From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>,
"Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <saurabhg.gupta@intel.com>,
<alex.zuo@intel.com>, <john.c.harrison@intel.com>,
<matthew.brost@intel.com>, <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>,
<alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>, <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/xe_lrc: Rename desc to addr
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 15:37:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZzO8dIiqWMVmMaWy@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241112185515.64060-1-jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 06:55:15PM +0000, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
> The qualifier "desc" as used in the xe_lrc_snapshot struct is a legacy
> term used by i915 that has been incorrectly applied to some of the
> attributes. Said attributes that use the "desc" qualifier, namely
> "context_desc" and "indirect_context_desc", would more accurately be
> referred to as addresses, so replace the incorrect "desc" qualifier with
> "addr" in these cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
> CC: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
> CC: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> CC: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
> CC: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
> CC: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
> index cc72446a5de1..b95c21a18c31 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
> @@ -1632,7 +1632,7 @@ xe_engine_manual_capture(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, struct xe_hw_engine_snapshot
> if (ge) {
> guc_id = ge->guc.id;
> if (ge->lrc[0])
> - lrca = ge->lrc[0]->context_desc;
> + lrca = ge->lrc[0]->context_addr;
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> index 4b65da77c6e0..09f0e66952e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> @@ -1635,8 +1635,8 @@ struct xe_lrc_snapshot *xe_lrc_snapshot_capture(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
> if (lrc->bo->vm)
> xe_vm_get(lrc->bo->vm);
>
> - snapshot->context_desc = xe_lrc_ggtt_addr(lrc);
> - snapshot->indirect_context_desc = xe_lrc_indirect_ring_ggtt_addr(lrc);
> + snapshot->context_addr = xe_lrc_ggtt_addr(lrc);
> + snapshot->indirect_context_addr = xe_lrc_indirect_ring_ggtt_addr(lrc);
> snapshot->head = xe_lrc_ring_head(lrc);
> snapshot->tail.internal = lrc->ring.tail;
> snapshot->tail.memory = xe_lrc_ring_tail(lrc);
> @@ -1692,9 +1692,9 @@ void xe_lrc_snapshot_print(struct xe_lrc_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_printer
> if (!snapshot)
> return;
>
> - drm_printf(p, "\tHW Context Desc: 0x%08x\n", snapshot->context_desc);
> + drm_printf(p, "\tHW Context Address: 0x%08x\n", snapshot->context_addr);
Cc: Jose
This change may break current user space tools. So we need to avoid.
Everything else should be okay.
> drm_printf(p, "\tHW Indirect Ring State: 0x%08x\n",
> - snapshot->indirect_context_desc);
> + snapshot->indirect_context_addr);
> drm_printf(p, "\tLRC Head: (memory) %u\n", snapshot->head);
> drm_printf(p, "\tLRC Tail: (internal) %u, (memory) %u\n",
> snapshot->tail.internal, snapshot->tail.memory);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
> index 40d8f6906d3e..f6bf81009294 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
> @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ struct xe_lrc_snapshot {
> void *lrc_snapshot;
> unsigned long lrc_size, lrc_offset;
>
> - u32 context_desc;
> - u32 indirect_context_desc;
> + u32 context_addr;
> + u32 indirect_context_addr;
> u32 head;
> struct {
> u32 internal;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-12 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-12 18:55 [PATCH] drm/xe/xe_lrc: Rename desc to addr Jonathan Cavitt
2024-11-12 19:08 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2024-11-12 19:57 ` Matt Roper
2024-11-12 20:38 ` John Harrison
2024-11-12 20:37 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-11-12 20:57 ` Souza, Jose
2024-11-13 9:23 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-11-13 9:23 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-11-13 9:25 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-11-13 9:40 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-11-13 9:42 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-11-13 9:43 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-11-13 10:12 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-11-13 12:38 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZzO8dIiqWMVmMaWy@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com \
--cc=alex.zuo@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=saurabhg.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox