Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Fix memory leak on xe_alloc_pf_queue failure
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:52:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a7bcbf49-75d2-4b9c-b49f-11f6d348a7ab@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240822081325.1549-1-nirmoy.das@intel.com>

On 22/08/2024 09:13, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> Free up previously allocated pf_queue[i].data on error.
> 
> Fixes: 3338e4f90c14 ("drm/xe: Use topology to determine page fault queue size")
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c | 6 +++++-
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c
> index 0be4687bfc20..c19944eed5bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c
> @@ -437,9 +437,13 @@ int xe_gt_pagefault_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < NUM_PF_QUEUE; ++i) {
>   		ret = xe_alloc_pf_queue(gt, &gt->usm.pf_queue[i]);
> -		if (ret)
> +		if (ret) {
> +			while (i-- > 0)
> +				kfree(gt->usm.pf_queue[i].data);
>   			return ret;
> +		}
>   	}

I think this will then also leak below, if one of the queue create 
fails? Maybe just convert this over to devm_calloc or similar that way 
we don't need to do the manual unwind.

> +
>   	for (i = 0; i < NUM_ACC_QUEUE; ++i) {
>   		gt->usm.acc_queue[i].gt = gt;
>   		spin_lock_init(&gt->usm.acc_queue[i].lock);

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-22  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-22  8:13 [PATCH] drm/xe: Fix memory leak on xe_alloc_pf_queue failure Nirmoy Das
2024-08-22  8:52 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2024-08-22  9:10   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-22  8:52 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-08-22  8:53 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-08-22  8:54 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-08-22  9:06 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-08-22  9:08 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-08-22  9:11 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-08-22  9:30 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-08-22 12:52 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a7bcbf49-75d2-4b9c-b49f-11f6d348a7ab@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox