From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>,
"Michał Wajdeczko" <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
"Piotr Piórkowski" <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/xe/ct: Separate waiting for retry from ct send function
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 10:27:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aOfwbbi6/2qhywwi@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251009170844.178199-1-tomasz.lis@intel.com>
On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 07:08:44PM +0200, Tomasz Lis wrote:
> The function `guc_ct_send_locked()` is really quite simple, but still
> looks complex due to exposed internals. It is sending a message,
> and in case of lack of space, waiting for a proper moment to send
> a retry.
>
> Clear separation of send function and wait function will help with
> readability. This is a cosmetic change only, no functional difference
> is expected.
>
> This patch introduces `guc_ct_send_wait_for_retry()`, and uses it to
> greatly simplify `guc_ct_send_locked()`.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> index 3ae1e8db143a..e68953ef3a00 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> @@ -991,22 +991,15 @@ static void kick_reset(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
>
> static int dequeue_one_g2h(struct xe_guc_ct *ct);
>
> -static int guc_ct_send_locked(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
> - u32 g2h_len, u32 num_g2h,
> - struct g2h_fence *g2h_fence)
> +/*
> + * wait before retry of sending h2g message
> + * Return: true if ready for retry, false if the wait timeouted
> + */
> +static bool guc_ct_send_wait_for_retry(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, u32 len,
> + u32 g2h_len, struct g2h_fence *g2h_fence,
> + unsigned int *sleep_period_ms)
> {
> struct xe_device *xe = ct_to_xe(ct);
> - struct xe_gt *gt = ct_to_gt(ct);
> - unsigned int sleep_period_ms = 1;
> - int ret;
> -
> - xe_gt_assert(gt, !g2h_len || !g2h_fence);
> - lockdep_assert_held(&ct->lock);
> - xe_device_assert_mem_access(ct_to_xe(ct));
> -
> -try_again:
> - ret = __guc_ct_send_locked(ct, action, len, g2h_len, num_g2h,
> - g2h_fence);
>
> /*
> * We wait to try to restore credits for about 1 second before bailing.
> @@ -1015,24 +1008,22 @@ static int guc_ct_send_locked(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
> * the case of G2H we process any G2H in the channel, hopefully freeing
> * credits as we consume the G2H messages.
> */
> - if (unlikely(ret == -EBUSY &&
> - !h2g_has_room(ct, len + GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN))) {
> + if (!h2g_has_room(ct, len + GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN)) {
> struct guc_ctb *h2g = &ct->ctbs.h2g;
>
> - if (sleep_period_ms == 1024)
> - goto broken;
> + if (*sleep_period_ms == 1024)
> + return false;
>
> trace_xe_guc_ct_h2g_flow_control(xe, h2g->info.head, h2g->info.tail,
> h2g->info.size,
> h2g->info.space,
> len + GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN);
> - msleep(sleep_period_ms);
> - sleep_period_ms <<= 1;
> -
> - goto try_again;
> - } else if (unlikely(ret == -EBUSY)) {
> + msleep(*sleep_period_ms);
> + *sleep_period_ms <<= 1;
> + } else {
> struct xe_device *xe = ct_to_xe(ct);
> struct guc_ctb *g2h = &ct->ctbs.g2h;
> + int ret;
>
> trace_xe_guc_ct_g2h_flow_control(xe, g2h->info.head,
> desc_read(xe, g2h, tail),
> @@ -1046,7 +1037,7 @@ static int guc_ct_send_locked(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
> (desc_read(ct_to_xe(ct), (&ct->ctbs.g2h), tail) != ct->ctbs.g2h.info.head)
> if (!wait_event_timeout(ct->wq, !ct->g2h_outstanding ||
> g2h_avail(ct), HZ))
> - goto broken;
> + return false;
> #undef g2h_avail
>
> ret = dequeue_one_g2h(ct);
> @@ -1054,9 +1045,32 @@ static int guc_ct_send_locked(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
> if (ret != -ECANCELED)
> xe_gt_err(ct_to_gt(ct), "CTB receive failed (%pe)",
> ERR_PTR(ret));
> - goto broken;
> + return false;
> }
> + }
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static int guc_ct_send_locked(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
> + u32 g2h_len, u32 num_g2h,
> + struct g2h_fence *g2h_fence)
> +{
> + struct xe_gt *gt = ct_to_gt(ct);
> + unsigned int sleep_period_ms = 1;
> + int ret;
> +
> + xe_gt_assert(gt, !g2h_len || !g2h_fence);
> + lockdep_assert_held(&ct->lock);
> + xe_device_assert_mem_access(ct_to_xe(ct));
>
> +try_again:
> + ret = __guc_ct_send_locked(ct, action, len, g2h_len, num_g2h,
> + g2h_fence);
> +
> + if (unlikely(ret == -EBUSY)) {
> + if (!guc_ct_send_wait_for_retry(ct, len, g2h_len, g2h_fence,
> + &sleep_period_ms))
> + goto broken;
> goto try_again;
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-09 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-09 17:08 [PATCH v1] drm/xe/ct: Separate waiting for retry from ct send function Tomasz Lis
2025-10-09 17:14 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2025-10-09 17:27 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2025-10-09 17:50 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-10-10 0:56 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aOfwbbi6/2qhywwi@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--cc=piotr.piorkowski@intel.com \
--cc=tomasz.lis@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox