From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
<rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, Alex Zuo <alex.zuo@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Log unreliable MMIO reads during forcewake
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:09:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZwoEbQAQolLNLbeq@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241012033445.1090373-1-shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 03:34:45AM +0000, Shuicheng Lin wrote:
> In some cases, when the driver attempts to read an MMIO register,
> the hardware may return 0xFFFFFFFF. The current force wake path
> code treats this as a valid response, as it only checks the BIT.
> However, 0xFFFFFFFF should be considered an invalid value, indicating
> a potential issue. To address this, we should add a log entry to
> highlight this condition.
>
> Suggested-by: Alex Zuo <alex.zuo@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> index a64c14757c84..46f36d05293a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,10 @@ static int __domain_wait(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain,
> ret = xe_mmio_wait32(>->mmio, domain->reg_ack, domain->val, wake ? domain->val : 0,
> XE_FORCE_WAKE_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS * USEC_PER_MSEC,
> &value, true);
> + if (value == ~0)
> + xe_gt_notice(gt,
> + "Force wake domain %d: %s. MMIO unreliable (forcewake register returns 0xFFFFFFFF)!\n",
> + domain->id, str_wake_sleep(wake));
Set the ret value (-EIO) to kick the error to upper layers?
> if (ret)
Then...
if (ret)
...
else if (value == ~0)
...
ret = -EIO;
Matt
> xe_gt_notice(gt, "Force wake domain %d failed to ack %s (%pe) reg[%#x] = %#x\n",
> domain->id, str_wake_sleep(wake), ERR_PTR(ret),
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-12 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-12 3:34 [PATCH] drm/xe: Log unreliable MMIO reads during forcewake Shuicheng Lin
2024-10-12 4:22 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-10-12 4:22 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-12 4:23 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-12 4:35 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-12 4:37 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-12 4:39 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-12 4:58 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-10-12 5:09 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2024-10-13 12:46 ` [PATCH] " Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-14 21:09 ` Lin, Shuicheng
2024-10-14 21:08 ` Lin, Shuicheng
2024-10-12 10:20 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZwoEbQAQolLNLbeq@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=alex.zuo@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=shuicheng.lin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox