From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Francois Dugast" <francois.dugast@intel.com>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Convert intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume towards raw wakeref
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:58:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZiGzwL7Rq6OzWCbb@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240418223756.68427-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 06:37:56PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> In the past, the noresume function was used by the GEM code to ensure
> wakelocks were held and bump its usage. This is no longer the case
> and this function was totally unused until it started to be used again
> by display with commit 77e619a82fc3 ("drm/i915/display: convert inner
> wakeref get towards get_if_in_use")
>
> However, on the display code, most of the callers are using the
> raw wakeref, rather then the wakelock version. What caused a
> major regression caught by CI.
>
> Another option to this patch is to go with the original plan and
> use the get_if_in_use variant in the display code, what is enough
> to fulfil our needs. Then, an extra patch to delete the unused
> _noresume variant.
>
> v2: Keep grabbing wakelock but only assert for wakeref. (Imre)
>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Cc: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Fixes: 77e619a82fc3 ("drm/i915/display: convert inner wakeref get towards get_if_in_use")
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10875
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 6 ------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 14 +++++---------
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> index 048943d0a881..03dc7edcc443 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> @@ -640,12 +640,6 @@ release_async_put_domains(struct i915_power_domains *power_domains,
> enum intel_display_power_domain domain;
> intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>
> - /*
> - * The caller must hold already raw wakeref, upgrade that to a proper
> - * wakeref to make the state checker happy about the HW access during
> - * power well disabling.
> - */
> - assert_rpm_raw_wakeref_held(rpm);
> wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(rpm);
>
> for_each_power_domain(domain, mask) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index d4e844128826..2d0647aca964 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -272,15 +272,11 @@ intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_if_active(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
> * intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume - grab a runtime pm reference
> * @rpm: the intel_runtime_pm structure
> *
> - * This function grabs a device-level runtime pm reference (mostly used for GEM
> - * code to ensure the GTT or GT is on).
> + * This function grabs a device-level runtime pm reference.
> *
> - * It will _not_ power up the device but instead only check that it's powered
> - * on. Therefore it is only valid to call this functions from contexts where
> - * the device is known to be powered up and where trying to power it up would
> - * result in hilarity and deadlocks. That pretty much means only the system
> - * suspend/resume code where this is used to grab runtime pm references for
> - * delayed setup down in work items.
> + * It will _not_ resume the device but instead only get an extra wakeref.
> + * Therefore it is only valid to call this functions from contexts where
> + * the device is known to be active and with another wakeref previously hold.
> *
> * Any runtime pm reference obtained by this function must have a symmetric
> * call to intel_runtime_pm_put() to release the reference again.
> @@ -289,7 +285,7 @@ intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_if_active(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
> */
> intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
> {
> - assert_rpm_wakelock_held(rpm);
> + assert_rpm_raw_wakeref_held(rpm);
> pm_runtime_get_noresume(rpm->kdev);
>
> intel_runtime_pm_acquire(rpm, true);
> --
> 2.44.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-18 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-18 22:13 [PATCH] drm/i915: Convert intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume towards raw wakeref Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-18 22:30 ` Imre Deak
2024-04-18 22:34 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-18 22:37 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-18 23:58 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2024-04-19 9:06 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-18 23:57 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915: Convert intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume towards raw wakeref (rev2) Patchwork
2024-04-18 23:58 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-04-18 23:58 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-04-19 0:10 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-19 0:14 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-19 0:15 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-19 1:24 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-04-20 19:07 ` ✓ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZiGzwL7Rq6OzWCbb@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=francois.dugast@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox