Re: [PATCH v3 02/36] drm/xe/vf: Lock querying GGTT config during driver init

[Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>]

On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 09:42:55AM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/29/2025 4:55 AM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > From: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
> > 
> > Protect access to GGTT config as this is non-static information.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c       | 96 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h |  3 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c          |  6 ++
> >  3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c
> > index 0461d5513487..016c867e5e2b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c
> > @@ -440,18 +440,21 @@ static int vf_get_ggtt_info(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >  
> >  	xe_gt_assert(gt, IS_SRIOV_VF(gt_to_xe(gt)));
> >  
> > +	down_write(&config->lock);
> > +
> 
> still didn't get answer to my earlier question [1]
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/676375/?series=154627&rev=2#comment_1240924
> 

Again, this isn't a patch, so I believe Tomasz will need to chime in to
provide an answer or conclusion here.

> >  	err = guc_action_query_single_klv64(guc, GUC_KLV_VF_CFG_GGTT_START_KEY, &start);
> >  	if (unlikely(err))
> > -		return err;
> > +		goto out;
> >  
> >  	err = guc_action_query_single_klv64(guc, GUC_KLV_VF_CFG_GGTT_SIZE_KEY, &size);
> >  	if (unlikely(err))
> > -		return err;
> > +		goto out;
> >  
> >  	if (config->ggtt_size && config->ggtt_size != size) {
> >  		xe_gt_sriov_err(gt, "Unexpected GGTT reassignment: %lluK != %lluK\n",
> >  				size / SZ_1K, config->ggtt_size / SZ_1K);
> > -		return -EREMCHG;
> > +		err = -EREMCHG;
> > +		goto out;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	xe_gt_sriov_dbg_verbose(gt, "GGTT %#llx-%#llx = %lluK\n",
> > @@ -460,8 +463,11 @@ static int vf_get_ggtt_info(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >  	config->ggtt_shift = start - (s64)config->ggtt_base;
> >  	config->ggtt_base = start;
> >  	config->ggtt_size = size;
> > +	err = config->ggtt_size ? 0 : -ENODATA;
> >  
> > -	return config->ggtt_size ? 0 : -ENODATA;
> > +out:
> > +	up_write(&config->lock);
> > +	return err;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int vf_get_lmem_info(struct xe_gt *gt)
> > @@ -474,22 +480,28 @@ static int vf_get_lmem_info(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >  
> >  	xe_gt_assert(gt, IS_SRIOV_VF(gt_to_xe(gt)));
> >  
> > +	down_write(&config->lock);
> > +
> 
> also, commit message says "Protect access to GGTT config "
> while the patch seems to apply locking to the whole config ...
> 
> what's the rationale to extend this protection?
> just unification?
> 
> >  	err = guc_action_query_single_klv64(guc, GUC_KLV_VF_CFG_LMEM_SIZE_KEY, &size);
> >  	if (unlikely(err))
> > -		return err;
> > +		goto out;
> >  
> >  	if (config->lmem_size && config->lmem_size != size) {
> >  		xe_gt_sriov_err(gt, "Unexpected LMEM reassignment: %lluM != %lluM\n",
> >  				size / SZ_1M, config->lmem_size / SZ_1M);
> > -		return -EREMCHG;
> > +		err = -EREMCHG;
> > +		goto out;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	string_get_size(size, 1, STRING_UNITS_2, size_str, sizeof(size_str));
> >  	xe_gt_sriov_dbg_verbose(gt, "LMEM %lluM %s\n", size / SZ_1M, size_str);
> >  
> >  	config->lmem_size = size;
> > +	err = config->lmem_size ? 0 : -ENODATA;
> >  
> > -	return config->lmem_size ? 0 : -ENODATA;
> > +out:
> > +	up_write(&config->lock);
> > +	return err;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int vf_get_submission_cfg(struct xe_gt *gt)
> > @@ -501,23 +513,27 @@ static int vf_get_submission_cfg(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >  
> >  	xe_gt_assert(gt, IS_SRIOV_VF(gt_to_xe(gt)));
> >  
> > +	down_write(&config->lock);
> > +
> >  	err = guc_action_query_single_klv32(guc, GUC_KLV_VF_CFG_NUM_CONTEXTS_KEY, &num_ctxs);
> >  	if (unlikely(err))
> > -		return err;
> > +		goto out;
> >  
> >  	err = guc_action_query_single_klv32(guc, GUC_KLV_VF_CFG_NUM_DOORBELLS_KEY, &num_dbs);
> >  	if (unlikely(err))
> > -		return err;
> > +		goto out;
> >  
> >  	if (config->num_ctxs && config->num_ctxs != num_ctxs) {
> >  		xe_gt_sriov_err(gt, "Unexpected CTXs reassignment: %u != %u\n",
> >  				num_ctxs, config->num_ctxs);
> > -		return -EREMCHG;
> > +		err = -EREMCHG;
> > +		goto out;
> >  	}
> >  	if (config->num_dbs && config->num_dbs != num_dbs) {
> >  		xe_gt_sriov_err(gt, "Unexpected DBs reassignment: %u != %u\n",
> >  				num_dbs, config->num_dbs);
> > -		return -EREMCHG;
> > +		err = -EREMCHG;
> > +		goto out;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	xe_gt_sriov_dbg_verbose(gt, "CTXs %u DBs %u\n", num_ctxs, num_dbs);
> > @@ -525,7 +541,11 @@ static int vf_get_submission_cfg(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >  	config->num_ctxs = num_ctxs;
> >  	config->num_dbs = num_dbs;
> >  
> > -	return config->num_ctxs ? 0 : -ENODATA;
> > +	err = config->num_ctxs ? 0 : -ENODATA;
> > +
> > +out:
> > +	up_write(&config->lock);
> > +	return err;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void vf_cache_gmdid(struct xe_gt *gt)
> > @@ -579,11 +599,18 @@ int xe_gt_sriov_vf_query_config(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >   */
> >  u16 xe_gt_sriov_vf_guc_ids(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >  {
> > +	struct xe_gt_sriov_vf_selfconfig *config = &gt->sriov.vf.self_config;
> > +	u16 val;
> > +
> >  	xe_gt_assert(gt, IS_SRIOV_VF(gt_to_xe(gt)));
> >  	xe_gt_assert(gt, gt->sriov.vf.guc_version.major);
> > -	xe_gt_assert(gt, gt->sriov.vf.self_config.num_ctxs);
> >  
> > -	return gt->sriov.vf.self_config.num_ctxs;
> > +	down_read(&config->lock);
> > +	xe_gt_assert(gt, config->num_ctxs);
> > +	val = config->num_ctxs;
> > +	up_read(&config->lock);
> > +
> > +	return val;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -596,11 +623,18 @@ u16 xe_gt_sriov_vf_guc_ids(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >   */
> >  u64 xe_gt_sriov_vf_lmem(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >  {
> > +	struct xe_gt_sriov_vf_selfconfig *config = &gt->sriov.vf.self_config;
> > +	u64 val;
> > +
> >  	xe_gt_assert(gt, IS_SRIOV_VF(gt_to_xe(gt)));
> >  	xe_gt_assert(gt, gt->sriov.vf.guc_version.major);
> > -	xe_gt_assert(gt, gt->sriov.vf.self_config.lmem_size);
> >  
> > -	return gt->sriov.vf.self_config.lmem_size;
> > +	down_read(&config->lock);
> > +	xe_gt_assert(gt, config->lmem_size);
> > +	val = config->lmem_size;
> > +	up_read(&config->lock);
> > +
> > +	return val;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -613,11 +647,17 @@ u64 xe_gt_sriov_vf_lmem(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >   */
> >  u64 xe_gt_sriov_vf_ggtt(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >  {
> > +	struct xe_gt_sriov_vf_selfconfig *config = &gt->sriov.vf.self_config;
> > +	u64 val;
> > +
> >  	xe_gt_assert(gt, IS_SRIOV_VF(gt_to_xe(gt)));
> >  	xe_gt_assert(gt, gt->sriov.vf.guc_version.major);
> > -	xe_gt_assert(gt, gt->sriov.vf.self_config.ggtt_size);
> >  
> > -	return gt->sriov.vf.self_config.ggtt_size;
> > +	down_read(&config->lock);
> > +	val = config->ggtt_size;
> > +	up_read(&config->lock);
> > +
> > +	return val;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -630,11 +670,18 @@ u64 xe_gt_sriov_vf_ggtt(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >   */
> >  u64 xe_gt_sriov_vf_ggtt_base(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >  {
> > +	struct xe_gt_sriov_vf_selfconfig *config = &gt->sriov.vf.self_config;
> > +	u64 val;
> > +
> >  	xe_gt_assert(gt, IS_SRIOV_VF(gt_to_xe(gt)));
> >  	xe_gt_assert(gt, gt->sriov.vf.guc_version.major);
> > -	xe_gt_assert(gt, gt->sriov.vf.self_config.ggtt_size);
> >  
> > -	return gt->sriov.vf.self_config.ggtt_base;
> > +	down_read(&config->lock);
> > +	xe_gt_assert(gt, config->ggtt_size);
> > +	val = config->ggtt_base;
> > +	up_read(&config->lock);
> > +
> > +	return val;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -648,11 +695,16 @@ u64 xe_gt_sriov_vf_ggtt_base(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >  s64 xe_gt_sriov_vf_ggtt_shift(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >  {
> >  	struct xe_gt_sriov_vf_selfconfig *config = &gt->sriov.vf.self_config;
> > +	s64 val;
> >  
> >  	xe_gt_assert(gt, IS_SRIOV_VF(gt_to_xe(gt)));
> >  	xe_gt_assert(gt, xe_gt_is_main_type(gt));
> >  
> > -	return config->ggtt_shift;
> > +	down_read(&config->lock);
> > +	val = config->ggtt_shift;
> > +	up_read(&config->lock);
> > +
> > +	return val;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int relay_action_handshake(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 *major, u32 *minor)
> > @@ -1044,6 +1096,7 @@ void xe_gt_sriov_vf_print_config(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
> >  
> >  	xe_gt_assert(gt, IS_SRIOV_VF(gt_to_xe(gt)));
> >  
> > +	down_read(&config->lock);
> >  	drm_printf(p, "GGTT range:\t%#llx-%#llx\n",
> >  		   config->ggtt_base,
> >  		   config->ggtt_base + config->ggtt_size - 1);
> > @@ -1060,6 +1113,7 @@ void xe_gt_sriov_vf_print_config(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
> >  
> >  	drm_printf(p, "GuC contexts:\t%u\n", config->num_ctxs);
> >  	drm_printf(p, "GuC doorbells:\t%u\n", config->num_dbs);
> > +	up_read(&config->lock);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h
> > index 298dedf4b009..d95857bd789b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> >  #ifndef _XE_GT_SRIOV_VF_TYPES_H_
> >  #define _XE_GT_SRIOV_VF_TYPES_H_
> >  
> > +#include <linux/rwsem.h>
> >  #include <linux/types.h>
> >  #include "xe_uc_fw_types.h"
> >  
> > @@ -25,6 +26,8 @@ struct xe_gt_sriov_vf_selfconfig {
> >  	u16 num_ctxs;
> >  	/** @num_dbs: assigned number of GuC doorbells IDs. */
> >  	u16 num_dbs;
> > +	/** @lock: lock for protecting access to all selfconfig fields. */
> > +	struct rw_semaphore lock;
> >  };
> >  
> >  /**
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c
> > index cdd9f8e78b2a..d6e2ed9b9bbc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c
> > @@ -197,6 +197,12 @@ static void vf_migration_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
> >   */
> >  void xe_sriov_vf_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
> >  {
> > +	struct xe_gt *gt;
> > +	unsigned int id;
> > +
> > +	for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
> > +		init_rwsem(&gt->sriov.vf.self_config.lock);
> 
> as before, this should be done in
> 
> 	xe_gt_sriov_vf_init_early
> 

I pick up this change but again I think Michal's need some answers to
his questions.

Matt

> > +
> >  	vf_migration_init_early(xe);
> >  }
> >  
>