From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Fix a couple of wedge corner-case memory leaks
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 10:04:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aO0xDCa/rTPp9++8@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251013162504.7768-1-stuart.summers@intel.com>
On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 04:24:57PM +0000, Stuart Summers wrote:
> Most of the patches in this series are just adding
> some debug hints to help track these down. I split
> these up in case we want to pick and choose which ones
> to include in the tree. I found them useful.
>
> The main two interesting patches are the last two in the
> series which are fixing some corner cases when the
> driver becomes wedged in the middle of either communication
> with the DRM scheduler or in the event the GuC becomes
> unresponsive. In both of these cases there is a chance
> we could leak memory around the exec queue members
> like the LRC and the LRC BO. These patches fix those
> scenarios.
>
Ok, I think I see the problem. I believe the correct approach is:
- Apply [1]
- Ensure all schedulers are not stopped in guc_submit_wedged_fini
- Clean up any lost H2G in guc_submit_wedged_fini similar to a GT reset
- Wait on all async scheduler work queue opertaions complete somewhere
(this is part of VLK-80263, I was going to try to look at this part
sometime this week).
Matt
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/155417/
> v2: Address feedback from Matt:
> - Let the DRM scheduler handle pausing/unpausing
> - Still do the wait after scheduling disable/deregister
> as with the previous patch, but skip the intermediate
> software-based schedule disable using the "banned"
> flag and instead just jump straight to the deregister
> handling which will fully reset the queue state.
> Note that for this case I am seeing a hardware failure
> after submitting to GuC but before receiving the
> response from GuC. So even if we wedge in this case
> (monitoring the hardware state change), the queue
> itself is not wedged because of the active GuC
> submission (CT is not stalled at that point).
>
> Stuart Summers (7):
> drm/xe: Add additional trace points for LRCs
> drm/xe: Add a trace point for VM close
> drm/xe: Add the BO pointer info to the BO trace
> drm/xe: Add new exec queue trace points
> drm/xe: Correct migration VM teardown order
> drm/xe: Don't block messages to the GPU scheduler
> drm/xe: Check for GuC responses on disabling scheduling
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c | 4 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.c | 6 +---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 24 ++++++++++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c | 4 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h | 3 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h | 22 ++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace_bo.h | 12 ++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace_lrc.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 2 ++
> 10 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-13 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-13 16:24 [PATCH 0/7] Fix a couple of wedge corner-case memory leaks Stuart Summers
2025-10-13 16:24 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/xe: Add additional trace points for LRCs Stuart Summers
2025-10-13 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/xe: Add a trace point for VM close Stuart Summers
2025-10-13 16:25 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/xe: Add the BO pointer info to the BO trace Stuart Summers
2025-10-13 16:25 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/xe: Add new exec queue trace points Stuart Summers
2025-10-13 16:25 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/xe: Correct migration VM teardown order Stuart Summers
2025-10-13 16:25 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/xe: Don't block messages to the GPU scheduler Stuart Summers
2025-10-13 16:56 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-13 17:17 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-10-13 17:31 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-13 17:38 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-10-13 21:49 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-10-13 16:25 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/xe: Check for GuC responses on disabling scheduling Stuart Summers
2025-10-13 17:04 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2025-10-13 17:13 ` [PATCH 0/7] Fix a couple of wedge corner-case memory leaks Summers, Stuart
2025-10-13 21:48 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-10-13 18:45 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Fix a couple of wedge corner-case memory leaks (rev2) Patchwork
2025-10-13 18:46 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-10-13 19:31 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-10-13 23:13 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-20 21:45 [PATCH 0/7] Fix a couple of wedge corner-case memory leaks Stuart Summers
2025-10-13 22:31 Stuart Summers
2025-10-02 23:04 Stuart Summers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aO0xDCa/rTPp9++8@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox