Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Lukasz Laguna <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
	<matthew.brost@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] drm/xe: Don't update wedged mode in case of an error
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 18:15:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJKCfFvucbl-7lKN@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250731123756.29259-3-lukasz.laguna@intel.com>

On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 02:37:54PM +0200, Lukasz Laguna wrote:
> Change driver's internal wedged.mode state only in case of a success and
> update GuC's reset policy only when it's necessary.
> 
> Fixes: 6b8ef44cc0a9 ("drm/xe: Introduce the wedged_mode debugfs")
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Laguna <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>
> ---
> v7: Don't introduce XE_WEDGED_MODE_MISCONFIGURED enum field (Michal)
>     Add needs_policy_update helper (Michal)
>     Rename wedged_mode_set_reset_policy to set_reset_policy (Lukasz)
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c      | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h |  2 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c      | 12 ++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.h      |  4 +-
>  4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
> index 16b2e306559a..8aff93401eb9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
> @@ -251,14 +251,64 @@ static ssize_t wedged_mode_show(struct file *f, char __user *ubuf,
>  	return simple_read_from_buffer(ubuf, size, pos, buf, len);
>  }
>  
> +static int __set_reset_policy(struct xe_gt *gt, enum xe_wedged_mode mode)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = xe_guc_ads_scheduler_policy_toggle_reset(&gt->uc.guc.ads,
> +						       !(mode == XE_WEDGED_MODE_UPON_ANY_HANG));

mode != XE_WEDGED_MODE_UPON_ANY_HANG please

> +	if (ret)
> +		xe_gt_err(gt, "Failed to update GuC ADS scheduler policy (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int set_reset_policy(struct xe_device *xe, enum xe_wedged_mode mode)
> +{
> +	struct xe_gt *gt;
> +	int ret;
> +	u8 id;
> +
> +	xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> +	for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
> +		ret = __set_reset_policy(gt, mode);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			if (id > 0) {
> +				xe->wedged.inconsistent_reset = true;
> +				drm_err(&xe->drm, "Inconsistent reset policy state between GTs\n");
> +			}
> +
> +			xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +			return ret;

Why to return on the first GT? perhaps we should continue and just leave one
behind?
perhaps we should have a 3 times retry attempt logic before giving up?
perhaps both combined?

> +		}
> +	}
> +	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +
> +	xe->wedged.inconsistent_reset = false;

then move this to the beginning of the function
also ret = 0; up there

> +
> +	return 0;

and simply return ret; here

> +}
> +
> +static bool needs_policy_update(struct xe_device *xe, enum xe_wedged_mode mode)
> +{
> +	if (xe->wedged.inconsistent_reset)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	if (xe->wedged.mode == mode)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return !((xe->wedged.mode == XE_WEDGED_MODE_NEVER &&
> +		  mode == XE_WEDGED_MODE_UPON_CRITICAL_ERROR) ||
> +		 (xe->wedged.mode == XE_WEDGED_MODE_UPON_CRITICAL_ERROR &&
> +		  mode == XE_WEDGED_MODE_NEVER));

This is worst then the one above... please expand this to inside
the function instead of this overloaded return full of not-or-and logic.

Some wording about what cases are this in the commit message should be very
helpful

> +}
> +
>  static ssize_t wedged_mode_set(struct file *f, const char __user *ubuf,
>  			       size_t size, loff_t *pos)
>  {
>  	struct xe_device *xe = file_inode(f)->i_private;
> -	struct xe_gt *gt;
>  	u32 wedged_mode;
>  	ssize_t ret;
> -	u8 id;
>  
>  	ret = kstrtouint_from_user(ubuf, size, 0, &wedged_mode);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -268,22 +318,14 @@ static ssize_t wedged_mode_set(struct file *f, const char __user *ubuf,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	if (xe->wedged.mode == wedged_mode)
> -		return size;
> +	if (needs_policy_update(xe, wedged_mode)) {
> +		ret = set_reset_policy(xe, wedged_mode);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
>  
>  	xe->wedged.mode = wedged_mode;
>  
> -	xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> -	for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
> -		ret = xe_guc_ads_scheduler_policy_toggle_reset(&gt->uc.guc.ads);
> -		if (ret) {
> -			xe_gt_err(gt, "Failed to update GuC ADS scheduler policy. GuC may still cause engine reset even with wedged_mode=2\n");
> -			xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> -			return -EIO;
> -		}
> -	}
> -	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> -
>  	return size;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> index 1e496845c91f..829252db3a47 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> @@ -546,6 +546,8 @@ struct xe_device {
>  			XE_WEDGED_MODE_UPON_ANY_HANG = 2,
>  			XE_WEDGED_MODE_DEFAULT = XE_WEDGED_MODE_UPON_CRITICAL_ERROR,
>  		} mode;
> +		/** @wedged.inconsistent_reset: Inconsistent reset policy state between GTs */
> +		bool inconsistent_reset;
>  	} wedged;
>  
>  	/** @bo_device: Struct to control async free of BOs */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
> index c4ea4e6d82ce..7f58d77e0ab9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
> @@ -1033,16 +1033,16 @@ static int guc_ads_action_update_policies(struct xe_guc_ads *ads, u32 policy_off
>  /**
>   * xe_guc_ads_scheduler_policy_toggle_reset - Toggle reset policy
>   * @ads: Additional data structures object
> + * @enable: true to enable engine resets, false otherwise
>   *
> - * This function update the GuC's engine reset policy based on wedged.mode.
> + * This function update the GuC's engine reset policy.
>   *
>   * Return: 0 on success, and negative error code otherwise.
>   */
> -int xe_guc_ads_scheduler_policy_toggle_reset(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
> +int xe_guc_ads_scheduler_policy_toggle_reset(struct xe_guc_ads *ads, bool enable)
>  {
>  	struct guc_policies *policies;
>  	struct xe_guc *guc = ads_to_guc(ads);
> -	struct xe_device *xe = ads_to_xe(ads);
>  	CLASS(xe_guc_buf, buf)(&guc->buf, sizeof(*policies));
>  
>  	if (!xe_guc_buf_is_valid(buf))
> @@ -1054,10 +1054,10 @@ int xe_guc_ads_scheduler_policy_toggle_reset(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
>  	policies->dpc_promote_time = ads_blob_read(ads, policies.dpc_promote_time);
>  	policies->max_num_work_items = ads_blob_read(ads, policies.max_num_work_items);
>  	policies->is_valid = 1;
> -	if (xe->wedged.mode == XE_WEDGED_MODE_UPON_ANY_HANG)
> -		policies->global_flags |= GLOBAL_POLICY_DISABLE_ENGINE_RESET;
> -	else
> +	if (enable)
>  		policies->global_flags &= ~GLOBAL_POLICY_DISABLE_ENGINE_RESET;
> +	else
> +		policies->global_flags |= GLOBAL_POLICY_DISABLE_ENGINE_RESET;
>  
>  	return guc_ads_action_update_policies(ads, xe_guc_buf_flush(buf));
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.h
> index 2e6674c760ff..9879aadd22d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
>  #ifndef _XE_GUC_ADS_H_
>  #define _XE_GUC_ADS_H_
>  
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
>  struct xe_guc_ads;
>  
>  int xe_guc_ads_init(struct xe_guc_ads *ads);
> @@ -13,6 +15,6 @@ int xe_guc_ads_init_post_hwconfig(struct xe_guc_ads *ads);
>  void xe_guc_ads_populate(struct xe_guc_ads *ads);
>  void xe_guc_ads_populate_minimal(struct xe_guc_ads *ads);
>  void xe_guc_ads_populate_post_load(struct xe_guc_ads *ads);
> -int xe_guc_ads_scheduler_policy_toggle_reset(struct xe_guc_ads *ads);
> +int xe_guc_ads_scheduler_policy_toggle_reset(struct xe_guc_ads *ads, bool enable);
>  
>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.40.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-05 22:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-31 12:37 [PATCH v8 0/4] drm/xe: Improve wedged mode handling Lukasz Laguna
2025-07-31 12:37 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] drm/xe: Validate wedged_mode parameter and define enum for modes Lukasz Laguna
2025-07-31 12:37 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] drm/xe: Don't update wedged mode in case of an error Lukasz Laguna
2025-08-05 22:15   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-08-06  8:37     ` Laguna, Lukasz
2025-08-06  9:42       ` Laguna, Lukasz
2025-07-31 12:37 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] drm/xe/vf: Disallow setting wedged mode to upon-any-hang Lukasz Laguna
2025-07-31 12:37 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] drm/xe/pf: Allow upon-any-hang wedged mode only in debug config Lukasz Laguna
2025-07-31 16:55 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Improve wedged mode handling (rev8) Patchwork
2025-07-31 18:20 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-07-31 20:20 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aJKCfFvucbl-7lKN@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lukasz.laguna@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox