From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Remove unused xe_bo->props struct
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 12:33:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ze8yWTmHYScFSpax@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240311151159.10036-1-nirmoy.das@intel.com>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 04:11:59PM +0100, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> Property struct is not being used so remove it and related dead code.
>
> Fixes: ddfa2d6a846a ("drm/xe/uapi: Kill VM_MADVISE IOCTL")
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 59 +++++---------------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_types.h | 19 ----------
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> index b89ac6db68a1..d7e0deb1b869 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> @@ -144,9 +144,6 @@ static void try_add_system(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
> .mem_type = XE_PL_TT,
> };
> *c += 1;
> -
> - if (bo->props.preferred_mem_type == XE_BO_PROPS_INVALID)
> - bo->props.preferred_mem_type = XE_PL_TT;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -181,25 +178,15 @@ static void add_vram(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
> }
> places[*c] = place;
> *c += 1;
> -
> - if (bo->props.preferred_mem_type == XE_BO_PROPS_INVALID)
> - bo->props.preferred_mem_type = mem_type;
> }
>
> static void try_add_vram(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
> u32 bo_flags, u32 *c)
> {
> - if (bo->props.preferred_gt == XE_GT1) {
> - if (bo_flags & XE_BO_CREATE_VRAM1_BIT)
> - add_vram(xe, bo, bo->placements, bo_flags, XE_PL_VRAM1, c);
> - if (bo_flags & XE_BO_CREATE_VRAM0_BIT)
> - add_vram(xe, bo, bo->placements, bo_flags, XE_PL_VRAM0, c);
> - } else {
> - if (bo_flags & XE_BO_CREATE_VRAM0_BIT)
> - add_vram(xe, bo, bo->placements, bo_flags, XE_PL_VRAM0, c);
> - if (bo_flags & XE_BO_CREATE_VRAM1_BIT)
> - add_vram(xe, bo, bo->placements, bo_flags, XE_PL_VRAM1, c);
> - }
> + if (bo_flags & XE_BO_CREATE_VRAM0_BIT)
> + add_vram(xe, bo, bo->placements, bo_flags, XE_PL_VRAM0, c);
> + if (bo_flags & XE_BO_CREATE_VRAM1_BIT)
> + add_vram(xe, bo, bo->placements, bo_flags, XE_PL_VRAM1, c);
> }
>
> static void try_add_stolen(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
> @@ -223,17 +210,8 @@ static int __xe_bo_placement_for_flags(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
> {
> u32 c = 0;
>
> - bo->props.preferred_mem_type = XE_BO_PROPS_INVALID;
> -
> - /* The order of placements should indicate preferred location */
> -
> - if (bo->props.preferred_mem_class == DRM_XE_MEM_REGION_CLASS_SYSMEM) {
> - try_add_system(xe, bo, bo_flags, &c);
> - try_add_vram(xe, bo, bo_flags, &c);
> - } else {
> - try_add_vram(xe, bo, bo_flags, &c);
> - try_add_system(xe, bo, bo_flags, &c);
> - }
> + try_add_vram(xe, bo, bo_flags, &c);
> + try_add_system(xe, bo, bo_flags, &c);
> try_add_stolen(xe, bo, bo_flags, &c);
>
> if (!c)
> @@ -1118,13 +1096,6 @@ static void xe_gem_object_close(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
> }
> }
>
> -static bool should_migrate_to_system(struct xe_bo *bo)
> -{
> - struct xe_device *xe = xe_bo_device(bo);
> -
> - return xe_device_in_fault_mode(xe) && bo->props.cpu_atomic;
> -}
> -
> static vm_fault_t xe_gem_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> {
> struct ttm_buffer_object *tbo = vmf->vma->vm_private_data;
> @@ -1133,7 +1104,7 @@ static vm_fault_t xe_gem_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> struct xe_bo *bo = ttm_to_xe_bo(tbo);
> bool needs_rpm = bo->flags & XE_BO_CREATE_VRAM_MASK;
> vm_fault_t ret;
> - int idx, r = 0;
> + int idx;
>
> if (needs_rpm)
> xe_device_mem_access_get(xe);
> @@ -1145,17 +1116,8 @@ static vm_fault_t xe_gem_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> if (drm_dev_enter(ddev, &idx)) {
> trace_xe_bo_cpu_fault(bo);
>
> - if (should_migrate_to_system(bo)) {
> - r = xe_bo_migrate(bo, XE_PL_TT);
> - if (r == -EBUSY || r == -ERESTARTSYS || r == -EINTR)
> - ret = VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
> - else if (r)
> - ret = VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> - }
> - if (!ret)
> - ret = ttm_bo_vm_fault_reserved(vmf,
> - vmf->vma->vm_page_prot,
> - TTM_BO_VM_NUM_PREFAULT);
> + ret = ttm_bo_vm_fault_reserved(vmf, vmf->vma->vm_page_prot,
> + TTM_BO_VM_NUM_PREFAULT);
> drm_dev_exit(idx);
> } else {
> ret = ttm_bo_vm_dummy_page(vmf, vmf->vma->vm_page_prot);
> @@ -1283,9 +1245,6 @@ struct xe_bo *___xe_bo_create_locked(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
> bo->flags = flags;
> bo->cpu_caching = cpu_caching;
> bo->ttm.base.funcs = &xe_gem_object_funcs;
> - bo->props.preferred_mem_class = XE_BO_PROPS_INVALID;
> - bo->props.preferred_gt = XE_BO_PROPS_INVALID;
> - bo->props.preferred_mem_type = XE_BO_PROPS_INVALID;
> bo->ttm.priority = XE_BO_PRIORITY_NORMAL;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bo->pinned_link);
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_types.h
> index 14ef13b7b421..86422e113d39 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_types.h
> @@ -56,25 +56,6 @@ struct xe_bo {
> */
> struct list_head client_link;
> #endif
> - /** @props: BO user controlled properties */
> - struct {
> - /** @preferred_mem: preferred memory class for this BO */
> - s16 preferred_mem_class;
> - /** @prefered_gt: preferred GT for this BO */
> - s16 preferred_gt;
> - /** @preferred_mem_type: preferred memory type */
> - s32 preferred_mem_type;
> - /**
> - * @cpu_atomic: the CPU expects to do atomics operations to
> - * this BO
> - */
> - bool cpu_atomic;
> - /**
> - * @device_atomic: the device expects to do atomics operations
> - * to this BO
> - */
> - bool device_atomic;
> - } props;
> /** @freed: List node for delayed put. */
> struct llist_node freed;
> /** @created: Whether the bo has passed initial creation */
> --
> 2.42.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-11 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-11 15:11 [PATCH] drm/xe: Remove unused xe_bo->props struct Nirmoy Das
2024-03-11 15:52 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-03-11 15:53 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-03-11 15:54 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-03-11 16:06 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-03-11 16:06 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-03-11 16:07 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-03-11 16:33 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-03-11 16:33 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-03-11 16:43 ` [PATCH] " Lucas De Marchi
2024-03-11 16:49 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-14 4:24 ` Lucas De Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ze8yWTmHYScFSpax@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox