From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Decouple GuC RC code from xe_guc_pc
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 17:20:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a606b491-c841-4bd0-89a7-36b76058f563@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251205143815.1343989-2-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
On 12/5/2025 3:38 PM, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> Move enable/disable GuC RC logic into the new file. This will
> allow us to independently enable/disable GuC RC and not rely
> on SLPC related functions. GuC already provides separate H2G
> interfaces to setup GuC RC and SLPC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c | 5 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c | 50 -------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h | 18 +++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c | 7 +-
> 7 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> index a7e13a676f7d..d1258bd22752 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ xe-y += xe_bb.o \
> xe_guc_log.o \
> xe_guc_pagefault.o \
> xe_guc_pc.o \
> + xe_guc_rc.o \
> xe_guc_submit.o \
> xe_guc_tlb_inval.o \
> xe_heci_gsc.o \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> index 88376bc2a483..72740d17c769 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> #include "xe_guc_klv_helpers.h"
> #include "xe_guc_log.h"
> #include "xe_guc_pc.h"
> +#include "xe_guc_rc.h"
> #include "xe_guc_relay.h"
> #include "xe_guc_submit.h"
> #include "xe_memirq.h"
> @@ -865,6 +866,10 @@ int xe_guc_init_post_hwconfig(struct xe_guc *guc)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + ret = xe_guc_rc_init(guc_to_gt(guc));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> ret = xe_guc_engine_activity_init(guc);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> index e2e6edb851ae..5ced9ef37cf3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> @@ -253,22 +253,6 @@ static int pc_action_unset_param(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u8 id)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int pc_action_setup_gucrc(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u32 mode)
> -{
> - struct xe_guc_ct *ct = pc_to_ct(pc);
> - u32 action[] = {
> - GUC_ACTION_HOST2GUC_SETUP_PC_GUCRC,
> - mode,
> - };
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = xe_guc_ct_send(ct, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), 0, 0);
> - if (ret && !(xe_device_wedged(pc_to_xe(pc)) && ret == -ECANCELED))
> - xe_gt_err(pc_to_gt(pc), "GuC RC enable mode=%u failed: %pe\n",
> - mode, ERR_PTR(ret));
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> static u32 decode_freq(u32 raw)
> {
> return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(raw * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER,
> @@ -1050,30 +1034,6 @@ int xe_guc_pc_restore_stashed_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -/**
> - * xe_guc_pc_gucrc_disable - Disable GuC RC
> - * @pc: Xe_GuC_PC instance
> - *
> - * Disables GuC RC by taking control of RC6 back from GuC.
> - *
> - * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on error.
> - */
> -int xe_guc_pc_gucrc_disable(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> -{
> - struct xe_device *xe = pc_to_xe(pc);
> - struct xe_gt *gt = pc_to_gt(pc);
> - int ret = 0;
> -
> - if (xe->info.skip_guc_pc)
> - return 0;
> -
> - ret = pc_action_setup_gucrc(pc, GUCRC_HOST_CONTROL);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - return xe_gt_idle_disable_c6(gt);
> -}
> -
> /**
> * xe_guc_pc_override_gucrc_mode - override GUCRC mode
> * @pc: Xe_GuC_PC instance
> @@ -1257,15 +1217,6 @@ int xe_guc_pc_start(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (xe->info.platform == XE_PVC) {
> - xe_guc_pc_gucrc_disable(pc);
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - ret = pc_action_setup_gucrc(pc, GUCRC_FIRMWARE_CONTROL);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> /* Enable SLPC Optimized Strategy for compute */
> ret = pc_action_set_strategy(pc, SLPC_OPTIMIZED_STRATEGY_COMPUTE);
>
> @@ -1310,7 +1261,6 @@ static void xe_guc_pc_fini_hw(void *arg)
> return;
>
> CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(pc_to_gt(pc)), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> - xe_guc_pc_gucrc_disable(pc);
> XE_WARN_ON(xe_guc_pc_stop(pc));
>
> /* Bind requested freq to mert_freq_cap before unload */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
> index 0e31396f103c..1b95873b262e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
> @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ struct drm_printer;
> int xe_guc_pc_init(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
> int xe_guc_pc_start(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
> int xe_guc_pc_stop(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
> -int xe_guc_pc_gucrc_disable(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
> int xe_guc_pc_override_gucrc_mode(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, enum slpc_gucrc_mode mode);
> int xe_guc_pc_unset_gucrc_mode(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
> void xe_guc_pc_print(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, struct drm_printer *p);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..945433ef35f0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include "xe_guc_rc.h"
> +
> +#include <drm/drm_managed.h>
since you are using dev-managed action, maybe it should be:
#include <linux/device/devres.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_print.h>
> +
> +#include "abi/guc_actions_slpc_abi.h"
> +#include "xe_device.h"
> +#include "xe_force_wake.h"
> +#include "xe_gt.h"
> +#include "xe_gt_idle.h"
> +#include "xe_gt_printk.h"
> +#include "xe_guc_ct.h"
> +#include "xe_pm.h"
> +
> +/**
> + * DOC: GuC RC
> + * ================
remove this underline, this is not a RST
> + *
> + * GuC handles the GT transition to deeper C-states in conjunction with Pcode.
> + * GuC RC can be enabled independently of DVFS, which is also controlled
> + * by GuC.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +static int guc_action_setup_gucrc(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 control)
for "guc_action" functions we usually pass "guc" as param, not "gt"
> +{
> + struct xe_guc_ct *ct = >->uc.guc.ct;
> + u32 action[] = {
> + GUC_ACTION_HOST2GUC_SETUP_PC_GUCRC,
> + control,
> + };
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = xe_guc_ct_send(ct, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), 0, 0);
> + if (ret && !(xe_device_wedged(gt_to_xe(gt)) && ret == -ECANCELED))
btw, is this wedged/ECANCELED check a GuC RC specific case or generic?
if latter maybe we should return dedicated error code from CTB ?
> + xe_gt_err(gt, "GuC RC enable control=%u failed: %pe\n",
> + control, ERR_PTR(ret));
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_guc_rc_disable - Disable GuC RC
for function doc, we should add () to function name
* xe_guc_rc_disable() - Disable GuC RC
> + * @gt: Xe GT instance
hmm, as feature and file have "GuC" in their names, why functions take "gt"?
they should take "guc" like all other "xe_guc" functions
> + *
> + * Disables GuC RC by taking control of RC6 back from GuC.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on error.
> + */
> +int xe_guc_rc_disable(struct xe_gt *gt)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (xe->info.skip_guc_pc)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = guc_action_setup_gucrc(gt, GUCRC_HOST_CONTROL);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return xe_gt_idle_disable_c6(gt);
> +}
> +
> +static void xe_guc_rc_fini_hw(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct xe_gt *gt = arg;
> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> +
> + if (xe_device_wedged(xe))
> + return;
> +
> + CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> + xe_guc_rc_disable(gt);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_guc_rc_init - Initialize GuC RC
> + * @gt: Xe GT instance
> + *
> + * Initializes GuC RC feature.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on error.
> + */
> +int xe_guc_rc_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> +
> + if (xe->info.skip_guc_pc)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_guc_rc_fini_hw, gt);
> +}
> +
> +static int xe_guc_rc_enable(struct xe_gt *gt)
> +{
> + return guc_action_setup_gucrc(gt, GUCRC_FIRMWARE_CONTROL);
> +}
> +
missing kernel-doc
> +int xe_guc_rc_start(struct xe_gt *gt)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> + int ret;
> +
> + xe_gt_assert(gt, xe_device_uc_enabled(xe));
> +
> + CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> + if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref.domains, XE_FW_GT))
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +
> + if (xe->info.skip_guc_pc) {
> + if (xe->info.platform != XE_PVC)
> + xe_gt_idle_enable_c6(gt);
> +
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (xe->info.platform == XE_PVC) {
> + xe_guc_rc_disable(gt);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return xe_guc_rc_enable(gt);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3a8c8d50313f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _XE_GUC_RC_H_
> +#define _XE_GUC_RC_H_
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +struct xe_gt;
> +enum slpc_gucrc_mode;
enum forward not needed here
> +
> +int xe_guc_rc_disable(struct xe_gt *gt);
> +int xe_guc_rc_start(struct xe_gt *gt);
> +int xe_guc_rc_init(struct xe_gt *gt);
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c
> index 157520ea1783..44e5fabe2a50 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include "xe_gt_sriov_vf.h"
> #include "xe_guc.h"
> #include "xe_guc_pc.h"
> +#include "xe_guc_rc.h"
> #include "xe_guc_engine_activity.h"
> #include "xe_huc.h"
> #include "xe_sriov.h"
> @@ -216,6 +217,10 @@ int xe_uc_load_hw(struct xe_uc *uc)
> if (ret)
> goto err_out;
>
> + ret = xe_guc_rc_start(uc_to_gt(uc));
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_out;
> +
> xe_guc_engine_activity_enable_stats(&uc->guc);
>
> /* We don't fail the driver load if HuC fails to auth */
> @@ -246,7 +251,7 @@ int xe_uc_reset_prepare(struct xe_uc *uc)
>
> void xe_uc_gucrc_disable(struct xe_uc *uc)
> {
> - XE_WARN_ON(xe_guc_pc_gucrc_disable(&uc->guc.pc));
> + XE_WARN_ON(xe_guc_rc_disable(uc_to_gt(uc)));
maybe use xe_gt_WARN_ONCE_ON(gt, ...) here
> }
>
> void xe_uc_stop_prepare(struct xe_uc *uc)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-05 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-05 14:38 [PATCH 0/2] drm/xe: Separate out GuC RC code Vinay Belgaumkar
2025-12-05 14:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Decouple GuC RC code from xe_guc_pc Vinay Belgaumkar
2025-12-05 16:20 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2025-12-08 23:49 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2025-12-05 14:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Add a wrapper for set/unset params Vinay Belgaumkar
2025-12-05 18:55 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Separate out GuC RC code Patchwork
2025-12-05 18:57 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-12-05 20:08 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-12-06 2:52 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a606b491-c841-4bd0-89a7-36b76058f563@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox