From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: "Zeng, Oak" <oak.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] drm/xe: Simplify VM bind IOCTL error handling and cleanup
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:16:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZiLDB87VSgVrBnFA@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SA1PR11MB69913C608E671B3214835367920D2@SA1PR11MB6991.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:19:04PM -0600, Zeng, Oak wrote:
> It is a nice clean up. See one question inline
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brost, Matthew <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 1:41 AM
> > To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: Brost, Matthew <matthew.brost@intel.com>; Zeng, Oak
> > <oak.zeng@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH 06/13] drm/xe: Simplify VM bind IOCTL error handling and
> > cleanup
> >
> > Clean up everything in VM bind IOCTL in 1 path for both errors and
> > non-errors. Also move VM bind IOCTL cleanup from ops (also used by
> > non-IOCTL binds) to the VM bind IOCTL.
> >
> > v2:
> > - Break ops_execute on error (Oak)
> >
> > Cc: Oak Zeng <oak.zeng@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 67 ++++++--------------------------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 5 ---
> > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > index 9d82396cf5d5..8f5b24c8f6cd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > @@ -842,8 +842,7 @@ static int xe_vm_ops_add_rebind(struct xe_vma_ops
> > *vops, struct xe_vma *vma,
> > }
> >
> > static struct dma_fence *ops_execute(struct xe_vm *vm,
> > - struct xe_vma_ops *vops,
> > - bool cleanup);
> > + struct xe_vma_ops *vops);
> > static void xe_vma_ops_init(struct xe_vma_ops *vops);
> >
> > int xe_vm_rebind(struct xe_vm *vm, bool rebind_worker)
> > @@ -876,7 +875,7 @@ int xe_vm_rebind(struct xe_vm *vm, bool
> > rebind_worker)
> > goto free_ops;
> > }
> >
> > - fence = ops_execute(vm, &vops, false);
> > + fence = ops_execute(vm, &vops);
> > if (IS_ERR(fence)) {
> > err = PTR_ERR(fence);
> > } else {
> > @@ -2551,7 +2550,6 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct xe_vm
> > *vm, struct xe_exec_queue *q,
> > if (!last_op)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - last_op->ops = ops;
> > if (last) {
> > last_op->flags |= XE_VMA_OP_LAST;
> > last_op->num_syncs = num_syncs;
> > @@ -2721,25 +2719,6 @@ xe_vma_op_execute(struct xe_vm *vm, struct
> > xe_vma_op *op)
> > return fence;
> > }
> >
> > -static void xe_vma_op_cleanup(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_op *op)
> > -{
> > - bool last = op->flags & XE_VMA_OP_LAST;
> > -
> > - if (last) {
> > - while (op->num_syncs--)
> > - xe_sync_entry_cleanup(&op->syncs[op-
> > >num_syncs]);
>
> I understand all the other part of this function is not needed anymore. But I didn't figure out why sync_entry_cleanup is not needed? You still have syncs, do you? They are allocated in bind_ioctl function and seems you didn't touch it in this patch....Can you explain?
>
It is called in the main IOCTL code (xe_vm_bind_ioctl) now.
See below.
> Oak
>
>
> > - kfree(op->syncs);
> > - if (op->q)
> > - xe_exec_queue_put(op->q);
> > - }
> > - if (!list_empty(&op->link))
> > - list_del(&op->link);
> > - if (op->ops)
> > - drm_gpuva_ops_free(&vm->gpuvm, op->ops);
> > - if (last)
> > - xe_vm_put(vm);
> > -}
> > -
> > static void xe_vma_op_unwind(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_op *op,
> > bool post_commit, bool prev_post_commit,
> > bool next_post_commit)
> > @@ -2816,8 +2795,6 @@ static void vm_bind_ioctl_ops_unwind(struct
> > xe_vm *vm,
> > op->flags &
> > XE_VMA_OP_PREV_COMMITTED,
> > op->flags &
> > XE_VMA_OP_NEXT_COMMITTED);
> > }
> > -
> > - drm_gpuva_ops_free(&vm->gpuvm, __ops);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2904,24 +2881,20 @@ static int
> > vm_bind_ioctl_ops_lock_and_prep(struct drm_exec *exec,
> > }
> >
> > static struct dma_fence *ops_execute(struct xe_vm *vm,
> > - struct xe_vma_ops *vops,
> > - bool cleanup)
> > + struct xe_vma_ops *vops)
> > {
> > struct xe_vma_op *op, *next;
> > struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
> >
> > list_for_each_entry_safe(op, next, &vops->list, link) {
> > - if (!IS_ERR(fence)) {
> > - dma_fence_put(fence);
> > - fence = xe_vma_op_execute(vm, op);
> > - }
> > + dma_fence_put(fence);
> > + fence = xe_vma_op_execute(vm, op);
> > if (IS_ERR(fence)) {
> > drm_warn(&vm->xe->drm, "VM op(%d) failed
> > with %ld",
> > op->base.op, PTR_ERR(fence));
> > fence = ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
> > + break;
> > }
> > - if (cleanup)
> > - xe_vma_op_cleanup(vm, op);
> > }
> >
> > return fence;
> > @@ -2944,7 +2917,7 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_execute(struct xe_vm
> > *vm,
> > if (err)
> > goto unlock;
> >
> > - fence = ops_execute(vm, vops, true);
> > + fence = ops_execute(vm, vops);
> > if (IS_ERR(fence)) {
> > err = PTR_ERR(fence);
> > /* FIXME: Killing VM rather than proper error
> > handling */
> > @@ -3305,30 +3278,14 @@ int xe_vm_bind_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
> > void *data, struct drm_file *file)
> > goto unwind_ops;
> > }
> >
> > - xe_vm_get(vm);
> > - if (q)
> > - xe_exec_queue_get(q);
> > -
> > err = vm_bind_ioctl_ops_execute(vm, &vops);
> >
> > - up_write(&vm->lock);
> > -
> > - if (q)
> > - xe_exec_queue_put(q);
> > - xe_vm_put(vm);
> > -
> > - for (i = 0; bos && i < args->num_binds; ++i)
> > - xe_bo_put(bos[i]);
> > -
> > - kvfree(bos);
> > - kvfree(ops);
> > - if (args->num_binds > 1)
> > - kvfree(bind_ops);
> > -
> > - return err;
> > -
We now fall throuh to the cleanup in both success and error paths...
> > unwind_ops:
> > - vm_bind_ioctl_ops_unwind(vm, ops, args->num_binds);
> > + if (err && err != -ENODATA)
> > + vm_bind_ioctl_ops_unwind(vm, ops, args->num_binds);
> > + for (i = args->num_binds - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> > + if (ops[i])
> > + drm_gpuva_ops_free(&vm->gpuvm, ops[i]);
> > free_syncs:
> > if (err == -ENODATA)
> > err = vm_bind_ioctl_signal_fences(vm, q, syncs, num_syncs);
The next few lines of code call xe_sync_entry_cleanup.
Matt
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> > index 466b6c62d1f9..149ab892967e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> > @@ -330,11 +330,6 @@ enum xe_vma_op_flags {
> > struct xe_vma_op {
> > /** @base: GPUVA base operation */
> > struct drm_gpuva_op base;
> > - /**
> > - * @ops: GPUVA ops, when set call drm_gpuva_ops_free after this
> > - * operations is processed
> > - */
> > - struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops;
> > /** @q: exec queue for this operation */
> > struct xe_exec_queue *q;
> > /**
> > --
> > 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-19 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-10 5:40 [PATCH 00/13] Prep patches for 1 job per VM bind IOCTL Matthew Brost
2024-04-10 5:40 ` [PATCH 01/13] drm/xe: Lock all gpuva ops during " Matthew Brost
2024-04-16 15:51 ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-16 17:02 ` Matthew Brost
2024-04-10 5:40 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/xe: Add ops_execute function which returns a fence Matthew Brost
2024-04-18 16:16 ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-18 19:36 ` Matthew Brost
2024-04-23 3:09 ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-10 5:40 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/xe: Move migrate to prefetch to op_lock_and_prep function Matthew Brost
2024-04-18 19:27 ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-19 19:52 ` Matthew Brost
2024-04-23 3:32 ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-10 5:40 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/xe: Add struct xe_vma_ops abstraction Matthew Brost
2024-04-10 5:40 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/xe: Use xe_vma_ops to implement xe_vm_rebind Matthew Brost
2024-04-19 3:43 ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-19 4:14 ` Matthew Brost
2024-04-23 3:17 ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-10 5:40 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/xe: Simplify VM bind IOCTL error handling and cleanup Matthew Brost
2024-04-19 4:19 ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-19 19:16 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2024-04-23 3:22 ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-10 5:40 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/xe: Use xe_vma_ops to implement page fault rebinds Matthew Brost
2024-04-19 14:22 ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-19 19:33 ` Matthew Brost
2024-04-23 3:27 ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-10 5:40 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/xe: Add some members to xe_vma_ops Matthew Brost
2024-04-19 14:24 ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-10 5:40 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/xe: Add vm_bind_ioctl_ops_fini helper Matthew Brost
2024-04-19 14:51 ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-10 5:40 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/xe: Move ufence check to op_lock Matthew Brost
2024-04-19 14:56 ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-19 19:34 ` Matthew Brost
2024-04-10 5:40 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/xe: Move ufence add to vm_bind_ioctl_ops_fini Matthew Brost
2024-04-19 15:24 ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-19 19:45 ` Matthew Brost
2024-04-23 3:36 ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-10 5:40 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/xe: Add xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_range and convert PT layer to use this Matthew Brost
2024-04-19 16:00 ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-10 5:40 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm/xe: Delete PT update selftest Matthew Brost
2024-04-10 6:28 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for Prep patches for 1 job per VM bind IOCTL Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZiLDB87VSgVrBnFA@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=oak.zeng@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox