From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] fix "drm/xe: Cleanup some layering in GGTT"
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 09:42:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZecvRt6bLL7xzmS9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240305131250.5330-2-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 02:12:47PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> The null check for GT is after calling gt_to_xe, fix it.
>
> Fixes: 3121fed0c51b ("drm/xe: Cleanup some layering in GGTT")
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
> index 717d0e76277a..0435e1202c46 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
> @@ -251,7 +251,6 @@ int xe_ggtt_init(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt)
>
> static void ggtt_invalidate_gt_tlb(struct xe_gt *gt)
> {
> - struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> int err;
>
> if (!gt)
> @@ -265,7 +264,7 @@ static void ggtt_invalidate_gt_tlb(struct xe_gt *gt)
> xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> err = xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_ggtt(gt);
> if (err)
> - drm_warn(&xe->drm, "xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_ggtt error=%d", err);
> + drm_warn(>_to_xe(gt)->drm, "xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_ggtt error=%d", err);
> xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> }
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-05 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-05 13:12 [PATCH 0/4] drm/xe: Reduce GGTT display pinning latency Maarten Lankhorst
2024-03-05 13:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] fix "drm/xe: Cleanup some layering in GGTT" Maarten Lankhorst
2024-03-05 14:42 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-03-05 15:10 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-03-05 13:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/xe: Do not grab forcewakes when issuing GGTT TLB invalidation via GuC Maarten Lankhorst
2024-03-05 14:43 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-05 18:57 ` Matthew Brost
2024-03-05 19:14 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-05 13:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe: Do not perform GuC TLB invalidation for display GGTT Maarten Lankhorst
2024-03-05 14:46 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-05 17:09 ` Matthew Brost
2024-03-05 13:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/xe: Move xe_ggtt_invalidate out from ggtt->lock Maarten Lankhorst
2024-03-05 17:05 ` Matthew Brost
2024-03-05 13:17 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Reduce GGTT display pinning latency Patchwork
2024-03-05 13:18 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-03-05 13:18 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-03-05 13:29 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-03-05 13:29 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-03-05 13:31 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-03-05 13:56 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZecvRt6bLL7xzmS9@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).