From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.auld@intel.com, nirmoy.das@intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] drm/xe: Build PM into GuC CT layer
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 20:46:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a49fd80e-a772-43b4-acc4-b2f15ca873e5@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240718173445.1490455-2-matthew.brost@intel.com>
On 7/18/2024 7:34 PM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Take PM ref when any G2H are outstanding, drop when none are
> outstanding.
>
> To safely ensure we have PM ref when in the GuC CT layer, a PM ref needs
> to be held when scheduler messages are pending too.
>
> v2:
> - Add outer PM protections to xe_file_close (CI)
> v3:
> - Only take PM ref 0->1 and drop on 1->0 (Matthew Auld)
>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 4 ++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 8 +++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 4 ++++
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index 06cebaffb451..b68ab474e1a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,8 @@ static void xe_file_close(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
> struct xe_exec_queue *q;
> unsigned long idx;
>
> + xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> +
> /*
> * No need for exec_queue.lock here as there is no contention for it
> * when FD is closing as IOCTLs presumably can't be modifying the
> @@ -126,6 +128,8 @@ static void xe_file_close(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
>
> xe_drm_client_put(xef->client);
> kfree(xef);
> +
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> }
>
> static const struct drm_ioctl_desc xe_ioctls[] = {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> index 7d2e937da1d8..e1d179fb7f43 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> @@ -327,6 +327,8 @@ static void xe_guc_ct_set_state(struct xe_guc_ct *ct,
> xe_gt_assert(ct_to_gt(ct), ct->g2h_outstanding == 0 ||
> state == XE_GUC_CT_STATE_STOPPED);
>
> + if (ct->g2h_outstanding)
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(ct_to_xe(ct));
> ct->g2h_outstanding = 0;
> ct->state = state;
>
> @@ -499,6 +501,9 @@ static void __g2h_reserve_space(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, u32 g2h_len, u32 num_g2h)
> if (g2h_len) {
> lockdep_assert_held(&ct->fast_lock);
>
> + if (!ct->g2h_outstanding)
> + xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(ct_to_xe(ct));
> +
> ct->ctbs.g2h.info.space -= g2h_len;
> ct->g2h_outstanding += num_g2h;
> }
> @@ -511,7 +516,8 @@ static void __g2h_release_space(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, u32 g2h_len)
> ct->ctbs.g2h.info.size - ct->ctbs.g2h.info.resv_space);
>
> ct->ctbs.g2h.info.space += g2h_len;
> - --ct->g2h_outstanding;
> + if (!--ct->g2h_outstanding)
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(ct_to_xe(ct));
> }
>
> static void g2h_release_space(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, u32 g2h_len)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> index 860405527115..993d0344dc88 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> @@ -1402,6 +1402,8 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_process_msg(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
> default:
> XE_WARN_ON("Unknown message type");
> }
> +
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(guc_to_xe(exec_queue_to_guc(msg->private_data)));
> }
>
> static const struct drm_sched_backend_ops drm_sched_ops = {
> @@ -1492,6 +1494,8 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_kill(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> static void guc_exec_queue_add_msg(struct xe_exec_queue *q, struct xe_sched_msg *msg,
> u32 opcode)
> {
> + xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(guc_to_xe(exec_queue_to_guc(q)));
> +
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msg->link);
> msg->opcode = opcode;
> msg->private_data = q;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-18 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-18 17:34 [PATCH v3 0/1] Build PM into GuC CT layer Matthew Brost
2024-07-18 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] drm/xe: " Matthew Brost
2024-07-18 17:52 ` Matthew Auld
2024-07-18 18:00 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-18 18:46 ` Nirmoy Das [this message]
2024-07-18 17:39 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Build PM into GuC CT layer (rev2) Patchwork
2024-07-18 17:40 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-07-18 17:41 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-07-18 17:53 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-07-18 17:55 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-07-18 17:56 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-07-18 18:19 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-07-18 18:42 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-19 0:35 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a49fd80e-a772-43b4-acc4-b2f15ca873e5@linux.intel.com \
--to=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox