From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/guc: Split g2h worker function
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 16:10:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZmHfaRIwhs1L3dXr@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240606130639.1504-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 03:06:38PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> In the next patch we will want to perform the same steps that
> g2h worker function is doing but from the different worker.
>
> Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> index c1f258348f5c..08cf355e2e56 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> @@ -1260,9 +1260,8 @@ static int dequeue_one_g2h(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
> return 1;
> }
>
> -static void g2h_worker_func(struct work_struct *w)
> +static void receive_g2h(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
> {
> - struct xe_guc_ct *ct = container_of(w, struct xe_guc_ct, g2h_worker);
> struct xe_gt *gt = ct_to_gt(ct);
> bool ongoing;
> int ret;
> @@ -1311,6 +1310,13 @@ static void g2h_worker_func(struct work_struct *w)
> xe_pm_runtime_put(ct_to_xe(ct));
> }
>
> +static void g2h_worker_func(struct work_struct *w)
> +{
> + struct xe_guc_ct *ct = container_of(w, struct xe_guc_ct, g2h_worker);
> +
> + receive_g2h(ct);
> +}
> +
> static void guc_ctb_snapshot_capture(struct xe_device *xe, struct guc_ctb *ctb,
> struct guc_ctb_snapshot *snapshot,
> bool atomic)
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-06 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-06 13:06 [PATCH v2 0/2] Allow CTB G2H processing without G2H IRQ Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-06 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/guc: Split g2h worker function Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-06 16:10 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2024-06-06 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe/guc: Allow CTB G2H processing without G2H IRQ Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-06 16:14 ` Matthew Brost
2024-06-06 13:36 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Allow CTB G2H processing without G2H IRQ (rev2) Patchwork
2024-06-06 13:37 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-06-06 13:38 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-06-06 13:49 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-06-06 13:49 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-06-06 13:51 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2024-06-06 20:08 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-06-07 10:19 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-07 20:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Allow CTB G2H processing without G2H IRQ Cavitt, Jonathan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZmHfaRIwhs1L3dXr@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox