From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
<ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
<joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>, <tursulin@ursulin.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/i915: better high level abstraction for display
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:24:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zh6mKo4SltBU99ba@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1712665176.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:26:42PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> v3 of [1], and no longer an RFC.
>
> This is just initial plumbing, and not much in terms of usage (apart
> from patch 7). We could start converting a number of places already, but
> the main blocker atm is that I haven't figured out a decent solution for
> the various IS_<PLATFORM>() check macros.
what about convert them all to DISPLAY_VER?
or perhaps with a legacy way for that like:
s/IS_<PLATFORM>/IS_DISPLAY_PLATFORM
where
#define IS_DISPLAY_PLATFORM DISPLAY_VER(something...)
btw I just noticed we need to convert DISPLAY_VER towards
display rather then device pointer quickly as well.
>
> I'm intentionally keeping the patches small and independent, because
> they could conceivably be backported to stable as dependencies, so we
> don't cause a huge problem for backports.
>
> Anyway, we could start moving things forward with this.
>
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1709727127.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
>
>
> Jani Nikula (7):
> drm/i915/display: add intel_display -> drm_device backpointer
> drm/i915/display: add generic to_intel_display() macro
> drm/i915: add generic __to_intel_display()
> drm/xe/display: add generic __to_intel_display()
> drm/i915/display: accept either i915 or display for feature tests
> drm/i915/de: allow intel_display and drm_i915_private for de functions
> drm/i915/quirks: convert struct drm_i915_private to struct
> intel_display
>
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c | 40 +++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 6 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h | 102 +++++++++++-------
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h | 3 +
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c | 3 +
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h | 4 +-
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c | 3 +-
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 37 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c | 10 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c | 6 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_quirks.c | 56 +++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_quirks.h | 6 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 11 ++
> .../gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h | 11 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c | 1 +
> 15 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.39.2
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-16 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-09 12:26 [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/i915: better high level abstraction for display Jani Nikula
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] drm/i915/display: add intel_display -> drm_device backpointer Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:05 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/i915/display: add generic to_intel_display() macro Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:06 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/i915: add generic __to_intel_display() Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:08 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/xe/display: " Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:10 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17 9:53 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:04 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/i915/display: accept either i915 or display for feature tests Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:14 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17 13:05 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/i915/de: allow intel_display and drm_i915_private for de functions Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:16 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17 13:05 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-09 12:26 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/i915/quirks: convert struct drm_i915_private to struct intel_display Jani Nikula
2024-04-16 16:17 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-09 12:42 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915: better high level abstraction for display (rev2) Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:42 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:43 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:55 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:58 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-09 12:59 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-09 13:26 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-04-09 15:26 ` ✓ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2024-04-16 16:24 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zh6mKo4SltBU99ba@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).