From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/icl_dsi: Move helpers to configure dsi dual link to intel_dss
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 14:25:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZtGsD-504h1UmRDu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240830050950.2528450-8-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 10:39:37AM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Move the function to configure dss_ctl for dual_link dsi to intel_dss
> files. While at it, use struct intel_display wherever possible.
>
> v2: Avoid modifying the code while movement. (Jani)
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c | 57 ++----------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.h | 3 ++
> 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c
> index 79e149d51cb2..ec880d1cbbee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
> #include "intel_de.h"
> #include "intel_dsi.h"
> #include "intel_dsi_vbt.h"
> -#include "intel_dss_regs.h"
> +#include "intel_dss.h"
> #include "intel_panel.h"
> #include "intel_vdsc.h"
> #include "skl_scaler.h"
> @@ -274,55 +274,6 @@ static void dsi_program_swing_and_deemphasis(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> }
> }
>
> -static void configure_dual_link_mode(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> - const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> - u8 dual_link, u8 pixel_overlap)
> -{
> - struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(encoder);
> - i915_reg_t dss_ctl1_reg, dss_ctl2_reg;
> - u32 dss_ctl1;
> -
> - /* FIXME: Move all DSS handling to intel_vdsc.c */
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 12) {
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(pipe_config->uapi.crtc);
> -
> - dss_ctl1_reg = ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1(crtc->pipe);
> - dss_ctl2_reg = ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL2(crtc->pipe);
> - } else {
> - dss_ctl1_reg = DSS_CTL1;
> - dss_ctl2_reg = DSS_CTL2;
> - }
> -
> - dss_ctl1 = intel_de_read(display, dss_ctl1_reg);
> - dss_ctl1 |= SPLITTER_ENABLE;
> - dss_ctl1 &= ~OVERLAP_PIXELS_MASK;
> - dss_ctl1 |= OVERLAP_PIXELS(pixel_overlap);
> -
> - if (dual_link == DSI_DUAL_LINK_FRONT_BACK) {
> - const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
> - &pipe_config->hw.adjusted_mode;
> - u16 hactive = adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay;
> - u16 dl_buffer_depth;
> -
> - dss_ctl1 &= ~DUAL_LINK_MODE_INTERLEAVE;
> - dl_buffer_depth = hactive / 2 + pixel_overlap;
> -
> - if (dl_buffer_depth > MAX_DL_BUFFER_TARGET_DEPTH)
> - drm_err(display->drm,
> - "DL buffer depth exceed max value\n");
> -
> - dss_ctl1 &= ~LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK;
> - dss_ctl1 |= LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(dl_buffer_depth);
> - intel_de_rmw(display, dss_ctl2_reg, RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK,
> - RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(dl_buffer_depth));
> - } else {
> - /* Interleave */
> - dss_ctl1 |= DUAL_LINK_MODE_INTERLEAVE;
> - }
> -
> - intel_de_write(display, dss_ctl1_reg, dss_ctl1);
> -}
> -
> /* aka DSI 8X clock */
> static int afe_clk(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> @@ -791,9 +742,9 @@ gen11_dsi_configure_transcoder(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> }
>
> /* configure stream splitting */
> - configure_dual_link_mode(encoder, pipe_config,
> - intel_dsi->dual_link,
> - intel_dsi->pixel_overlap);
> + intel_dss_dsi_dual_link_mode_configure(encoder, pipe_config,
> + intel_dsi->dual_link,
> + intel_dsi->pixel_overlap);
> }
>
> for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.c
> index 3f7f416eb3fa..969e32143983 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #include "i915_reg_defs.h"
> #include "intel_de.h"
> #include "intel_display_types.h"
> +#include "intel_dsi.h"
> #include "intel_dss.h"
> #include "intel_dss_regs.h"
>
> @@ -87,3 +88,52 @@ void intel_dss_mso_configure(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> SPLITTER_ENABLE | SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_MASK |
> OVERLAP_PIXELS_MASK, dss1);
> }
> +
> +void intel_dss_dsi_dual_link_mode_configure(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> + u8 dual_link,
> + u8 pixel_overlap)
> +{
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(encoder);
> + i915_reg_t dss_ctl1_reg, dss_ctl2_reg;
> + u32 dss_ctl1;
> +
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 12) {
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(pipe_config->uapi.crtc);
> +
> + dss_ctl1_reg = ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1(crtc->pipe);
> + dss_ctl2_reg = ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL2(crtc->pipe);
> + } else {
> + dss_ctl1_reg = DSS_CTL1;
> + dss_ctl2_reg = DSS_CTL2;
> + }
> +
> + dss_ctl1 = intel_de_read(display, dss_ctl1_reg);
> + dss_ctl1 |= SPLITTER_ENABLE;
> + dss_ctl1 &= ~OVERLAP_PIXELS_MASK;
> + dss_ctl1 |= OVERLAP_PIXELS(pixel_overlap);
> +
> + if (dual_link == DSI_DUAL_LINK_FRONT_BACK) {
> + const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
> + &pipe_config->hw.adjusted_mode;
> + u16 hactive = adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay;
> + u16 dl_buffer_depth;
> +
> + dss_ctl1 &= ~DUAL_LINK_MODE_INTERLEAVE;
> + dl_buffer_depth = hactive / 2 + pixel_overlap;
> +
> + if (dl_buffer_depth > MAX_DL_BUFFER_TARGET_DEPTH)
> + drm_err(display->drm,
> + "DL buffer depth exceed max value\n");
> +
> + dss_ctl1 &= ~LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK;
> + dss_ctl1 |= LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(dl_buffer_depth);
> + intel_de_rmw(display, dss_ctl2_reg, RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK,
> + RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(dl_buffer_depth));
Leaking the DSI mess outside of the DSI code is not great. The DSI
code should really just be taught to use the crtc_state properly.
> + } else {
> + /* Interleave */
> + dss_ctl1 |= DUAL_LINK_MODE_INTERLEAVE;
> + }
> +
> + intel_de_write(display, dss_ctl1_reg, dss_ctl1);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.h
> index d4629052979a..aa8c67c15855 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.h
> @@ -16,5 +16,8 @@ u8 intel_dss_mso_pipe_mask(struct intel_display *display);
> void intel_dss_mso_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
> void intel_dss_mso_configure(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> +void intel_dss_dsi_dual_link_mode_configure(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> + u8 dual_link, u8 pixel_overlap);
>
> #endif /* __INTEL_DSS_H__ */
> --
> 2.45.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-30 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-30 5:09 [PATCH 00/19] Consolidation of DSS Control in Separate Files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915/display: Move all DSS control registers to a new file Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915/dss_regs: Use REG_* macros for the DSS ctl bits Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 11:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-02 4:36 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 03/19] drm/i915/ddi: Move all mso related helpers to a new file Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 04/19] drm/i915/dss: Move to struct intel_display Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 05/19] drm/i915/icl_dsi: Avoid using intel_dsi in configure_dual_link_mode Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915/icl_dsi: Use intel_display " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/icl_dsi: Move helpers to configure dsi dual link to intel_dss Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 11:25 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2024-09-02 4:51 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915/vdsc: Rename helper to check if the pipe supports dsc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 09/19] drm/i915/vdsc: Move all dss stuff in dss files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 10/19] drm/i915/dss: Use struct intel_display in dss dsc helpers Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 11/19] drm/i915/display: Move dss stuff in intel_dss files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 12/19] drm/i915/display: Rename static functions that use joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 13/19] drm/i915/display: Separate out joiner stuff in a new file Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915/display: Move intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask to intel_joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 15/19] drm/i915/display: Move helpers for primary joiner " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915/display: Move intel_crtc_is_joiner_secondary " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915/display: Move intel_crtc_joiner_secondary_pipes " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 18/19] drm/i915/joiner: Use struct intel_display in intel_joiner_enabled_pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 5:09 ` [PATCH 19/19] drm/i915/joiner: Use struct intel_display in intel_joiner_supported_pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30 6:10 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Consolidation of DSS Control in Separate Files (rev3) Patchwork
2024-08-30 6:11 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-08-30 6:12 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-08-30 6:24 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-08-30 6:53 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-08-30 18:28 ` ✓ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-08-29 13:18 [PATCH 00/19] Consolidation of DSS Control in Separate Files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/icl_dsi: Move helpers to configure dsi dual link to intel_dss Ankit Nautiyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZtGsD-504h1UmRDu@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox