Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	<rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/xe: Move Wa_15015404425 to use the new EX_DEVICE_WA macro
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:08:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFxXWMZfp-_KpmoS@msatwood-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250625195716.GG4868@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 12:57:16PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 12:33:38PM -0700, Matt Atwood wrote:
> > Move Wa_15015404425 to use the new implemented OOB macro XE_DEVICE_WA()
> > 
> > v2: rename from SoC to Device
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_wa_oob.rules |  1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c              | 10 +++++-----
> >  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_wa_oob.rules b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_wa_oob.rules
> > index e69de29bb2d1..b7d12ea4d65c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_wa_oob.rules
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_wa_oob.rules
> > @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> > +15015404425     PLATFORM(LUNARLAKE)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
> > index 7357458bc0d2..4990b3a47afd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
> > @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@
> >  #include "xe_macros.h"
> >  #include "xe_sriov.h"
> >  #include "xe_trace.h"
> > +#include "xe_wa.h"
> > +
> > +#include "generated/xe_soc_wa_oob.h"
> 
> Isn't this the wrong header name?
Yes
> 
> >  
> >  static void tiles_fini(void *arg)
> >  {
> > @@ -163,9 +166,6 @@ static void mmio_flush_pending_writes(struct xe_mmio *mmio)
> >  #define DUMMY_REG_OFFSET	0x130030
> >  	int i;
> >  
> > -	if (mmio->tile->xe->info.platform != XE_LUNARLAKE)
> > -		return;
> > -
> >  	/* 4 dummy writes */
> >  	for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> >  		writel(0, mmio->regs + DUMMY_REG_OFFSET);
> > @@ -176,8 +176,8 @@ u8 xe_mmio_read8(struct xe_mmio *mmio, struct xe_reg reg)
> >  	u32 addr = xe_mmio_adjusted_addr(mmio, reg.addr);
> >  	u8 val;
> >  
> > -	/* Wa_15015404425 */
> > -	mmio_flush_pending_writes(mmio);
> > +	if (XE_DEVICE_WA(mmio->tile->xe, 15015404425))
> > +		mmio_flush_pending_writes(mmio);
> 
> Moving the check out of the function to the callsite seems fine to me,
> but we need to do it at all the callsites, not just read8.
> 
> Also, you have a typo in the patch subject line (s/EX/XE/).
> 
> 
> Matt
> 
> >  
> >  	val = readb(mmio->regs + addr);
> >  	trace_xe_reg_rw(mmio, false, addr, val, sizeof(val));
> > -- 
> > 2.49.0
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Matt Roper
> Graphics Software Engineer
> Linux GPU Platform Enablement
> Intel Corporation

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-25 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-25 19:33 [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/xe: Create and use XE_DEVICE_WA infrastructure Matt Atwood
2025-06-25 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/xe: add xe_device_wa infrastructure Matt Atwood
2025-06-25 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/xe: Add infrastructure for Device OOB workarounds Matt Atwood
2025-06-25 19:51   ` Matt Roper
2025-06-25 20:39     ` Matt Roper
2025-06-25 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/xe: Move Wa_15015404425 to use the new EX_DEVICE_WA macro Matt Atwood
2025-06-25 19:57   ` Matt Roper
2025-06-25 20:08     ` Matt Atwood [this message]
2025-06-25 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] drm/xe: extend Wa_15015404425 to apply to PTL Matt Atwood
2025-06-25 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/xe: disable wa_15015404425 for PTL B0 Matt Atwood
2025-06-25 20:33   ` Matt Roper
2025-06-25 19:39 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Create and use XE_DEVICE_WA infrastructure (rev2) Patchwork
2025-06-25 19:39 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aFxXWMZfp-_KpmoS@msatwood-mobl \
    --to=matthew.s.atwood@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox