Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Himal Prasad Ghimiray" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/migrate: make MI_TLB_INVALIDATE conditional
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 09:11:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFWIS3/rlAWSlF6K@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250620152446.239699-2-matthew.auld@intel.com>

On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 04:24:47PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> When clearing VRAM we should be able to skip invalidating the TLBs if we

For copies, we always program SRAM PTEs, and need a invalidate?
Maybe mention this in the commit message.

> are only using the identity map to access VRAM (which is the common
> case), since no modifications are made to PTEs on the fly. Also since we
> use huge 1G entries within the identity map, there should be a pretty
> decent chance that the next packet(s) (if also clears) can avoid a tree
> walk if we don't shoot down the TLBs, like if we have to process a long
> stream of clears.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c  | 18 +++++++++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c | 10 +++++-----
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> index 8f8e9fdfb2a8..a76363740a12 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> @@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ struct dma_fence *xe_migrate_copy(struct xe_migrate *m,
>  			goto err;
>  		}
>  
> -		xe_sched_job_add_migrate_flush(job, flush_flags);
> +		xe_sched_job_add_migrate_flush(job, flush_flags | MI_INVALIDATE_TLB);
>  		if (!fence) {
>  			err = xe_sched_job_add_deps(job, src_bo->ttm.base.resv,
>  						    DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP);
> @@ -1119,11 +1119,13 @@ struct dma_fence *xe_migrate_clear(struct xe_migrate *m,
>  
>  		size -= clear_L0;
>  		/* Preemption is enabled again by the ring ops. */
> -		if (clear_vram && xe_migrate_allow_identity(clear_L0, &src_it))
> +		if (clear_vram && xe_migrate_allow_identity(clear_L0, &src_it)) {
>  			xe_res_next(&src_it, clear_L0);
> -		else
> -			emit_pte(m, bb, clear_L0_pt, clear_vram, clear_only_system_ccs,
> -				 &src_it, clear_L0, dst);
> +		} else {
> +			emit_pte(m, bb, clear_L0_pt, clear_vram,
> +				 clear_only_system_ccs, &src_it, clear_L0, dst);
> +			flush_flags |= MI_INVALIDATE_TLB;
> +		}

What about the if statements for dst_it / copy_system_ccs? Do we not
need to set MI_INVALIDATE_TLB there?

Matt

>  
>  		bb->cs[bb->len++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
>  		update_idx = bb->len;
> @@ -1134,7 +1136,7 @@ struct dma_fence *xe_migrate_clear(struct xe_migrate *m,
>  		if (xe_migrate_needs_ccs_emit(xe)) {
>  			emit_copy_ccs(gt, bb, clear_L0_ofs, true,
>  				      m->cleared_mem_ofs, false, clear_L0);
> -			flush_flags = MI_FLUSH_DW_CCS;
> +			flush_flags |= MI_FLUSH_DW_CCS;
>  		}
>  
>  		job = xe_bb_create_migration_job(m->q, bb,
> @@ -1469,6 +1471,8 @@ __xe_migrate_update_pgtables(struct xe_migrate *m,
>  		goto err_sa;
>  	}
>  
> +	xe_sched_job_add_migrate_flush(job, MI_INVALIDATE_TLB);
> +
>  	if (ops->pre_commit) {
>  		pt_update->job = job;
>  		err = ops->pre_commit(pt_update);
> @@ -1667,7 +1671,7 @@ static struct dma_fence *xe_migrate_vram(struct xe_migrate *m,
>  		goto err;
>  	}
>  
> -	xe_sched_job_add_migrate_flush(job, 0);
> +	xe_sched_job_add_migrate_flush(job, MI_INVALIDATE_TLB);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&m->job_mutex);
>  	xe_sched_job_arm(job);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
> index bc1689db4cd7..b5548e0769f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
> @@ -110,10 +110,10 @@ static int emit_bb_start(u64 batch_addr, u32 ppgtt_flag, u32 *dw, int i)
>  	return i;
>  }
>  
> -static int emit_flush_invalidate(u32 *dw, int i)
> +static int emit_flush_invalidate(u32 *dw, int i, u32 flush_flags)
>  {
> -	dw[i++] = MI_FLUSH_DW | MI_INVALIDATE_TLB | MI_FLUSH_DW_OP_STOREDW |
> -		  MI_FLUSH_IMM_DW | MI_FLUSH_DW_STORE_INDEX;
> +	dw[i++] = MI_FLUSH_DW |  MI_FLUSH_DW_OP_STOREDW | MI_FLUSH_IMM_DW |
> +		MI_FLUSH_DW_STORE_INDEX | (flush_flags & MI_INVALIDATE_TLB) ?: 0;
>  	dw[i++] = LRC_PPHWSP_FLUSH_INVAL_SCRATCH_ADDR;
>  	dw[i++] = 0;
>  	dw[i++] = 0;
> @@ -411,13 +411,13 @@ static void emit_migration_job_gen12(struct xe_sched_job *job,
>  	if (!IS_SRIOV_VF(gt_to_xe(job->q->gt))) {
>  		/* XXX: Do we need this? Leaving for now. */
>  		dw[i++] = preparser_disable(true);
> -		i = emit_flush_invalidate(dw, i);
> +		i = emit_flush_invalidate(dw, i, job->migrate_flush_flags);
>  		dw[i++] = preparser_disable(false);
>  	}
>  
>  	i = emit_bb_start(job->ptrs[1].batch_addr, BIT(8), dw, i);
>  
> -	dw[i++] = MI_FLUSH_DW | MI_INVALIDATE_TLB | job->migrate_flush_flags |
> +	dw[i++] = MI_FLUSH_DW | job->migrate_flush_flags |
>  		MI_FLUSH_DW_OP_STOREDW | MI_FLUSH_IMM_DW;
>  	dw[i++] = xe_lrc_seqno_ggtt_addr(lrc) | MI_FLUSH_DW_USE_GTT;
>  	dw[i++] = 0;
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-20 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-20 15:24 [PATCH] drm/xe/migrate: make MI_TLB_INVALIDATE conditional Matthew Auld
2025-06-20 15:31 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2025-06-20 16:11 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2025-06-23  9:33   ` [PATCH] " Matthew Auld
2025-06-23 11:24     ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-23 21:48       ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-24  9:11         ` Matthew Auld
2025-06-21  1:48 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: success for " Patchwork
2025-06-24  7:48 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/migrate: make MI_TLB_INVALIDATE conditional (rev2) Patchwork
2025-06-24  8:36 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-06-24 13:23 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-06-25 14:44 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/migrate: make MI_TLB_INVALIDATE conditional (rev3) Patchwork
2025-06-25 15:23 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-06-26 13:50 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aFWIS3/rlAWSlF6K@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox