Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/guc: Handle timing out of signaled jobs gracefully
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 20:20:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zdzyl1D9YR5C0v4e@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07060f9c57583d71193b3e18d029ee8d6abffc6c.camel@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:26:02AM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, 2024-02-23 at 12:46 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > Timing out of signaled jobs can happen during regular operations
> > (e.g.
> > an exec queue closed immediately after last fence signaled). The TDR
> > can
> > pass the worker which free jobs. Rather than running through the TDR
> > if
> > signaled job is found, simply free it without any debug messages.
> > 
> > Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> > Reported-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/1271
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++----------
> > --
> >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > index ff77bc8da1b2..29748e40555f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > @@ -929,20 +929,26 @@ guc_exec_queue_timedout_job(struct
> > drm_sched_job *drm_job)
> >  	int err = -ETIME;
> >  	int i = 0;
> >  
> > -	if (!test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &job->fence-
> > >flags)) {
> > -		drm_notice(&xe->drm, "Timedout job: seqno=%u,
> > guc_id=%d, flags=0x%lx",
> > -			   xe_sched_job_seqno(job), q->guc->id, q-
> > >flags);
> > -		xe_gt_WARN(q->gt, q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_KERNEL,
> > -			   "Kernel-submitted job timed out\n");
> > -		xe_gt_WARN(q->gt, q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_VM &&
> > !exec_queue_killed(q),
> > -			   "VM job timed out on non-killed
> > execqueue\n");
> > -
> > -		simple_error_capture(q);
> > -		xe_devcoredump(job);
> > -	} else {
> > -		drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "Timedout signaled job: seqno=%u,
> > guc_id=%d, flags=0x%lx",
> > -			 xe_sched_job_seqno(job), q->guc->id, q-
> > >flags);
> > +	/*
> > +	 * TDR has fired before free job worker. Common if exec
> > queue
> > +	 * immediately closed after last fence signaled.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &job->fence-
> > >flags)) {
> Perhaps use dma_fence_is_signaled() to double-check?
> 

The reason dma_fence_is_signaled is not used here is because
dma_fence_is_signaled() can signal the hw fence. By design the only
place in the KMD hw fences should be signaled is in
xe_hw_fence.c:hw_fence_irq_run_cb. If I recall correctly, this
simplifies a bunch of things / makes the code less racey. It might be ok
to signal a hw fence here but I'd rather to stick to the current design
of hw fences only signaling in exactly 1 place.

Hope that makes sense.

Matt

> Either way 
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> 
> > +		guc_exec_queue_free_job(drm_job);
> > +
> > +		return DRM_GPU_SCHED_STAT_NOMINAL;
> >  	}
> > +
> > +	drm_notice(&xe->drm, "Timedout job: seqno=%u, guc_id=%d,
> > flags=0x%lx",
> > +		   xe_sched_job_seqno(job), q->guc->id, q->flags);
> > +	xe_gt_WARN(q->gt, q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_KERNEL,
> > +		   "Kernel-submitted job timed out\n");
> > +	xe_gt_WARN(q->gt, q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_VM &&
> > !exec_queue_killed(q),
> > +		   "VM job timed out on non-killed execqueue\n");
> > +
> > +	simple_error_capture(q);
> > +	xe_devcoredump(job);
> > +
> >  	trace_xe_sched_job_timedout(job);
> >  
> >  	/* Kill the run_job entry point */
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-26 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-23 20:46 [PATCH] drm/xe/guc: Handle timing out of signaled jobs gracefully Matthew Brost
2024-02-23 20:55 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-02-23 20:55 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-02-23 20:56 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-02-23 21:07 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-02-23 21:08 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-02-23 21:09 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-02-23 21:29 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-02-26  9:26 ` [PATCH] " Thomas Hellström
2024-02-26 20:20   ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2024-02-26 14:57 ` Souza, Jose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zdzyl1D9YR5C0v4e@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox