From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <imre.deak@intel.com>,
<arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/display: handle HPD polling in display runtime suspend/resume
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 14:27:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zr5IiefJuIR9tpzo@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240815172500.78479-1-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 08:25:00PM +0300, Vinod Govindapillai wrote:
> In XE, display runtime suspend / resume routines are called only
> if d3cold is allowed. This makes the driver unable to detect any
> HPDs once the device goes into runtime suspend state in platforms
> like LNL. Update the display runtime suspend / resume routines
> to include HPD polling regardless of d3cold status.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> index 982b9c5b440f..0cddf55351c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> @@ -294,6 +294,9 @@ void xe_display_pm_suspend(struct xe_device *xe, bool runtime)
> if (!xe->info.probe_display)
> return;
>
> + if (!xe->d3cold.allowed)
> + goto enable_hpd_poll;
> +
> /*
> * We do a lot of poking in a lot of registers, make sure they work
> * properly.
> @@ -308,6 +311,8 @@ void xe_display_pm_suspend(struct xe_device *xe, bool runtime)
> intel_dp_mst_suspend(xe);
>
> intel_hpd_cancel_work(xe);
> + if (runtime)
> + intel_hpd_poll_enable(xe);
If we need to do this, please do not use this function.
Let's first spin out the runtime function to a separate function and then
add the hpd poll only there. But also I don't believe we need anything
of this call in d3hot case anyway. So we need a better refactor with
minimal change.
>
> intel_encoder_suspend_all(&xe->display);
>
> @@ -316,6 +321,12 @@ void xe_display_pm_suspend(struct xe_device *xe, bool runtime)
> intel_fbdev_set_suspend(&xe->drm, FBINFO_STATE_SUSPENDED, true);
>
> intel_dmc_suspend(xe);
> +
> + return;
with return here your code below is not executed.
> +
> +enable_hpd_poll:
> + if (runtime)
> + intel_hpd_poll_enable(xe);
> }
>
> void xe_display_pm_suspend_late(struct xe_device *xe)
> @@ -346,6 +357,9 @@ void xe_display_pm_resume(struct xe_device *xe, bool runtime)
> if (!xe->info.probe_display)
> return;
>
> + if (!xe->d3cold.allowed)
> + goto disable_hpd_poll;
> +
> intel_dmc_resume(xe);
>
> if (has_display(xe))
> @@ -368,6 +382,12 @@ void xe_display_pm_resume(struct xe_device *xe, bool runtime)
> intel_fbdev_set_suspend(&xe->drm, FBINFO_STATE_RUNNING, false);
>
> intel_power_domains_enable(xe);
> +
> + return;
another bogus place:
> +
> +disable_hpd_poll:
> + intel_hpd_init(xe);
> + intel_hpd_poll_disable(xe);
> }
>
> static void display_device_remove(struct drm_device *dev, void *arg)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> index 9f3c14fd9f33..2abfe70d2697 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ int xe_pm_runtime_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
> err = xe_bo_evict_all(xe);
> if (err)
> goto out;
> - xe_display_pm_suspend(xe, true);
> }
> + xe_display_pm_suspend(xe, true);
... please, let's not add extra unecessary calls to the d3hot path.
If hpd_poll is the only missing thing we need to create a function
only for that.
>
> for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
> err = xe_gt_suspend(gt);
> @@ -431,11 +431,12 @@ int xe_pm_runtime_resume(struct xe_device *xe)
> xe_gt_resume(gt);
>
> if (xe->d3cold.allowed) {
> - xe_display_pm_resume(xe, true);
> err = xe_bo_restore_user(xe);
> if (err)
> goto out;
> }
> + xe_display_pm_resume(xe, true);
> +
> out:
> lock_map_release(&xe_pm_runtime_lockdep_map);
> xe_pm_write_callback_task(xe, NULL);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-15 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-15 17:25 [PATCH] drm/xe/display: handle HPD polling in display runtime suspend/resume Vinod Govindapillai
2024-08-15 18:27 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-08-15 20:55 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2024-08-16 8:28 ` Jani Nikula
2024-08-15 19:02 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-08-15 19:03 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-08-15 19:04 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-08-15 19:15 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-08-15 19:18 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-08-15 19:19 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-08-15 19:35 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-08-15 22:32 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zr5IiefJuIR9tpzo@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=vinod.govindapillai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox