From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/irq: hide display_irqs_enabled access
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:55:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZzY5f-p1ERZwH7mj@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6dcb90c7786532c7df0281e29a3e680c9551f060.1731347547.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 07:53:33PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Move the check for display_irqs_enabled within vlv_display_irq_reset()
> and vlv_display_irq_postinstall() to avoid looking at struct
> intel_display members within i915 core irq code.
>
> Within display irq code, vlv_display_irq_reset() may need to be called
> with !display_irqs_enabled, so add a small wrapper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 12 ++++--------
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c
> index e1547ebce60e..d5458b0d976b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c
> @@ -1479,7 +1479,7 @@ void bdw_disable_vblank(struct drm_crtc *_crtc)
> schedule_work(&display->irq.vblank_dc_work);
> }
>
> -void vlv_display_irq_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +static void _vlv_display_irq_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> struct intel_uncore *uncore = &dev_priv->uncore;
>
> @@ -1497,6 +1497,12 @@ void vlv_display_irq_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> dev_priv->irq_mask = ~0u;
> }
>
> +void vlv_display_irq_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> + if (dev_priv->display.irq.display_irqs_enabled)
> + _vlv_display_irq_reset(dev_priv);
> +}
> +
> void i9xx_display_irq_reset(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> if (I915_HAS_HOTPLUG(i915)) {
> @@ -1516,6 +1522,9 @@ void vlv_display_irq_postinstall(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> u32 enable_mask;
> enum pipe pipe;
>
> + if (!dev_priv->display.irq.display_irqs_enabled)
> + return;
I got confused here. this likely deserves a separate patch?
> +
> pipestat_mask = PIPE_CRC_DONE_INTERRUPT_STATUS;
>
> i915_enable_pipestat(dev_priv, PIPE_A, PIPE_GMBUS_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
> @@ -1694,7 +1703,7 @@ void valleyview_enable_display_irqs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> dev_priv->display.irq.display_irqs_enabled = true;
>
> if (intel_irqs_enabled(dev_priv)) {
> - vlv_display_irq_reset(dev_priv);
> + _vlv_display_irq_reset(dev_priv);
> vlv_display_irq_postinstall(dev_priv);
> }
> }
> @@ -1709,7 +1718,7 @@ void valleyview_disable_display_irqs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> dev_priv->display.irq.display_irqs_enabled = false;
>
> if (intel_irqs_enabled(dev_priv))
> - vlv_display_irq_reset(dev_priv);
> + _vlv_display_irq_reset(dev_priv);
> }
>
> void ilk_de_irq_postinstall(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index f75cbf5b8a1c..7920ad9585ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -658,8 +658,7 @@ static void valleyview_irq_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> gen5_gt_irq_reset(to_gt(dev_priv));
>
> spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> - if (dev_priv->display.irq.display_irqs_enabled)
> - vlv_display_irq_reset(dev_priv);
> + vlv_display_irq_reset(dev_priv);
> spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> }
>
> @@ -723,8 +722,7 @@ static void cherryview_irq_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> gen2_irq_reset(uncore, GEN8_PCU_IRQ_REGS);
>
> spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> - if (dev_priv->display.irq.display_irqs_enabled)
> - vlv_display_irq_reset(dev_priv);
> + vlv_display_irq_reset(dev_priv);
> spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> }
>
> @@ -740,8 +738,7 @@ static void valleyview_irq_postinstall(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> gen5_gt_irq_postinstall(to_gt(dev_priv));
>
> spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> - if (dev_priv->display.irq.display_irqs_enabled)
> - vlv_display_irq_postinstall(dev_priv);
> + vlv_display_irq_postinstall(dev_priv);
> spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>
> intel_uncore_write(&dev_priv->uncore, VLV_MASTER_IER, MASTER_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
> @@ -794,8 +791,7 @@ static void cherryview_irq_postinstall(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> gen8_gt_irq_postinstall(to_gt(dev_priv));
>
> spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> - if (dev_priv->display.irq.display_irqs_enabled)
> - vlv_display_irq_postinstall(dev_priv);
> + vlv_display_irq_postinstall(dev_priv);
> spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>
> intel_uncore_write(&dev_priv->uncore, GEN8_MASTER_IRQ, GEN8_MASTER_IRQ_CONTROL);
> --
> 2.39.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-14 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-11 17:53 [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915: intel_display conversions, cleanups Jani Nikula
2024-11-11 17:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/overlay: convert to struct intel_display Jani Nikula
2024-11-12 20:40 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-13 8:26 ` Jani Nikula
2024-11-11 17:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/overlay: add intel_overlay_available() and use it Jani Nikula
2024-11-14 17:51 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-11 17:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/plane: convert initial plane setup to struct intel_display Jani Nikula
2024-11-14 17:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-11 17:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/irq: hide display_irqs_enabled access Jani Nikula
2024-11-14 17:55 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-11-15 13:13 ` Jani Nikula
2024-11-15 19:10 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-11 17:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/irq: emphasize display_irqs_enabled is only about VLV/CHV Jani Nikula
2024-11-14 17:57 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-15 13:15 ` Jani Nikula
2024-11-15 19:11 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-11 18:02 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915: intel_display conversions, cleanups Patchwork
2024-11-11 18:02 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-11-11 18:04 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-11-11 18:15 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-11-11 18:17 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-11-11 18:19 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-11-11 19:01 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-11-11 20:17 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZzY5f-p1ERZwH7mj@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox