Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Satyanarayana K V P <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/xe/migrate: Atomicize CCS copy command setup
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 09:00:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aOex-1E8yBlGFbwI@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aObsmCaIbrSgHrvd@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com>

On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 03:58:32PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 03:41:47PM +0530, Satyanarayana K V P wrote:
> > The CCS copy command is a 5-dword sequence. If the vCPU halts during
> > save/restore while this sequence is being programmed, partial writes may
> > trigger page faults when saving IGPU CCS metadata. Use the VMOVDQU
> > instruction to write the sequence atomically.
> > 
> > Since VMOVDQU operates on 256-bit chunks, update EMIT_COPY_CCS_DW to emit
> > 8 dwords instead of 5 dwords.
> > 
> > Update emit_flush_invalidate() to use VMOVDQU operating with 128-bit
> > chunks.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Satyanarayana K V P <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
> > Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> > Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > V4 -> V5:
> > - Fixed review comments. (Matt B)
> > 
> > V3 -> V4:
> > - Fixed review comments. (Wajdeczko)
> > - Fix issues reported by patchworks.
> > 
> > V2 -> V3:
> > - Added support for 128 bit and 256 bit instructions with memcpy_vmovdqu
> > - Updated emit_flush_invalidate() to use vmovdqu instruction.
> > 
> > V1 -> V2:
> > - Use memcpy_vmovdqu only for x86 arch and for VF. Else use memcpy
> >   (Auld, Matthew)
> > - Fix issues reported by patchworks.
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> > index c39c3b423d05..b629072956ee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> > @@ -5,7 +5,9 @@
> >  
> >  #include "xe_migrate.h"
> >  
> > +#include <asm/fpu/api.h>
> >  #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > +#include <linux/cpufeature.h>
> >  #include <linux/sizes.h>
> >  
> >  #include <drm/drm_managed.h>
> > @@ -33,6 +35,7 @@
> >  #include "xe_res_cursor.h"
> >  #include "xe_sa.h"
> >  #include "xe_sched_job.h"
> > +#include "xe_sriov_vf_ccs.h"
> >  #include "xe_sync.h"
> >  #include "xe_trace_bo.h"
> >  #include "xe_validation.h"
> > @@ -644,18 +647,49 @@ static void emit_pte(struct xe_migrate *m,
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > -#define EMIT_COPY_CCS_DW 5
> > +static void memcpy_vmovdqu(void *dst, const void *src, u32 size)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> > +	kernel_fpu_begin();
> > +	if (size == SZ_128) {
> > +		asm("vmovdqu (%0), %%xmm0\n"
> > +		    "vmovups %%xmm0,   (%1)\n"
> > +		    :: "r" (src), "r" (dst) : "memory");
> > +	} else if (size == SZ_256) {
> > +		asm("vmovdqu (%0), %%ymm0\n"
> > +		    "vmovups %%ymm0,   (%1)\n"
> > +		    :: "r" (src), "r" (dst) : "memory");
> > +	}
> > +	kernel_fpu_end();
> > +#endif
> 
> Everything in this patch LGTM but I think we maintainer input to ensure
> we are breaking some rules about inlined asm code in a driver (no idea
> if this exists) or if a better place would be somewhere common. Can you
> ping Lucas, Thomas, or Rodrigo and ask them about this?

Well, it is possible and we have asm code in i915 for instance (i915_memcpy.c)

But the rule does exist:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html#inline-assembly

"don’t use inline assembly gratuitously when C can do the job. You can and should
poke hardware from C when possible"

In this case here, please explain why exactly memcpy with smp_wmb barriers and
or WRITE_ONCE code combined couldn't solve it.

Also, please explain how exactly vmovdqu guarantees the atomicity promised by
the commit message. On a quick search here my take is that for this 128 or 256
bits, atomicity is not guaranteed.

So, imho this patch is introducing a unmaintainable, complex, and fragile code
that is not even doing what it is claiming to do. But I will be glad if someone
can challenge this and prove me wrong.

Thanks,
Rodrigo.

> 
> Matt 
> 
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void emit_atomic(struct xe_gt *gt, void *dst, const void *src, u32 size)
> > +{
> > +	u32 instr_size = size * BITS_PER_BYTE;
> > +
> > +	xe_gt_assert(gt, instr_size == SZ_128 || instr_size == SZ_256);
> > +
> > +	if (IS_VF_CCS_READY(gt_to_xe(gt)) && static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AVX))
> > +		memcpy_vmovdqu(dst, src, instr_size);
> > +	else
> > +		memcpy(dst, src, size);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define EMIT_COPY_CCS_DW 8
> >  static void emit_copy_ccs(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_bb *bb,
> >  			  u64 dst_ofs, bool dst_is_indirect,
> >  			  u64 src_ofs, bool src_is_indirect,
> >  			  u32 size)
> >  {
> > +	u32 dw[EMIT_COPY_CCS_DW] = {MI_NOOP};
> >  	struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> >  	u32 *cs = bb->cs + bb->len;
> >  	u32 num_ccs_blks;
> >  	u32 num_pages;
> >  	u32 ccs_copy_size;
> >  	u32 mocs;
> > +	u32 i = 0;
> >  
> >  	if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) >= 2000) {
> >  		num_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, XE_PAGE_SIZE);
> > @@ -673,15 +707,23 @@ static void emit_copy_ccs(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_bb *bb,
> >  		mocs = FIELD_PREP(XY_CTRL_SURF_MOCS_MASK, gt->mocs.uc_index);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	*cs++ = XY_CTRL_SURF_COPY_BLT |
> > -		(src_is_indirect ? 0x0 : 0x1) << SRC_ACCESS_TYPE_SHIFT |
> > -		(dst_is_indirect ? 0x0 : 0x1) << DST_ACCESS_TYPE_SHIFT |
> > -		ccs_copy_size;
> > -	*cs++ = lower_32_bits(src_ofs);
> > -	*cs++ = upper_32_bits(src_ofs) | mocs;
> > -	*cs++ = lower_32_bits(dst_ofs);
> > -	*cs++ = upper_32_bits(dst_ofs) | mocs;
> > +	dw[i++] = XY_CTRL_SURF_COPY_BLT |
> > +		  (src_is_indirect ? 0x0 : 0x1) << SRC_ACCESS_TYPE_SHIFT |
> > +		  (dst_is_indirect ? 0x0 : 0x1) << DST_ACCESS_TYPE_SHIFT |
> > +		  ccs_copy_size;
> > +	dw[i++] = lower_32_bits(src_ofs);
> > +	dw[i++] = upper_32_bits(src_ofs) | mocs;
> > +	dw[i++] = lower_32_bits(dst_ofs);
> > +	dw[i++] = upper_32_bits(dst_ofs) | mocs;
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The CCS copy command is a 5-dword sequence. If the vCPU halts during
> > +	 * save/restore while this sequence is being issued, partial writes may trigger
> > +	 * page faults when saving iGPU CCS metadata. Use the VMOVDQU instruction to
> > +	 * write the sequence atomically.
> > +	 */
> > +	emit_atomic(gt, cs, dw, sizeof(dw));
> > +	cs += EMIT_COPY_CCS_DW;
> >  	bb->len = cs - bb->cs;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -993,18 +1035,27 @@ static u64 migrate_vm_ppgtt_addr_tlb_inval(void)
> >  	return (NUM_KERNEL_PDE - 2) * XE_PAGE_SIZE;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int emit_flush_invalidate(u32 *dw, int i, u32 flags)
> > +/*
> > + * The MI_FLUSH_DW command is a 4-dword sequence. If the vCPU halts during
> > + * save/restore while this sequence is being issued, partial writes may
> > + * trigger page faults when saving iGPU CCS metadata. Use
> > + * emit_atomic() to write the sequence atomically.
> > + */
> > +#define EMIT_FLUSH_INVALIDATE_DW 4
> > +static int emit_flush_invalidate(struct xe_exec_queue *q, u32 *cs, int i, u32 flags)
> >  {
> >  	u64 addr = migrate_vm_ppgtt_addr_tlb_inval();
> > +	u32 dw[EMIT_FLUSH_INVALIDATE_DW] = {MI_NOOP}, j = 0;
> > +
> > +	dw[j++] = MI_FLUSH_DW | MI_INVALIDATE_TLB | MI_FLUSH_DW_OP_STOREDW |
> > +		      MI_FLUSH_IMM_DW | flags;
> > +	dw[j++] = lower_32_bits(addr);
> > +	dw[j++] = upper_32_bits(addr);
> > +	dw[j++] = MI_NOOP;
> >  
> > -	dw[i++] = MI_FLUSH_DW | MI_INVALIDATE_TLB | MI_FLUSH_DW_OP_STOREDW |
> > -		  MI_FLUSH_IMM_DW | flags;
> > -	dw[i++] = lower_32_bits(addr);
> > -	dw[i++] = upper_32_bits(addr);
> > -	dw[i++] = MI_NOOP;
> > -	dw[i++] = MI_NOOP;
> > +	emit_atomic(q->gt, &cs[i], dw, sizeof(dw));
> >  
> > -	return i;
> > +	return i + j;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -1049,7 +1100,7 @@ int xe_migrate_ccs_rw_copy(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_exec_queue *q,
> >  	/* Calculate Batch buffer size */
> >  	batch_size = 0;
> >  	while (size) {
> > -		batch_size += 10; /* Flush + ggtt addr + 2 NOP */
> > +		batch_size += EMIT_FLUSH_INVALIDATE_DW * 2; /* Flush + ggtt addr + 1 NOP */
> >  		u64 ccs_ofs, ccs_size;
> >  		u32 ccs_pt;
> >  
> > @@ -1090,7 +1141,7 @@ int xe_migrate_ccs_rw_copy(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_exec_queue *q,
> >  	 * sizes here again before copy command is emitted.
> >  	 */
> >  	while (size) {
> > -		batch_size += 10; /* Flush + ggtt addr + 2 NOP */
> > +		batch_size += EMIT_FLUSH_INVALIDATE_DW * 2; /* Flush + ggtt addr + 1 NOP */
> >  		u32 flush_flags = 0;
> >  		u64 ccs_ofs, ccs_size;
> >  		u32 ccs_pt;
> > @@ -1113,11 +1164,11 @@ int xe_migrate_ccs_rw_copy(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_exec_queue *q,
> >  
> >  		emit_pte(m, bb, ccs_pt, false, false, &ccs_it, ccs_size, src);
> >  
> > -		bb->len = emit_flush_invalidate(bb->cs, bb->len, flush_flags);
> > +		bb->len = emit_flush_invalidate(q, bb->cs, bb->len, flush_flags);
> >  		flush_flags = xe_migrate_ccs_copy(m, bb, src_L0_ofs, src_is_pltt,
> >  						  src_L0_ofs, dst_is_pltt,
> >  						  src_L0, ccs_ofs, true);
> > -		bb->len = emit_flush_invalidate(bb->cs, bb->len, flush_flags);
> > +		bb->len = emit_flush_invalidate(q, bb->cs, bb->len, flush_flags);
> >  
> >  		size -= src_L0;
> >  	}
> > -- 
> > 2.51.0
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-09 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-08 10:11 [PATCH v5 0/3] drm/xe/migrate: Atomicize CCS copy command setup Satyanarayana K V P
2025-10-08 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] " Satyanarayana K V P
2025-10-08 22:58   ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-09 13:00     ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-10-09 16:11       ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-09 18:35         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-10-09 18:49           ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-09 19:49             ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-10-09 20:34               ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-09 23:06             ` Matt Roper
2025-10-10  8:41               ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2025-10-10 19:13                 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-10-13  4:42                   ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2025-10-08 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/xe/migrate: Make emit_pte() header write atomic Satyanarayana K V P
2025-10-08 23:27   ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-08 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] drm/xe/vf: Clear CCS read/write buffers in atomic way Satyanarayana K V P

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aOex-1E8yBlGFbwI@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox