Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] drm/xe: Runtime PM wake on every IOCTL
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:38:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zc8tEj0DnkTPEhRO@fdugast-desk.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240215193430.130106-3-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 02:34:19PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Let's ensure our PCI device is awaken on every IOCTL entry.
> Let's increase the runtime_pm protection and start moving
> that to the outer bounds.
> 
> v2: minor typo fix and renaming function to make it clear
>     that is intended to be used by ioctl only. (Matt)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c     | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h     |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index 641af3c7fd34..f763385b941b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -141,15 +141,43 @@ static const struct drm_ioctl_desc xe_ioctls[] = {
>  			  DRM_RENDER_ALLOW),
>  };
>  
> +static long xe_drm_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> +	struct drm_file *file_priv = file->private_data;
> +	struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(file_priv->minor->dev);
> +	long ret;
> +
> +	ret = xe_pm_runtime_get_ioctl(xe);
> +	if (ret >= 0)
> +		ret = drm_ioctl(file, cmd, arg);
> +	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static long xe_drm_compat_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> +	struct drm_file *file_priv = file->private_data;
> +	struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(file_priv->minor->dev);
> +	long ret;
> +
> +	ret = xe_pm_runtime_get_ioctl(xe);
> +	if (ret >= 0)
> +		ret = drm_compat_ioctl(file, cmd, arg);
> +	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct file_operations xe_driver_fops = {
>  	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
>  	.open = drm_open,
>  	.release = drm_release_noglobal,
> -	.unlocked_ioctl = drm_ioctl,
> +	.unlocked_ioctl = xe_drm_ioctl,
>  	.mmap = drm_gem_mmap,
>  	.poll = drm_poll,
>  	.read = drm_read,
> -	.compat_ioctl = drm_compat_ioctl,
> +	.compat_ioctl = xe_drm_compat_ioctl,
>  	.llseek = noop_llseek,
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>  	.show_fdinfo = drm_show_fdinfo,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> index d1c105f0eda0..b7a0e3cc594a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> @@ -429,6 +429,21 @@ int xe_pm_runtime_put(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	return pm_runtime_put(xe->drm.dev);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * xe_pm_runtime_get_ioctl - Get a runtime_pm reference before ioctl
> + * @xe: xe device instance
> + *
> + * Returns: Any number greater than or equal to 0 for success, negative error
> + * code otherwise.
> + */
> +int xe_pm_runtime_get_ioctl(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> +	if (WARN_ON(xe_pm_read_callback_task(xe) == current))
> +		return -ELOOP;
> +
> +	return pm_runtime_get_sync(xe->drm.dev);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active - Get a runtime_pm reference if device active
>   * @xe: xe device instance
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h
> index 75919eba1746..7f5884babb29 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ bool xe_pm_runtime_suspended(struct xe_device *xe);
>  int xe_pm_runtime_suspend(struct xe_device *xe);
>  int xe_pm_runtime_resume(struct xe_device *xe);
>  int xe_pm_runtime_get(struct xe_device *xe);
> +int xe_pm_runtime_get_ioctl(struct xe_device *xe);
>  int xe_pm_runtime_put(struct xe_device *xe);
>  int xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active(struct xe_device *xe);
>  void xe_pm_assert_unbounded_bridge(struct xe_device *xe);
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-16  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-15 19:34 [PATCH 01/14] drm/xe: Document Xe PM component Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-15 19:34 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/xe: Convert mem_access assertion towards the runtime_pm state Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-15 19:34 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/xe: Runtime PM wake on every IOCTL Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-16  9:38   ` Francois Dugast [this message]
2024-02-15 19:34 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/xe: Convert kunit tests from mem_access to xe_pm_runtime Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-15 19:34 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/xe: Runtime PM wake on every sysfs call Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-15 19:34 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/xe: Remove mem_access from guc_pc calls Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-15 19:34 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/xe: Runtime PM wake on every debugfs call Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-15 19:34 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/xe: Replace dma_buf mem_access per direct xe_pm_runtime calls Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-15 19:34 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/xe: Convert hwmon from mem_access to " Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-15 19:34 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/xe: Remove useless mem_access protection for query ioctls Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-15 19:34 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/xe: Convert gsc_work from mem_access to xe_pm_runtime Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-15 19:34 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/xe: Remove mem_access from suspend and resume functions Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-15 19:34 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/xe: Convert gt_reset from mem_access to xe_pm_runtime Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-15 19:34 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/xe: Remove useless mem_access on PAT dumps Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-15 20:04 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [01/14] drm/xe: Document Xe PM component Patchwork
2024-02-15 20:05 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-02-15 20:05 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
2024-02-21 12:07 ` [PATCH 01/14] " Francois Dugast
2024-02-21 14:41   ` Gupta, Anshuman
2024-02-21 19:00     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-22 15:06       ` Gupta, Anshuman
2024-02-22 16:29         ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2024-02-21 19:05 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for series starting with [01/14] drm/xe: Document Xe PM component (rev2) Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-22 16:39 [PATCH 01/14] drm/xe: Document Xe PM component Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/xe: Runtime PM wake on every IOCTL Rodrigo Vivi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zc8tEj0DnkTPEhRO@fdugast-desk.home \
    --to=francois.dugast@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox