Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: "Cavitt, Jonathan" <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>,
	"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Add missing HPD interrupt enabling during non-d3cold RPM resume
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:21:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZwWUSvWdKZGxs5Yo@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZwVQwTN-FklTi6cb@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com>

On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 06:33:21PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 02:52:22PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 09:46:53PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 09:29:46PM +0300, Cavitt, Jonathan wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Intel-xe <intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Imre Deak
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 7, 2024 7:06 AM
> > > > To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Add missing HPD interrupt enabling during non-d3cold RPM resume
> > > > >
> > > > > Atm the display HPD interrupts that got disabled during runtime
> > > > > suspend, are re-enabled only if d3cold is enabled. Fix things by
> > > > > also re-enabling the interrupts if d3cold is disabled.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Is there a reason this ended up as a separate patch?
> > > 
> > > On the principle of doing one thing in one patch: the first is
> > > refactoring, this one is a fix.
> > 
> > We do need this, but we need a lot more.
> 
> I think this should be applied before other changes and from your
> patchset similar fixes (ideally xe-only changes) should be applied first
> before other refactoring changes (I think there are other such changes
> there). These fixes could be backported then if needed.

Agreed. Let's merge this then and I will address your comments there and
get the xe ones before.

> 
> > Please help on the review of the consolidation and the true split:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/intel-xe/20240924204222.246862-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com/T/#m482df5716f81e6f6a3b5f459f57f193a4292ab52
> > 
> > > 
> > > > Not blocking, just curious.
> > > > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
> > > > -Jonathan Cavitt
> > > > 
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 1 +
> > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> > > > > index cb2449b7921ac..695c27ac6b0f8 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> > > > > @@ -486,6 +486,7 @@ void xe_display_pm_runtime_resume(struct xe_device *xe)
> > > > >               return;
> > > > >       }
> > > > >
> > > > > +     intel_hpd_init(xe);
> > > > >       intel_hpd_poll_disable(xe);
> > > > >  }
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.44.2
> > > > >
> > > > >

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-08 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-07 14:05 [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Separate the d3cold and non-d3cold runtime PM handling Imre Deak
2024-10-07 14:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Add missing HPD interrupt enabling during non-d3cold RPM resume Imre Deak
2024-10-07 18:29   ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2024-10-07 18:46     ` Imre Deak
2024-10-07 18:52       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-10-08 15:33         ` Imre Deak
2024-10-08 20:21           ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-10-07 18:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Separate the d3cold and non-d3cold runtime PM handling Cavitt, Jonathan
2024-10-07 18:45   ` Imre Deak
2024-10-07 19:24 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
2024-10-07 19:24 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-07 19:25 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-07 19:37 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-07 19:39 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-07 19:41 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-07 20:13 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-10-08  8:27 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZwWUSvWdKZGxs5Yo@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox