From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/pm: Change HPD to polling on runtime suspend
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 19:41:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZrJSHdb7bu90VnJr@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240806085513.3051107-1-arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 02:25:13PM +0530, Arun R Murthy wrote:
> HPD is interrupt based and on runtime suspend change it to polling as
> HPD is not a wakeup event. A worker thread is scheduled for doing this
> polling and it keeps polling for HPD live status on an internval of 10s.
> On runtime resume disable polling and fallback to interrupt mechanism.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> index 9f3c14fd9f33..d952b06ebfb4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include "xe_pcode.h"
> #include "xe_trace.h"
> #include "xe_wa.h"
> +#include "intel_hotplug.h"
>
> /**
> * DOC: Xe Power Management
> @@ -378,6 +379,8 @@ int xe_pm_runtime_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
> if (err)
> goto out;
> }
> + /* Enable hpd polling on runtime suspend */
> + intel_hpd_poll_enable(xe);
>
> xe_irq_suspend(xe);
>
> @@ -427,6 +430,9 @@ int xe_pm_runtime_resume(struct xe_device *xe)
>
> xe_irq_resume(xe);
>
> + /* Disable hpd polling on runtime resume */
> + intel_hpd_poll_disable(xe);
This should be handled in xe_display_pm_resume() (likewise enabling
polling in xe_display_pm_suspend()), in fact it's already called there.
Also this is missing the xe->info.enable_display check and polling
shouldn't be enabled when system (vs. runtime) suspending.
Not sure why the display is suspended/resumed only if d3cold is allowed,
for many of the display s/r steps at least it doesn't make sense to me.
For now moving the d3cold check within
xe_display_pm_suspend()/resume() and enabling/disabling polling
regardless of that flag would be the simplest imo.
> +
> for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
> xe_gt_resume(gt);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-06 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-06 8:55 [PATCH] drm/xe/pm: Change HPD to polling on runtime suspend Arun R Murthy
2024-08-06 9:11 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-08-06 9:11 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-08-06 9:12 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
2024-08-06 16:17 ` [PATCH] " kernel test robot
2024-08-06 16:41 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2024-08-07 9:15 ` Murthy, Arun R
2024-08-07 14:14 ` Imre Deak
2024-08-08 8:40 ` Jani Nikula
2024-08-08 5:56 ` [v2PATCH] drm/xe/display: " Arun R Murthy
2024-08-08 6:58 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for drm/xe/pm: Change HPD to polling on runtime suspend (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZrJSHdb7bu90VnJr@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox