Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>,
	"Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <saurabhg.gupta@intel.com>,
	<alex.zuo@intel.com>, <john.c.harrison@intel.com>,
	<matthew.brost@intel.com>,  <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>,
	<alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>, <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/xe_lrc: Rename desc to addr
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 15:37:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZzO8dIiqWMVmMaWy@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241112185515.64060-1-jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>

On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 06:55:15PM +0000, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
> The qualifier "desc" as used in the xe_lrc_snapshot struct is a legacy
> term used by i915 that has been incorrectly applied to some of the
> attributes.  Said attributes that use the "desc" qualifier, namely
> "context_desc" and "indirect_context_desc", would more accurately be
> referred to as addresses, so replace the incorrect "desc" qualifier with
> "addr" in these cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
> CC: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
> CC: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> CC: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
> CC: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
> CC: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c         | 8 ++++----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h         | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
> index cc72446a5de1..b95c21a18c31 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
> @@ -1632,7 +1632,7 @@ xe_engine_manual_capture(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, struct xe_hw_engine_snapshot
>  		if (ge) {
>  			guc_id = ge->guc.id;
>  			if (ge->lrc[0])
> -				lrca = ge->lrc[0]->context_desc;
> +				lrca = ge->lrc[0]->context_addr;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> index 4b65da77c6e0..09f0e66952e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> @@ -1635,8 +1635,8 @@ struct xe_lrc_snapshot *xe_lrc_snapshot_capture(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
>  	if (lrc->bo->vm)
>  		xe_vm_get(lrc->bo->vm);
>  
> -	snapshot->context_desc = xe_lrc_ggtt_addr(lrc);
> -	snapshot->indirect_context_desc = xe_lrc_indirect_ring_ggtt_addr(lrc);
> +	snapshot->context_addr = xe_lrc_ggtt_addr(lrc);
> +	snapshot->indirect_context_addr = xe_lrc_indirect_ring_ggtt_addr(lrc);
>  	snapshot->head = xe_lrc_ring_head(lrc);
>  	snapshot->tail.internal = lrc->ring.tail;
>  	snapshot->tail.memory = xe_lrc_ring_tail(lrc);
> @@ -1692,9 +1692,9 @@ void xe_lrc_snapshot_print(struct xe_lrc_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_printer
>  	if (!snapshot)
>  		return;
>  
> -	drm_printf(p, "\tHW Context Desc: 0x%08x\n", snapshot->context_desc);
> +	drm_printf(p, "\tHW Context Address: 0x%08x\n", snapshot->context_addr);

Cc: Jose

This change may break current user space tools. So we need to avoid.
Everything else should be okay.

>  	drm_printf(p, "\tHW Indirect Ring State: 0x%08x\n",
> -		   snapshot->indirect_context_desc);
> +		   snapshot->indirect_context_addr);
>  	drm_printf(p, "\tLRC Head: (memory) %u\n", snapshot->head);
>  	drm_printf(p, "\tLRC Tail: (internal) %u, (memory) %u\n",
>  		   snapshot->tail.internal, snapshot->tail.memory);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
> index 40d8f6906d3e..f6bf81009294 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
> @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ struct xe_lrc_snapshot {
>  	void *lrc_snapshot;
>  	unsigned long lrc_size, lrc_offset;
>  
> -	u32 context_desc;
> -	u32 indirect_context_desc;
> +	u32 context_addr;
> +	u32 indirect_context_addr;
>  	u32 head;
>  	struct {
>  		u32 internal;
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-12 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-12 18:55 [PATCH] drm/xe/xe_lrc: Rename desc to addr Jonathan Cavitt
2024-11-12 19:08 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2024-11-12 19:57 ` Matt Roper
2024-11-12 20:38   ` John Harrison
2024-11-12 20:37 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-11-12 20:57   ` Souza, Jose
2024-11-13  9:23 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-11-13  9:23 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-11-13  9:25 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-11-13  9:40 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-11-13  9:42 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-11-13  9:43 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-11-13 10:12 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-11-13 12:38 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZzO8dIiqWMVmMaWy@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com \
    --cc=alex.zuo@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=saurabhg.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox