3d9..882eb5373980 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> @@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ struct xe_exec_queue {
> u32 timeslice_us;
> /** @preempt_timeout_us: preemption timeout in micro-seconds */
> u32 preempt_timeout_us;
> + /** @job_timeout_ms: job timeout in milliseconds */
> + u32 job_timeout_ms;
> } sched_props;
>
> /** @compute: compute exec queue state */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> index 21ac68e3246f..56c0a7bf554f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> @@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ static int guc_exec_queue_init(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> init_waitqueue_head(&ge->suspend_wait);
>
> timeout = (q->vm && xe_vm_in_lr_mode(q->vm)) ? MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT :
> - q->hwe->eclass->sched_props.job_timeout_ms;
> + q->sched_props.job_timeout_ms;
> err = xe_sched_init(&ge->sched, &drm_sched_ops, &xe_sched_ops,
> get_submit_wq(guc),
> q->lrc[0].ring.size / MAX_JOB_SIZE_BYTES, 64,
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-03 18:44 [PATCH v2 0/5] Refactor xe_exec_queue_create to fix user extensions Brian Welty
2024-01-03 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/xe: Refactor __xe_exec_queue_create() Brian Welty
2024-01-03 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/xe: Add exec_queue.sched_props.job_timeout_ms Brian Welty
2024-01-04 16:44 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2024-01-03 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/xe: Add exec_queue.sched_props.priority Brian Welty
2024-01-04 16:46 ` Matthew Brost
2024-01-04 19:03 ` Welty, Brian
2024-01-04 19:14 ` Matthew Brost
2024-01-03 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/xe: Finish refactoring of exec_queue_create Brian Welty
2024-01-04 16:54 ` Matthew Brost
2024-01-03 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/xe: Remove set_job_timeout_ms() from exec_queue_ops Brian Welty
2024-01-04 17:07 ` Matthew Brost
2024-01-04 15:42 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Refactor xe_exec_queue_create to fix user extensions (rev2) Patchwork
2024-01-04 15:43 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-01-04 15:44 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-01-04 15:51 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-01-04 15:52 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-01-04 15:53 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-01-04 16:42 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZZbgdyOLpCaaVTh9@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=brian.welty@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox