From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/xe: Decouple GuC RC code from xe_guc_pc
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 22:04:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a981d6fd-09b1-43d4-9797-e1ce0fda2ba4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251218015340.3800280-2-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
On 12/18/2025 2:53 AM, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> Move enable/disable GuC RC logic into the new file. This will
> allow us to independently enable/disable GuC RC and not rely
> on SLPC related functions. GuC already provides separate H2G
> interfaces to setup GuC RC and SLPC.
>
> v2: Comments (Michal W), remove duplicate c6_enable calls from
> xe_guc_pc.
>
> v3: Clarify crosss interactions between xe_guc_rc and xe_guc_pc (Michal W)
nit: change log could be under ---
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c | 5 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c | 70 +++--------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h | 20 +++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c | 8 +-
> 7 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> index 6ecba27d85f7..90f86ad11498 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ xe-y += xe_bb.o \
> xe_guc_log.o \
> xe_guc_pagefault.o \
> xe_guc_pc.o \
> + xe_guc_rc.o \
> xe_guc_submit.o \
> xe_guc_tlb_inval.o \
> xe_heci_gsc.o \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> index f0407bab9a0c..d05380893f39 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> #include "xe_guc_klv_helpers.h"
> #include "xe_guc_log.h"
> #include "xe_guc_pc.h"
> +#include "xe_guc_rc.h"
> #include "xe_guc_relay.h"
> #include "xe_guc_submit.h"
> #include "xe_memirq.h"
> @@ -865,6 +866,10 @@ int xe_guc_init_post_hwconfig(struct xe_guc *guc)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + ret = xe_guc_rc_init(guc);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> ret = xe_guc_engine_activity_init(guc);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> index e2e6edb851ae..e7c90b6244e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,6 @@
> * exposes a programming interface to the host for the control of SLPC.
> *
> * Frequency management:
> - * =====================
> *
> * Xe driver enables SLPC with all of its defaults features and frequency
> * selection, which varies per platform.
> @@ -86,12 +85,20 @@
> * thus saving power. Base profile is default and ensures balanced performance
> * for any workload.
> *
> - * Render-C States:
> - * ================
> + * Render-C States (GuC RC):
> *
> * Render-C states is also a GuC PC feature that is now enabled in Xe for
> * all platforms.
> *
> + * The implementation for GuC Power Management features is split as follows:
> + *
> + * xe_guc_rc: Logic for handling GuC RC
> + * xe_gt_idle: Host side logic for RC6 and Coarse Power gating (CPG)
> + * xe_guc_pc: Logic for all other SLPC related features
> + *
> + * There is some cross interaction between these where host C6 will need to be
> + * enabled when we plan to skip GuC RC. Also, the GuC RC mode is currently
> + * overridden through 0x3003 which is an SLPC H2G call.
> */
>
> static struct xe_guc *pc_to_guc(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> @@ -253,22 +260,6 @@ static int pc_action_unset_param(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u8 id)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int pc_action_setup_gucrc(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u32 mode)
> -{
> - struct xe_guc_ct *ct = pc_to_ct(pc);
> - u32 action[] = {
> - GUC_ACTION_HOST2GUC_SETUP_PC_GUCRC,
> - mode,
> - };
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = xe_guc_ct_send(ct, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), 0, 0);
> - if (ret && !(xe_device_wedged(pc_to_xe(pc)) && ret == -ECANCELED))
> - xe_gt_err(pc_to_gt(pc), "GuC RC enable mode=%u failed: %pe\n",
> - mode, ERR_PTR(ret));
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> static u32 decode_freq(u32 raw)
> {
> return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(raw * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER,
> @@ -1050,30 +1041,6 @@ int xe_guc_pc_restore_stashed_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -/**
> - * xe_guc_pc_gucrc_disable - Disable GuC RC
> - * @pc: Xe_GuC_PC instance
> - *
> - * Disables GuC RC by taking control of RC6 back from GuC.
> - *
> - * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on error.
> - */
> -int xe_guc_pc_gucrc_disable(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> -{
> - struct xe_device *xe = pc_to_xe(pc);
> - struct xe_gt *gt = pc_to_gt(pc);
> - int ret = 0;
> -
> - if (xe->info.skip_guc_pc)
> - return 0;
> -
> - ret = pc_action_setup_gucrc(pc, GUCRC_HOST_CONTROL);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - return xe_gt_idle_disable_c6(gt);
> -}
> -
> /**
> * xe_guc_pc_override_gucrc_mode - override GUCRC mode
> * @pc: Xe_GuC_PC instance
> @@ -1217,9 +1184,6 @@ int xe_guc_pc_start(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
>
> if (xe->info.skip_guc_pc) {
> - if (xe->info.platform != XE_PVC)
> - xe_gt_idle_enable_c6(gt);
> -
> /* Request max possible since dynamic freq mgmt is not enabled */
> pc_set_cur_freq(pc, UINT_MAX);
> return 0;
> @@ -1257,15 +1221,6 @@ int xe_guc_pc_start(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (xe->info.platform == XE_PVC) {
> - xe_guc_pc_gucrc_disable(pc);
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - ret = pc_action_setup_gucrc(pc, GUCRC_FIRMWARE_CONTROL);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> /* Enable SLPC Optimized Strategy for compute */
> ret = pc_action_set_strategy(pc, SLPC_OPTIMIZED_STRATEGY_COMPUTE);
>
> @@ -1285,10 +1240,8 @@ int xe_guc_pc_stop(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> {
> struct xe_device *xe = pc_to_xe(pc);
>
> - if (xe->info.skip_guc_pc) {
> - xe_gt_idle_disable_c6(pc_to_gt(pc));
> + if (xe->info.skip_guc_pc)
> return 0;
> - }
>
> mutex_lock(&pc->freq_lock);
> pc->freq_ready = false;
> @@ -1310,7 +1263,6 @@ static void xe_guc_pc_fini_hw(void *arg)
> return;
>
> CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(pc_to_gt(pc)), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> - xe_guc_pc_gucrc_disable(pc);
> XE_WARN_ON(xe_guc_pc_stop(pc));
>
> /* Bind requested freq to mert_freq_cap before unload */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
> index 0e31396f103c..1b95873b262e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
> @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ struct drm_printer;
> int xe_guc_pc_init(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
> int xe_guc_pc_start(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
> int xe_guc_pc_stop(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
> -int xe_guc_pc_gucrc_disable(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
> int xe_guc_pc_override_gucrc_mode(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, enum slpc_gucrc_mode mode);
> int xe_guc_pc_unset_gucrc_mode(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
> void xe_guc_pc_print(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, struct drm_printer *p);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..321a071b7932
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/device/devres.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_print.h>
> +
> +#include "abi/guc_actions_slpc_abi.h"
> +#include "xe_device.h"
> +#include "xe_force_wake.h"
> +#include "xe_gt.h"
> +#include "xe_guc.h"
> +#include "xe_gt_idle.h"
> +#include "xe_gt_printk.h"
> +#include "xe_guc_ct.h"
> +#include "xe_guc_rc.h"
> +#include "xe_pm.h"
> +
> +/**
> + * DOC: GuC RC (Render C-states)
> + *
> + * GuC handles the GT transition to deeper C-states in conjunction with Pcode.
> + * GuC RC can be enabled independently of the frequency component in SLPC, which is
> + * also controlled by GuC.
> + *
> + * This file will contain all H2G related logic for handling Render C-states. There are
> + * some calls to xe_gt_idle, where we enable host C6 when GuC RC is skipped. GuC RC
> + * is mostly independent of xe_guc_pc with the exception of functions that override the mode
> + * for which we have to rely on the SLPC H2G calls.
nit: I guess we try to fit comments in regular 80 columns, and only let the code go up to 100
> + */
> +
> +static int guc_action_setup_gucrc(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 control)
> +{
> + u32 action[] = {
> + GUC_ACTION_HOST2GUC_SETUP_PC_GUCRC,
> + control,
> + };
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = xe_guc_ct_send(&guc->ct, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), 0, 0);
> + if (ret && !(xe_device_wedged(guc_to_xe(guc)) && ret == -ECANCELED))
> + xe_gt_err(guc_to_gt(guc),
> + "GuC RC setup %s(%u) failed (%pe)\n",
> + control == GUCRC_HOST_CONTROL ? "HOST_CONTROL" :
> + control == GUCRC_FIRMWARE_CONTROL ? "FIRMWARE_CONTROL" :
> + "UNKNOWN", control, ERR_PTR(ret));
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_guc_rc_disable() - Disable GuC RC
> + * @guc: Xe GuC instance
> + *
> + * Disables GuC RC by taking control of RC6 back from GuC.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on error.
> + */
> +int xe_guc_rc_disable(struct xe_guc *guc)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (xe->info.skip_guc_pc)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = guc_action_setup_gucrc(guc, GUCRC_HOST_CONTROL);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return xe_gt_idle_disable_c6(guc_to_gt(guc));
> +}
> +
> +static void xe_guc_rc_fini_hw(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct xe_guc *guc = arg;
> + struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> + struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> +
> + if (xe_device_wedged(xe))
> + return;
> +
> + CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> + xe_guc_rc_disable(guc);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_guc_rc_init() - Initialize GuC RC
> + * @guc: Xe GuC instance
> + *
> + * Initializes GuC RC feature.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on error.
> + */
> +int xe_guc_rc_init(struct xe_guc *guc)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> +
should we care about xe_device_uc_enabled() like we have below?
> + if (xe->info.skip_guc_pc)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_guc_rc_fini_hw, guc);
> +}
> +
> +static int xe_guc_rc_enable(struct xe_guc *guc)
> +{
> + return guc_action_setup_gucrc(guc, GUCRC_FIRMWARE_CONTROL);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_guc_rc_start() - Enable GuC RC feature if applicable
> + * @guc: Xe GuC instance
> + *
> + * Enables GuC RC feature.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on error.
> + */
> +int xe_guc_rc_start(struct xe_guc *guc)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> + struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> +
> + xe_gt_assert(gt, xe_device_uc_enabled(xe));
> +
> + CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> + if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref.domains, XE_FW_GT))
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +
> + if (xe->info.platform == XE_PVC)
> + return xe_guc_rc_disable(guc);
> +
> + if (xe->info.skip_guc_pc) {
> + xe_gt_idle_enable_c6(gt);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return xe_guc_rc_enable(guc);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2500b0d1c151
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_rc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _XE_GUC_RC_H_
> +#define _XE_GUC_RC_H_
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
still not needed
did you miss [1] ?
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/694838/?series=159128&rev=1#comment_1276769
> +
> +#include "xe_guc.h"
still not needed
> +
> +struct xe_gt;
still not needed
> +struct xe_guc;
> +
> +int xe_guc_rc_disable(struct xe_guc *guc);
> +int xe_guc_rc_start(struct xe_guc *guc);
> +int xe_guc_rc_init(struct xe_guc *guc);
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c
> index 157520ea1783..91eaddad331e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include "xe_gt_sriov_vf.h"
> #include "xe_guc.h"
> #include "xe_guc_pc.h"
> +#include "xe_guc_rc.h"
> #include "xe_guc_engine_activity.h"
> #include "xe_huc.h"
> #include "xe_sriov.h"
> @@ -216,6 +217,10 @@ int xe_uc_load_hw(struct xe_uc *uc)
> if (ret)
> goto err_out;
>
> + ret = xe_guc_rc_start(&uc->guc);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_out;
> +
> xe_guc_engine_activity_enable_stats(&uc->guc);
>
> /* We don't fail the driver load if HuC fails to auth */
> @@ -246,7 +251,8 @@ int xe_uc_reset_prepare(struct xe_uc *uc)
>
> void xe_uc_gucrc_disable(struct xe_uc *uc)
again, do we really need this as separate uc call?
> {
> - XE_WARN_ON(xe_guc_pc_gucrc_disable(&uc->guc.pc));
> + xe_gt_WARN_ONCE(uc_to_gt(uc), xe_guc_rc_disable(&uc->guc) != 0,
> + "Unable to disable GuC RC for gt: %d", uc_to_gt(uc)->info.id);
again, can't we have this in xe_guc_rc_disable?
> }
>
> void xe_uc_stop_prepare(struct xe_uc *uc)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-18 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-18 1:53 [PATCH v3 0/2] drm/xe: drm/xe: Separate out GuC RC code Vinay Belgaumkar
2025-12-18 1:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/xe: Decouple GuC RC code from xe_guc_pc Vinay Belgaumkar
2025-12-18 21:04 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2025-12-23 8:44 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2025-12-18 1:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/xe: Add a wrapper for set/unset params Vinay Belgaumkar
2025-12-18 2:02 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: drm/xe: Separate out GuC RC code (rev2) Patchwork
2025-12-18 2:03 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-12-18 2:37 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-12-19 0:54 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a981d6fd-09b1-43d4-9797-e1ce0fda2ba4@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox