Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/pf: Add max_vfs configfs attribute to control PF mode
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2025 16:48:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aOA2n4npjuprZ1hD@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251002232648.203370-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>

On Fri, Oct 03, 2025 at 01:26:48AM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> In addition to existing max_vfs modparam, add max_vfs configfs
> attribute to allow PF configuration on the per-device level.
> Default config value is still based on the modparam value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h |   4 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf.c |   3 +
>  3 files changed, 146 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
> index 139663423185..464a79c2a903 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include "xe_hw_engine_types.h"
>  #include "xe_module.h"
>  #include "xe_pci_types.h"
> +#include "xe_sriov_types.h"
>  
>  /**
>   * DOC: Xe Configfs
> @@ -169,6 +170,32 @@
>   * Currently this is implemented only for post and mid context restore and
>   * these attributes can only be set before binding to the device.
>   *
> + * Max SR-IOV Virtual Functions
> + * ----------------------------
> + *
> + * This config allows to limit number of the Virtual Functions (VFs) that can
> + * be managed by the Physical Function (PF) driver, where value 0 disables the
> + * PF mode (no VFs).
> + *
> + * The default max_vfs config value is taken from the max_vfs modparam.
> + *
> + * How to enable PF with support with unlimited (up to HW limit) number of VFs::
> + *
> + *	# echo unlimited > /sys/kernel/config/xe/0000:00:02.0/sriov/max_vfs
> + *	# echo 0000:00:02.0 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/xe/bind
> + *
> + * How to enable PF with support up to 3 VFs::
> + *
> + *	# echo 3 > /sys/kernel/config/xe/0000:00:02.0/sriov/max_vfs
> + *	# echo 0000:00:02.0 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/xe/bind
> + *
> + * How to disable PF mode and always run as native::
> + *
> + *	# echo 0 > /sys/kernel/config/xe/0000:00:02.0/sriov/max_vfs
> + *	# echo 0000:00:02.0 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/xe/bind
> + *
> + * This setting only takes effect when probing the device.
> + *
>   * Remove devices
>   * ==============
>   *
> @@ -185,6 +212,7 @@ struct wa_bb {
>  
>  struct xe_config_group_device {
>  	struct config_group group;
> +	struct config_group sriov;
>  
>  	struct xe_config_device {
>  		u64 engines_allowed;
> @@ -192,23 +220,34 @@ struct xe_config_group_device {
>  		struct wa_bb ctx_restore_mid_bb[XE_ENGINE_CLASS_MAX];
>  		bool survivability_mode;
>  		bool enable_psmi;
> +		struct {
> +			unsigned int max_vfs;
> +		} sriov;
>  	} config;
>  
>  	/* protects attributes */
>  	struct mutex lock;
>  	/* matching descriptor */
>  	const struct xe_device_desc *desc;
> +	/* tentative SR-IOV mode */
> +	enum xe_sriov_mode mode;
>  };
>  
>  static const struct xe_config_device device_defaults = {
>  	.engines_allowed = U64_MAX,
>  	.survivability_mode = false,
>  	.enable_psmi = false,
> +	.sriov = {
> +		.max_vfs = UINT_MAX,
> +	},
>  };
>  
>  static void set_device_defaults(struct xe_config_device *config)
>  {
>  	*config = device_defaults;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
> +	config->sriov.max_vfs = xe_modparam.max_vfs;
> +#endif
>  }
>  
>  struct engine_info {
> @@ -721,6 +760,68 @@ static const struct config_item_type xe_config_device_type = {
>  	.ct_owner	= THIS_MODULE,
>  };
>  
> +static ssize_t sriov_max_vfs_show(struct config_item *item, char *page)
> +{
> +	struct xe_config_group_device *dev = to_xe_config_group_device(item->ci_parent);
> +
> +	guard(mutex)(&dev->lock);
> +
> +	if (dev->config.sriov.max_vfs == UINT_MAX)
> +		return sprintf(page, "%s\n", "unlimited");
> +	else
> +		return sprintf(page, "%u\n", dev->config.sriov.max_vfs);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t sriov_max_vfs_store(struct config_item *item, const char *page, size_t len)
> +{
> +	struct xe_config_group_device *dev = to_xe_config_group_device(item->ci_parent);
> +	unsigned int max_vfs;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	guard(mutex)(&dev->lock);
> +
> +	if (is_bound(dev))
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +
> +	ret = kstrtouint(page, 0, &max_vfs);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		if (!sysfs_streq(page, "unlimited"))
> +			return ret;
> +		max_vfs = UINT_MAX;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev->config.sriov.max_vfs = max_vfs;
> +	return len;
> +}
> +
> +CONFIGFS_ATTR(sriov_, max_vfs);
> +
> +static struct configfs_attribute *xe_config_sriov_attrs[] = {
> +	&sriov_attr_max_vfs,
> +	NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static bool xe_config_sriov_is_visible(struct config_item *item,
> +				       struct configfs_attribute *attr, int n)
> +{
> +	struct xe_config_group_device *dev = to_xe_config_group_device(item->ci_parent);
> +
> +	if (attr == &sriov_attr_max_vfs && dev->mode != XE_SRIOV_MODE_PF)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static struct configfs_group_operations xe_config_sriov_group_ops = {
> +	.is_visible	= xe_config_sriov_is_visible,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct config_item_type xe_config_sriov_type = {
> +	.ct_owner	= THIS_MODULE,
> +	.ct_group_ops	= &xe_config_sriov_group_ops,
> +	.ct_attrs	= xe_config_sriov_attrs,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct xe_device_desc *xe_match_desc(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device_driver *driver = driver_find("xe", &pci_bus_type);
> @@ -746,6 +847,7 @@ static struct config_group *xe_config_make_device_group(struct config_group *gro
>  	unsigned int domain, bus, slot, function;
>  	struct xe_config_group_device *dev;
>  	const struct xe_device_desc *match;
> +	enum xe_sriov_mode mode;
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev;
>  	char canonical[16];
>  	int vfnumber = 0;
> @@ -762,6 +864,9 @@ static struct config_group *xe_config_make_device_group(struct config_group *gro
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  
>  	pdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, bus, PCI_DEVFN(slot, function));
> +	mode = pdev ? dev_is_pf(&pdev->dev) ?
> +		XE_SRIOV_MODE_PF : XE_SRIOV_MODE_NONE : XE_SRIOV_MODE_VF;
> +
>  	if (!pdev && function)
>  		pdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, bus, PCI_DEVFN(slot, 0));
>  	if (!pdev && slot)
> @@ -796,9 +901,15 @@ static struct config_group *xe_config_make_device_group(struct config_group *gro
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
>  	dev->desc = match;
> +	dev->mode = match->has_sriov ? mode : XE_SRIOV_MODE_NONE;
> +
>  	set_device_defaults(&dev->config);
>  
>  	config_group_init_type_name(&dev->group, name, &xe_config_device_type);
> +	if (dev->mode != XE_SRIOV_MODE_NONE) {
> +		config_group_init_type_name(&dev->sriov, "sriov", &xe_config_sriov_type);
> +		configfs_add_default_group(&dev->sriov, &dev->group);
> +	}
>  
>  	mutex_init(&dev->lock);
>  
> @@ -988,6 +1099,34 @@ u32 xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_post_bb(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  	return len;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
> +/**
> + * xe_configfs_get_max_vfs() - Get number of VFs that could be managed
> + * @pdev: the &pci_dev device
> + *
> + * Find the configfs group that belongs to the PCI device and return maximum
> + * number of Virtual Functions (VFs) that could be managed by this device.
> + * If configfs group is not present, use value of max_vfs module parameter.
> + *
> + * Return: maximum number of VFs that could be managed.
> + */
> +unsigned int xe_configfs_get_max_vfs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct xe_config_group_device *dev = find_xe_config_group_device(pdev);
> +	unsigned int max_vfs;
> +
> +	if (!dev)
> +		return xe_modparam.max_vfs;
> +
> +	scoped_guard(mutex, &dev->lock)
> +		max_vfs = dev->config.sriov.max_vfs;
> +
> +	config_group_put(&dev->group);
> +
> +	return max_vfs;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  int __init xe_configfs_init(void)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h
> index c61e0e47ed94..16a1f578e4fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ u32 xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_mid_bb(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum xe_engine_clas
>  				       const u32 **cs);
>  u32 xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_post_bb(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum xe_engine_class,
>  					const u32 **cs);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
> +unsigned int xe_configfs_get_max_vfs(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> +#endif
>  #else
>  static inline int xe_configfs_init(void) { return 0; }
>  static inline void xe_configfs_exit(void) { }
> @@ -34,6 +37,7 @@ static inline u32 xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_mid_bb(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum
>  						     const u32 **cs) { return 0; }
>  static inline u32 xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_post_bb(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum xe_engine_class,
>  						      const u32 **cs) { return 0; }
> +static inline unsigned int xe_configfs_get_max_vfs(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return UINT_MAX; }
>  #endif
>  
>  #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf.c
> index 4698348c010a..428b1b62cf48 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_pf.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>  #include <drm/drm_managed.h>
>  
>  #include "xe_assert.h"
> +#include "xe_configfs.h"
>  #include "xe_device.h"
>  #include "xe_gt_sriov_pf.h"
>  #include "xe_module.h"
> @@ -19,6 +20,8 @@
>  
>  static unsigned int wanted_max_vfs(struct xe_device *xe)
>  {
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CONFIGFS_FS))
> +		return xe_configfs_get_max_vfs(to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev));
>  	return xe_modparam.max_vfs;

I like the idea of the configfs, but this here is strange.
shouldn't be better to simply remove the modparam?

>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.47.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-03 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-02 23:26 [PATCH] drm/xe/pf: Add max_vfs configfs attribute to control PF mode Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-03  0:04 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2025-10-03  1:08 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-10-03  3:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-10-03 20:48 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-10-03 21:06   ` [PATCH] " Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-06 19:58     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-10-07 20:48       ` Lucas De Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aOA2n4npjuprZ1hD@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox