Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/guc: Prefer GT oriented logs in submit code
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 14:19:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zy081U4kGgRNgfwk@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241107194741.2167-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>

On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 08:47:41PM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> For better diagnostics, use xe_gt_err() instead of drm_err().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> index 0311d9e50d06..c70b75a3eb85 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> @@ -763,7 +763,6 @@ static void disable_scheduling_deregister(struct xe_guc *guc,
>  					  struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>  {
>  	MAKE_SCHED_CONTEXT_ACTION(q, DISABLE);
> -	struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	set_min_preemption_timeout(guc, q);
> @@ -773,7 +772,7 @@ static void disable_scheduling_deregister(struct xe_guc *guc,
>  	if (!ret) {
>  		struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched = &q->guc->sched;
>  
> -		drm_warn(&xe->drm, "Pending enable failed to respond");
> +		xe_gt_warn(q->gt, "Pending enable failed to respond\n");
>  		xe_sched_submission_start(sched);
>  		xe_gt_reset_async(q->gt);
>  		xe_sched_tdr_queue_imm(sched);
> @@ -817,7 +816,7 @@ static void xe_guc_exec_queue_trigger_cleanup(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>   */
>  void xe_guc_submit_wedge(struct xe_guc *guc)
>  {
> -	struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> +	struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
>  	struct xe_exec_queue *q;
>  	unsigned long index;
>  	int err;
> @@ -827,7 +826,8 @@ void xe_guc_submit_wedge(struct xe_guc *guc)
>  	err = devm_add_action_or_reset(guc_to_xe(guc)->drm.dev,
>  				       guc_submit_wedged_fini, guc);
>  	if (err) {
> -		drm_err(&xe->drm, "Failed to register xe_guc_submit clean-up on wedged.mode=2. Although device is wedged.\n");
> +		xe_gt_err(gt, "Failed to register clean-up on wedged.mode=2; "
> +			  "Although device is wedged.\n");
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -859,7 +859,6 @@ static void xe_guc_exec_queue_lr_cleanup(struct work_struct *w)
>  		container_of(w, struct xe_guc_exec_queue, lr_tdr);
>  	struct xe_exec_queue *q = ge->q;
>  	struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
> -	struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
>  	struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched = &ge->sched;
>  	bool wedged;
>  
> @@ -897,7 +896,7 @@ static void xe_guc_exec_queue_lr_cleanup(struct work_struct *w)
>  					 !exec_queue_pending_disable(q) ||
>  					 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc), HZ * 5);
>  		if (!ret) {
> -			drm_warn(&xe->drm, "Schedule disable failed to respond");
> +			xe_gt_warn(q->gt, "Schedule disable failed to respond\n");
>  			xe_sched_submission_start(sched);
>  			xe_gt_reset_async(q->gt);
>  			return;
> @@ -1801,17 +1800,17 @@ int xe_guc_submit_start(struct xe_guc *guc)
>  static struct xe_exec_queue *
>  g2h_exec_queue_lookup(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 guc_id)
>  {
> -	struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> +	struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
>  	struct xe_exec_queue *q;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(guc_id >= GUC_ID_MAX)) {
> -		drm_err(&xe->drm, "Invalid guc_id %u", guc_id);
> +		xe_gt_err(gt, "Invalid guc_id %u\n", guc_id);
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  
>  	q = xa_load(&guc->submission_state.exec_queue_lookup, guc_id);
>  	if (unlikely(!q)) {
> -		drm_err(&xe->drm, "Not engine present for guc_id %u", guc_id);
> +		xe_gt_err(gt, "Not engine present for guc_id %u\n", guc_id);
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -2039,7 +2038,7 @@ int xe_guc_exec_queue_memory_cat_error_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg,
>  
>  int xe_guc_exec_queue_reset_failure_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 len)
>  {
> -	struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> +	struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
>  	u8 guc_class, instance;
>  	u32 reason;
>  
> @@ -2051,10 +2050,10 @@ int xe_guc_exec_queue_reset_failure_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 le
>  	reason = msg[2];
>  
>  	/* Unexpected failure of a hardware feature, log an actual error */
> -	drm_err(&xe->drm, "GuC engine reset request failed on %d:%d because 0x%08X",
> -		guc_class, instance, reason);
> +	xe_gt_err(gt, "GuC engine reset request failed on %d:%d because 0x%08X",
> +		  guc_class, instance, reason);
>  
> -	xe_gt_reset_async(guc_to_gt(guc));
> +	xe_gt_reset_async(gt);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-07 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-07 19:47 [PATCH 0/2] Prefer GT oriented logs/asserts in submit code Michal Wajdeczko
2024-11-07 19:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/guc: Prefer GT oriented asserts " Michal Wajdeczko
2024-11-07 22:15   ` Matthew Brost
2024-11-07 19:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/guc: Prefer GT oriented logs " Michal Wajdeczko
2024-11-07 22:19   ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2024-11-07 19:53 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Prefer GT oriented logs/asserts " Patchwork
2024-11-07 19:54 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-11-07 19:55 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-11-07 20:06 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-11-07 20:09 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-11-07 20:10 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-11-07 20:34 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-11-09  2:16 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-09 14:14   ` Michal Wajdeczko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zy081U4kGgRNgfwk@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox