From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/display: Drop intel_vrr_vblank_delay and use set_context_latency
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 15:13:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNPgWeXReSa7ZRQd@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250924105129.2771196-10-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 04:21:29PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> The helper intel_vrr_vblank_delay() was used to keep track of the SCL
> lines + the extra vblank delay required for ICL/TGL.
> This was used to wait for sufficient lines for:
> -push send bit to clear for VRR case
> -evasion to delay the commit.
>
> For first case we are using safe window scanline wait and with that we
> just need to wait for SCL lines, we do not need to wait for the extra
> vblank delay required for ICL/TGL. For the second case, we actually
> do not need to wait for extra lines before the undelayed vblank, if we
> are already in the safe window.
>
> To sum up, SCL lines is sufficient for both cases.
>
> So drop the helper intel_vrr_vblank_delay and just use
> crtc_state->set_context_latency instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c | 8 --------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.h | 1 -
> 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> index 3cb4c9be146f..c183209d7663 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int dsb_vblank_delay(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> * scanline until the delayed vblank occurs after
> * TRANS_PUSH has been written.
> */
> - return intel_vrr_vblank_delay(crtc_state) + 1;
> + return crtc_state->set_context_latency + 1;
> else
> return intel_mode_vblank_delay(&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode);
> }
> @@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ void intel_dsb_vblank_evade(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> intel_dsb_emit_wait_dsl(dsb, DSB_OPCODE_WAIT_DSL_OUT, 0, 0);
>
> if (pre_commit_is_vrr_active(state, crtc)) {
> - int vblank_delay = intel_vrr_vblank_delay(crtc_state);
> + int vblank_delay = crtc_state->set_context_latency;
>
> end = intel_vrr_vmin_vblank_start(crtc_state);
> start = end - vblank_delay - latency;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
> index c15234c1d96e..0b7fcc05e64c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
> @@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ void intel_vblank_evade_init(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> else
> evade->vblank_start = intel_vrr_vmax_vblank_start(crtc_state);
>
> - vblank_delay = intel_vrr_vblank_delay(crtc_state);
> + vblank_delay = crtc_state->set_context_latency;
> } else {
> evade->vblank_start = intel_mode_vblank_start(adjusted_mode);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
> index e29b4050a9df..6d3f9e3de1f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
> @@ -92,14 +92,6 @@ static int intel_vrr_extra_vblank_delay(struct intel_display *display)
> return DISPLAY_VER(display) < 13 ? 1 : 0;
> }
>
> -int intel_vrr_vblank_delay(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> -{
> - struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> -
> - return crtc_state->set_context_latency +
> - intel_vrr_extra_vblank_delay(display);
> -}
> -
> static int intel_vrr_vmin_flipline_offset(struct intel_display *display)
> {
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.h
> index 239e4f94725c..cfd027118b60 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.h
> @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ int intel_vrr_vmax_vtotal(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> int intel_vrr_vmin_vtotal(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> int intel_vrr_vmax_vblank_start(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> int intel_vrr_vmin_vblank_start(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> -int intel_vrr_vblank_delay(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> bool intel_vrr_is_fixed_rr(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> void intel_vrr_transcoder_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> void intel_vrr_transcoder_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> --
> 2.45.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-24 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 10:51 [PATCH 0/9] Introduce set_context_latency and refactor VRR/DSB timing logic Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-24 10:51 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915/psr: s/intel_psr_min_vblank_delay/intel_psr_min_set_context_latency Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-24 10:51 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/display: Add set_context_latency to crtc_state Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-24 10:51 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/vrr: Use set_context_latency instead of intel_vrr_real_vblank_delay() Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-24 10:51 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/vrr: Use SCL for computing guardband Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-24 10:51 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/dsb: s/intel_dsb_wait_vblank_delay/intel_dsb_wait_for_delayed_vblank Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-24 10:51 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/display: Wait for scl start instead of dsb_wait_vblanks Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-24 12:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-24 14:04 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-09-24 10:51 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/reg_defs: Add REG_FIELD_MAX wrapper for FIELD_MAX() Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-24 12:24 ` Andi Shyti
2025-09-24 14:17 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-09-24 10:51 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/vrr: Clamp guardband as per hardware and timing constraints Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-24 12:04 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-24 14:19 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-09-24 10:51 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/display: Drop intel_vrr_vblank_delay and use set_context_latency Ankit Nautiyal
2025-09-24 12:13 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2025-09-24 11:35 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Introduce set_context_latency and refactor VRR/DSB timing logic (rev3) Patchwork
2025-09-24 11:50 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-09-24 12:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-09-24 15:02 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aNPgWeXReSa7ZRQd@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).