intel-xe.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/dsb: s/intel_dsb_wait_vblank_delay/intel_dsb_wait_for_delayed_vblank
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 20:21:39 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNLXI72gSAn9vv4p@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250923131043.2628282-7-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 06:40:40PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> The helper intel_dsb_wait_vblank_delay() is used in DSB to wait for the
> delayed vblank after the send push operation. Rename it to
> intel_dsb_wait_for_delayed_vblank() to align with the semantics.
> 
> v2: Rename to intel_dsb_wait_vblank_delay instead of the proposed SCL
> semantics, as this will be ot only about SCL lines with different timing
> generator and different refresh rate modes. (Ville)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c   | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c     | 4 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h     | 4 ++--
>  4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> index 671db6926e4c..51db70d07fae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> @@ -2013,7 +2013,7 @@ void intel_color_prepare_commit(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  
>  	if (crtc_state->use_dsb && intel_color_uses_chained_dsb(crtc_state)) {
>  		intel_vrr_send_push(crtc_state->dsb_color, crtc_state);
> -		intel_dsb_wait_vblank_delay(state, crtc_state->dsb_color);
> +		intel_dsb_wait_for_delayed_vblank(state, crtc_state->dsb_color);
>  		intel_vrr_check_push_sent(crtc_state->dsb_color, crtc_state);
>  		intel_dsb_interrupt(crtc_state->dsb_color);
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index aceafe4478d9..445400ed6592 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -7268,7 +7268,7 @@ static void intel_atomic_dsb_finish(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  		intel_dsb_wait_vblanks(new_crtc_state->dsb_commit, 1);
>  
>  		intel_vrr_send_push(new_crtc_state->dsb_commit, new_crtc_state);
> -		intel_dsb_wait_vblank_delay(state, new_crtc_state->dsb_commit);
> +		intel_dsb_wait_for_delayed_vblank(state, new_crtc_state->dsb_commit);
>  		intel_vrr_check_push_sent(new_crtc_state->dsb_commit,
>  					  new_crtc_state);
>  		intel_dsb_interrupt(new_crtc_state->dsb_commit);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> index ca31e928ecb0..0584a9597327 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> @@ -815,8 +815,8 @@ void intel_dsb_chain(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  			 wait_for_vblank ? DSB_WAIT_FOR_VBLANK : 0);
>  }
>  
> -void intel_dsb_wait_vblank_delay(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> -				 struct intel_dsb *dsb)
> +void intel_dsb_wait_for_delayed_vblank(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> +				       struct intel_dsb *dsb)
>  {
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = dsb->crtc;
>  	const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
> index c8f4499916eb..2f31f2c1d0c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
> @@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ void intel_dsb_nonpost_end(struct intel_dsb *dsb);
>  void intel_dsb_interrupt(struct intel_dsb *dsb);
>  void intel_dsb_wait_usec(struct intel_dsb *dsb, int count);
>  void intel_dsb_wait_vblanks(struct intel_dsb *dsb, int count);
> -void intel_dsb_wait_vblank_delay(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> -				 struct intel_dsb *dsb);
> +void intel_dsb_wait_for_delayed_vblank(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> +				       struct intel_dsb *dsb);
>  void intel_dsb_wait_scanline_in(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  				struct intel_dsb *dsb,
>  				int lower, int upper);
> -- 
> 2.45.2

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-23 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-23 13:10 [PATCH 0/9] Introduce set_context_latency and refactor VRR/DSB timing logic Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-23 13:10 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915/psr: s/intel_psr_min_vblank_delay/intel_psr_min_set_context_latency Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-23 13:10 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/display: Add set_context_latency to crtc_state Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-23 14:11   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-23 13:10 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/vrr: Use set_context_latency instead of intel_vrr_real_vblank_delay() Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-23 13:10 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/vrr: Use SCL for computing guardband Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-23 14:12   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-23 13:10 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/vrr: s/intel_vrr_vblank_delay/intel_vrr_scl_delay Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-23 14:13   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-24  9:33     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-09-24  9:49       ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-23 13:10 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/dsb: s/intel_dsb_wait_vblank_delay/intel_dsb_wait_for_delayed_vblank Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-23 17:21   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2025-09-23 13:10 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/display: Wait for scl start instead of dsb_wait_vblanks Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-23 14:32   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-23 13:10 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/reg_defs: Add REG_FIELD_MAX wrapper for FIELD_MAX() Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-23 17:27   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-23 13:10 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/vrr: Clamp guardband as per hardware and timing constraints Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-23 17:25   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-23 13:32 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Introduce set_context_latency and refactor VRR/DSB timing logic (rev2) Patchwork
2025-09-23 13:47 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-09-23 14:16 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-09-23 15:48 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aNLXI72gSAn9vv4p@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).