From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/sysfs: Simplify and fix sysfs registration
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 18:03:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMg4xRh3VuI9MORl@black.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25c43237-e102-45aa-8e3b-63f7891d38fd@intel.com>
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 05:51:33PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> On 9/15/2025 5:17 PM, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 04:06:13PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> > > Instead of manually maintaining each sysfs attribute define and use
> > > attribute groups and register them using device managed function.
> > > Then use is_visible() to filter-out unsupported attributes.
> > >
> > > This will result not only in less code and smaller footprint:
> > >
> > > Function old new delta
> > > late_bind_attr_is_visible - 183 +183
> > > ____versions 80832 80896 +64
> > > vram_attr_group - 48 +48
> > > late_bind_attr_group - 48 +48
> > > auto_link_downgrade_attr_group - 48 +48
> > > late_bind_attrs - 24 +24
> > > vram_attrs - 16 +16
> > > __pfx_late_bind_attr_is_visible - 16 +16
> > > xe_device_sysfs_init.cold 20 21 +1
> > > __pfx_xe_device_sysfs_fini 16 - -16
> > > xe_device_sysfs_fini.cold 21 - -21
> > > xe_device_sysfs_fini 271 - -271
> > > xe_device_sysfs_init 421 135 -286
> > > Total: Before=2848898, After=2848752, chg -0.01%
> >
> > I find the summary to be sufficient but upto you.
>
> sure, can strip this (if there will be v2)
Thanks.
> > > but will also fix some bad error handling that we had here.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 0e414bf7ad01 ("drm/xe: Expose PCIe link downgrade attributes")
> > > Fixes: cdc36b66cd41 ("drm/xe: Expose fan control and voltage regulator version")
> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c | 96 +++++++++++-----------------
> > > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c
> > > index 6ee422594b56..5b0b98ac9b17 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c
> > > @@ -71,6 +71,15 @@ vram_d3cold_threshold_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> > >
> > > static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(vram_d3cold_threshold);
> > >
> > > +static struct attribute *vram_attrs[] = {
> > > + &dev_attr_vram_d3cold_threshold.attr,
> > > + NULL
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct attribute_group vram_attr_group = {
> > > + .attrs = vram_attrs,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > static ssize_t
> > > lb_fan_control_version_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > > {
> > > @@ -149,8 +158,16 @@ lb_voltage_regulator_version_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *a
> > > }
> > > static DEVICE_ATTR_ADMIN_RO(lb_voltage_regulator_version);
> > >
> > > -static int late_bind_create_files(struct device *dev)
> > > +static struct attribute *late_bind_attrs[] = {
> > > + &dev_attr_lb_fan_control_version.attr,
> > > + &dev_attr_lb_voltage_regulator_version.attr,
> > > + NULL
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static umode_t late_bind_attr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> > > + struct attribute *attr, int n)
> > > {
> > > + struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
> > > struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(to_pci_dev(dev));
> > > struct xe_tile *root = xe_device_get_root_tile(xe);
> > > u32 cap = 0;
> > > @@ -160,51 +177,25 @@ static int late_bind_create_files(struct device *dev)
> > >
> > > ret = xe_pcode_read(root, PCODE_MBOX(PCODE_LATE_BINDING, GET_CAPABILITY_STATUS, 0),
> > > &cap, NULL);
> > > - if (ret) {
> > > - if (ret == -ENXIO) {
> > > - drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "Late binding not supported by firmware\n");
> > > - ret = 0;
> > > - }
> > > - goto out;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - if (REG_FIELD_GET(V1_FAN_SUPPORTED, cap)) {
> > > - ret = sysfs_create_file(&dev->kobj, &dev_attr_lb_fan_control_version.attr);
> > > - if (ret)
> > > - goto out;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - if (REG_FIELD_GET(VR_PARAMS_SUPPORTED, cap))
> > > - ret = sysfs_create_file(&dev->kobj, &dev_attr_lb_voltage_regulator_version.attr);
> > > -out:
> > > xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> > > -
> > > - return ret;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -static void late_bind_remove_files(struct device *dev)
> > > -{
> > > - struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(to_pci_dev(dev));
> > > - struct xe_tile *root = xe_device_get_root_tile(xe);
> > > - u32 cap = 0;
> > > - int ret;
> > > -
> > > - xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> > > -
> > > - ret = xe_pcode_read(root, PCODE_MBOX(PCODE_LATE_BINDING, GET_CAPABILITY_STATUS, 0),
> > > - &cap, NULL);
> > > if (ret)
> > > - goto out;
> > > + return 0;
> >
> > Should we keep the original log so we don't have to guesswork our way around
> > random pcode errors?
>
> hmm, I was assuming that PCODE_LATE_BINDING is also used elsewhere
> so it will be reported, but it looks that it's not
>
> but OTOH, is it a right place (sysfs init, or now is_visible)
> to report any missing firmware cap?
>
> maybe there should be xe_lb_init() somewhere, where we can report any
> unexpected problems, and then in xe_sysfs_init() we will just use
> already retrieved and confirmed cap?
The idea was to land the sysfs along with [1] but it still seems going
through its own hoops due to cross subsys dependency.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/intel-xe/20250905154953.3974335-1-badal.nilawar@intel.com/
Raag
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-15 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-15 14:06 [PATCH 0/2] drm/xe/sysfs: Fix attributes registration on VFs Michal Wajdeczko
2025-09-15 14:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/sysfs: Simplify and fix sysfs registration Michal Wajdeczko
2025-09-15 15:12 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-09-15 15:33 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-09-16 13:52 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-09-16 14:56 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-09-15 15:17 ` Raag Jadav
2025-09-15 15:51 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-09-15 16:03 ` Raag Jadav [this message]
2025-09-15 14:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/vf: Don't expose sysfs attributes not applicable for VFs Michal Wajdeczko
2025-09-15 15:18 ` Raag Jadav
2025-09-15 14:12 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/sysfs: Fix attributes registration on VFs Patchwork
2025-09-15 14:51 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-09-15 17:44 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aMg4xRh3VuI9MORl@black.igk.intel.com \
--to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox