From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] drm/xe: Introduce xe_ggtt_print_holes
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 17:38:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZraMY9cBHYQGL8HE@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09a7eb4c-23fa-481e-ba44-8d3a127e13a1@intel.com>
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:09:01PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>
>
> On 11.07.2024 19:11, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > Introduce a new xe_ggtt_print_holes helper that attends the SRIOV
> > demand and finishes the goal of limiting drm_mm access to xe_ggtt.
> >
> > Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c | 25 +-------------
> > 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
> > index dbaf1ce87fb4..5b51753fe1ba 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
> > @@ -682,3 +682,43 @@ int xe_ggtt_dump(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, struct drm_printer *p)
> > mutex_unlock(&ggtt->lock);
> > return err;
> > }
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * xe_ggtt_print_holes - Print holes
> > + * @ggtt: the &xe_ggtt to be inspected
> > + * @alignment: min alignment
> > + * @p: the &drm_printer
> > + *
> > + * Print GGTT ranges that are available and return total size available.
> > + *
> > + * Return: Total available size.
>
> I would rather prefer to lost that info than make the 'print' function
> return some real value (which may be immediately stale as it will be out
> of mutex)
>
> > + */
> > +u64 xe_ggtt_print_holes(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, u64 alignment, struct drm_printer *p)
> > +{
> > + const struct drm_mm *mm = &ggtt->mm;
> > + const struct drm_mm_node *entry;
> > + u64 hole_min_start = xe_wopcm_size(tile_to_xe(ggtt->tile));
> > + u64 hole_start, hole_end, hole_size;
> > + u64 total;
> > + char buf[10];
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&ggtt->lock);
> > +
> > + drm_mm_for_each_hole(entry, mm, hole_start, hole_end) {
> > + hole_start = max(hole_start, hole_min_start);
> > + hole_start = ALIGN(hole_start, alignment);
> > + hole_end = ALIGN_DOWN(hole_end, alignment);
> > + if (hole_start >= hole_end)
> > + continue;
> > + hole_size = hole_end - hole_start;
> > + total += hole_size;
> > +
> > + string_get_size(hole_size, 1, STRING_UNITS_2, buf, sizeof(buf));
> > + drm_printf(p, "range:\t%#llx-%#llx\t(%s)\n",
> > + hole_start, hole_end - 1, buf);
> > + }
>
> or we can print that 'total' here, as it is still kind of related since
> it is "sum of all holes" ;)
it is actually used in one of the cases after this print...
string_get_size(total, 1, STRING_UNITS_2, buf, sizeof(buf));
perhaps print is a bad name then... but I'm out of ideas...
>
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&ggtt->lock);
> > +
> > + return total;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h
> > index 31060fe7644b..67ae5f1602a3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ void xe_ggtt_remove_bo(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, struct xe_bo *bo);
> > u64 xe_ggtt_largest_hole(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, u64 alignment, u64 *spare);
> >
> > int xe_ggtt_dump(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, struct drm_printer *p);
>
> hmm, maybe xe_ggtt_dump() from prev patch should be xe_ggtt_print() ?
hmm... likely, but this needs to calculate the whole...
but we could perhaps
s/xe_ggtt_print/xe_ggtt_get_holes_total
s/xe_ggtt_dump/xe_ggtt_print
?
>
> > +u64 xe_ggtt_print_holes(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, u64 alignment, struct drm_printer *p);
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
> > void xe_ggtt_assign(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, const struct xe_ggtt_node *node, u16 vfid);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c
> > index 1d17c34fe5a4..d0995680f53f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c
> > @@ -6,9 +6,6 @@
> > #include <linux/string_choices.h>
> > #include <linux/wordpart.h>
> >
> > -/* FIXME: remove this after encapsulating all drm_mm_node access into xe_ggtt */
> > -#include <drm/drm_mm.h>
> > -
> > #include "abi/guc_actions_sriov_abi.h"
> > #include "abi/guc_klvs_abi.h"
> >
> > @@ -2096,11 +2093,7 @@ int xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_print_dbs(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
> > int xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_print_available_ggtt(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
> > {
> > struct xe_ggtt *ggtt = gt_to_tile(gt)->mem.ggtt;
> > - const struct drm_mm *mm = &ggtt->mm;
> > - const struct drm_mm_node *entry;
> > u64 alignment = pf_get_ggtt_alignment(gt);
> > - u64 hole_min_start = xe_wopcm_size(gt_to_xe(gt));
> > - u64 hole_start, hole_end, hole_size;
> > u64 spare, avail, total = 0;
> > char buf[10];
> >
> > @@ -2109,24 +2102,8 @@ int xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_print_available_ggtt(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_prin
> > mutex_lock(xe_gt_sriov_pf_master_mutex(gt));
> >
> > spare = pf_get_spare_ggtt(gt);
> > + total = xe_ggtt_print_holes(ggtt, alignment, p);
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&ggtt->lock);
> > -
> > - drm_mm_for_each_hole(entry, mm, hole_start, hole_end) {
> > - hole_start = max(hole_start, hole_min_start);
> > - hole_start = ALIGN(hole_start, alignment);
> > - hole_end = ALIGN_DOWN(hole_end, alignment);
> > - if (hole_start >= hole_end)
> > - continue;
> > - hole_size = hole_end - hole_start;
> > - total += hole_size;
> > -
> > - string_get_size(hole_size, 1, STRING_UNITS_2, buf, sizeof(buf));
> > - drm_printf(p, "range:\t%#llx-%#llx\t(%s)\n",
> > - hole_start, hole_end - 1, buf);
> > - }
> > -
> > - mutex_unlock(&ggtt->lock);
> > mutex_unlock(xe_gt_sriov_pf_master_mutex(gt));
> >
> > string_get_size(total, 1, STRING_UNITS_2, buf, sizeof(buf));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-09 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-11 17:11 [PATCH 01/12] drm/xe: Removed unused xe_ggtt_printk Rodrigo Vivi
2024-07-11 17:11 ` [PATCH 02/12] drm/xe: Introduce GGTT documentation Rodrigo Vivi
2024-07-11 19:41 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-07-11 17:11 ` [PATCH 03/12] drm/xe: Remove unnecessary drm_mm.h includes Rodrigo Vivi
2024-07-11 18:35 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2024-07-11 17:11 ` [PATCH 04/12] drm/{i915, xe}: Avoid direct inspection of dpt_vma from outside dpt Rodrigo Vivi
2024-07-11 18:38 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2024-07-11 17:11 ` [PATCH 05/12] drm/xe: Encapsulate drm_mm_node inside xe_ggtt_node Rodrigo Vivi
2024-07-11 19:51 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-07-16 17:16 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-11 17:11 ` [PATCH 06/12] drm/xe: Rename xe_ggtt_node related functions Rodrigo Vivi
2024-07-16 17:24 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-11 17:11 ` [PATCH 07/12] drm/xe: Limit drm_mm_node_allocated access to xe_ggtt_node Rodrigo Vivi
2024-07-17 23:27 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-11 17:11 ` [PATCH 08/12] drm/xe: Introduce xe_ggtt_largest_hole Rodrigo Vivi
2024-07-11 20:00 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-09 21:33 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-07-11 17:11 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/xe: Introduce xe_ggtt_print_holes Rodrigo Vivi
2024-07-11 18:43 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2024-07-11 20:09 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-09 21:38 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-07-11 17:11 ` [PATCH 10/12] drm/xe: Rename xe_ggtt balloon functions to make the node clear Rodrigo Vivi
2024-07-11 20:17 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-09 21:42 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-07-11 17:11 ` [PATCH 11/12] drm/xe: Make xe_ggtt_node struct independent Rodrigo Vivi
2024-07-17 23:50 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-11 17:11 ` [PATCH 12/12] drm/xe: Fix missing runtime outer protection for ggtt_remove_node Rodrigo Vivi
2024-07-16 17:32 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-11 17:25 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [01/12] drm/xe: Removed unused xe_ggtt_printk Patchwork
2024-07-11 17:26 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-07-11 17:28 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-07-11 17:34 ` ✗ CI.Build: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-08-15 22:07 [PATCH 01/12] " Rodrigo Vivi
2024-08-15 22:07 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/xe: Introduce xe_ggtt_print_holes Rodrigo Vivi
2024-08-16 15:02 [PATCH 01/12] drm/xe: Removed unused xe_ggtt_printk Rodrigo Vivi
2024-08-16 15:02 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/xe: Introduce xe_ggtt_print_holes Rodrigo Vivi
2024-08-17 10:35 [PATCH 01/12] drm/xe: Removed unused xe_ggtt_printk Rodrigo Vivi
2024-08-17 10:35 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/xe: Introduce xe_ggtt_print_holes Rodrigo Vivi
2024-08-20 20:25 [PATCH 01/12] drm/xe: Removed unused xe_ggtt_printk Rodrigo Vivi
2024-08-20 20:25 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/xe: Introduce xe_ggtt_print_holes Rodrigo Vivi
2024-08-21 19:38 [PATCH 01/12] drm/xe: Removed unused xe_ggtt_printk Rodrigo Vivi
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/xe: Introduce xe_ggtt_print_holes Rodrigo Vivi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZraMY9cBHYQGL8HE@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox